Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:VAT

Member X
Roseanna Cunningham

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House believes that sanitary products should be classed in the category of essential to the family budget, just as food, children's clothing and books already are, and that, like such products, they should be classed as VAT-free under the EC Sixth Directive; notes that Britain currently has one...

Primary sponsor
Chris McCafferty (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
24 November 1999
Reference
89
House
House of Commons

That this House believes that sanitary products should be classed in the category of essential to the family budget, just as food, children's clothing and books already are, and that, like such products, they should be classed as VAT-free under the EC Sixth Directive; notes that Britain currently has one...

Primary sponsor
Chris McCafferty (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
2 March 1999
Reference
380
House
House of Commons

That this House notes with dismay that the United Kingdom has a higher death toll from cold-related illnesses than any other nation and that a major factor is poorly insulated houses; and therefore calls for a reduction in VAT on insulation and energy efficiency equipment and a massive increase in...

Primary sponsor
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
24 November 1998
Reference
36
House
House of Commons

That this House believes that sanitary products should be classed in the category of 'essential to the family budget', just as food, children's clothing and books already are, and that, like such products, they should be classed as VAT-free under the EC Sixth Directive; notes that Britain currently has one...

Primary sponsor
Chris McCafferty (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
22 January 1998
Reference
683; 683A1
House
House of Commons

If he will comment on the criteria his Department applies in respect of the operation of the Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 33. - Holding answer 20 June 1997.

Asked by
Roseanna Cunningham (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 1997
Reference
4617; 296 c590W;296 c592W
House
House of Commons

If he will undertake to review the decision to refuse the Scottish Environment Protection Agency an exemption in terms of the Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 33. - Holding answer 20 June 1997.

Asked by
Roseanna Cunningham (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 1997
Reference
4618; 296 c590W;296 c592W
House
House of Commons

Wednesday adjournment debate on the Scottish Environment Protection Agency.

Lead member
Roseanna Cunningham
Answering member
Malcolm Chisholm
Department
Scottish Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
25 June 1997
Reference
296 c810-6
House
House of Commons

What discussions he has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer regarding the refusal to grant the Scottish Environment Protection Agency an exemption in terms of the Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 33. - (Holding answer 19 June 1997).

Asked by
Roseanna Cunningham (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scottish Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 1997
Reference
4222; 296 c365W;296 c367W
House
House of Commons

If he will indicate for each of the organisations replaced by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency in 1996; and whether they operated under an exemption in terms of the Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 33. - (Holding answer 19 June 1997).

Asked by
Roseanna Cunningham (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scottish Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 1997
Reference
4220; 296 c364W;296 c366W
House
House of Commons

If he will list the organisations replaced by the Environment Agency in 1996, indicating in each case whether they had been operating under an exemption in terms of the Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 33.

Asked by
Roseanna Cunningham (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 1997
Reference
4225; 296 c282W;296 c285W
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that in the 1994-95 Parliamentary Session some 240 Labour honourable Members signed EDM 1150, which called for VAT on energy-saving materials to be reduced to 8 per cent.; also notes that in February 1996, during the debate in the House on the Report Stage of the...

Primary sponsor
John Hannam (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
10 March 1997
Reference
629
House
House of Commons

That this House notes with concern the impact on small businesses, pension funds, charities, NHS trusts and businesses generally of the Government's recently announced decision to introduce a three year limit on repayment to the taxpayer of overpaid VAT compared to a six year limit for the Exchequer; and, in...

Primary sponsor
Alex Salmond (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
29 October 1996
Reference
85
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the introduction of the Energy Saving Materials (Rate of Value Added Tax) Bill by a cross- party group of honourable Members on 11th January; notes that the Bill will reduce the level of VAT payable on energy saving materials to 8 per cent. and that this...

Primary sponsor
Alan Simpson (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
12 January 1995
Reference
383
House
House of Commons