Skip to main content

1-20 of 109 results for subject:Evidence

Member X
Charles Clarke

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Clarke, Charles (109)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Justice and Home Affairs Council will be held on 27–28 April 2006 in Luxembourg. I shall be attending the meeting with my noble and learned Friend, the Attorney-General, and my noble Friend Baroness Ashton will also be attending. I thought it would be useful if I were to outline...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
26 April 2006
Reference
445 c45-7WS
House
House of Commons

The Justice and Home Affairs Council was held on 1–2 December in Brussels. I chaired the meeting along with my right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor. My noble friend Baroness Ashton of Upholland also represented the presidency. I introduced the counter-terrorism...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
20 December 2005
Reference
440 c197-9WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what his policy is with regard to (a) Ministers and (b) officials in his Department giving evidence to the (i) Scottish Parliament, (ii) National Assembly for Wales and (iii) Northern Ireland Assembly committees; and to what categories of document he...

Asked by
David Amess (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2005
Reference
37382; 440 c2223-4W
House
House of Commons

The Justice and Home Affairs Council will be held on 1–2 December in Brussels. I shall be chairing the majority of the meeting and my right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor will be chairing the items on civil justice. My noble...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
30 November 2005
Reference
440 c30-1WS
House
House of Commons

Terrorism Bill. Third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Passed

Lead member
Charles Clarke
Answering member
Dominic Grieve
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c492-553
House
House of Commons

Sometimes failure to understand is the hon. Gentleman’s characteristic. As I sought to explain in the House yesterday, the Government’s amendment for 90 days included a sunset clause for a clear reason. It was that there should be an opportunity for the House to reconsider the situation after a year’s...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c495
House
House of Commons

I am certain that my hon. Friend is accurately reflecting the views of his constituents who have been in touch with him. It is always open to the Government to bring back further proposals if we wish to do so. I will shortly make a comment about that process. It...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c496-7
House
House of Commons

I accept your guidance, Mr. Deputy Speaker, and will operate accordingly.

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c496
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman.

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c497
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that comment. It is the case that all recent tests of opinion, as well as the feedback that I have received informally from a large number of colleagues in the House, reflect my hon. Friend’s experience in his constituency. I know that he has always been...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c494
House
House of Commons

You will need to advise me, Mr. Deputy Speaker, as to whether or not the phrase ““ne’er-do-well”” is a parliamentary expression. I am genuinely not sure, so I have to be careful about using it or not using it. It is true that I used the phrase outside the House...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c494
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman reheats yesterday’s discussion. I reject entirely the idea that our proposals can be called internment by any other name. That is quite wrong. He should consider the issue carefully in the light of the possibility—he may reject it, but it is real—that there...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c493
House
House of Commons

To be frank, I accept what my hon. Friend says in his personal case. That is true. He has a long and distinguished record of combating terrorism in a variety of ways and has consistently argued for that. He has a different view of the appropriateness of the length of...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c494
House
House of Commons

The purpose is to gather evidence, rather than to change that aspect of the situation, but my hon. Friend is right. One aspect of that report that concerns me is the small number of practices that deal with such cases, which creates massive delays in the legal process, quite properly...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c499
House
House of Commons

All the numbers that the hon. Gentleman mentioned are small numbers. I can tell him some large numbers, if he is interested—a googol, for example.

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c500
House
House of Commons

I am not a lawyer, but one thing I have learned in this job is not necessarily to accept the advice of Gareth Peirce on anything.

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c499
House
House of Commons

No, I did not, but again, I am delighted that the readership of The Guardian now encompasses large numbers of Opposition Members. That is a major development. The hon. Member for Chesham and Amersham (Mrs. Gillan) says from a sedentary position that she can read. I am delighted that in...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c500
House
House of Commons

Indeed. We are talking about a small number, but by definition we cannot be precise about it because by definition we do not know which terrorist conspiracies we will be able to stop and put through that process or not. But we are talking about a small number, and that...

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c500
House
House of Commons

I have already dealt with the hon. Gentleman’s second point. On his first point, I am grateful for his party’s general support of this approach. It is always difficult debating with Liberal Democrats, but I look forward to a proper engagement in a serious way with the individuals concerned.

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c497-8
House
House of Commons

I have given that assurance and I am happy to repeat it. It is obviously important that such reports are matters that inform debate on the law, and that is precisely what is intended.

Member
Charles Clarke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2005
Reference
439 c498
House
House of Commons