Skip to main content

1-20 of 190 results for subject:Reform

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (190)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, do not planning reforms which fail to address land costs for housing development perpetuate a system in which high costs determine affordability of housing for sale? Again, I ask my oft-repeated question: why not examine arrangements in Nijmegen in Holland and Hammarby in Sweden, where housing for sale has been built on land acquired at agricultural prices? Indeed, we could go further by adopting new forms of title which lock in discounted affordable sale prices with occupancy and resale restrictions. We need to think out of the box in this housing crisis.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2025
Reference
845 c2322
House
House of Lords

Can Ministers consider the transition arrangements I have called for? They are: a core of 500 salaried voting Members; a further non-voting but otherwise participating group, declining in membership, who are allowance remunerated with some flexibility on age; and an additional, fully participating voting tier of 100, declining in numbers, available for ministerial appointment but free, on loss of office, to move to non-voting status. That transitional reform avoids much difficulty, protects much of today’s membership and potentially reduces costs and numbers, paving the way to a more comprehensive reform. Could it at least be considered?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 December 2024
Reference
841 c1462
House
House of Lords

My Lords, recently, the invariably interesting if not controversial noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, moved an amendment on fisheries regulations. I supported the amendment in Committee and was about to sign up on Report, but then stopped to reflect that my name in support was irrelevant. House approval for his amendment...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2024
Reference
840 cc1731-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will ask a very simple question. Due to the ageing nature of Labour’s membership of the House, we are now down to as few as 100 Labour Peers regularly attending proceedings. Meanwhile, the Government are openly challenging the excellent and well thought-through Fowler-McFall reforms with a stream of their own introductions, bringing the Conservative membership to nearly 300. If a Labour Government are elected, how can we possibly secure the public business against a background of such overwhelming odds? Is the Government’s strategy to fill the House to capacity and make it difficult for Labour to appoint without further breaching the reforms?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
837 c1899
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what proposals they are considering to reform the House of Lords, in particular with regard to the size of the House.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
1 May 2024
Reference
837 cc1899-1902
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend on the Front Bench on her very comprehensive canter around the course of reform, and I look forward to meeting her during the proceedings on the Bill, if at all possible. I too give a cautious welcome to aspects of the Bill. I...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc722-3
House
House of Lords

Is not the simple, unvarnished truth that, on leasehold for flats, the Government are under intense pressure from powerful institutions, which have sunk millions into freehold title, to duck the big decision and delay? The Government’s response is to leave it to the next Government to sort out. Is it not no more than an income stream for lazy investors, greedy developers and pension funds, all of which are squeezing the Government through political pressure to back off, while leaseholders pay the price? Labour will sort this out.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 January 2024
Reference
835 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, have Ministers noted the large number of leasehold ground rent investments on property auction sites, as landlords, aware of potential changes in the law affecting valuations, offload their leasehold ground rent investments? Innocent non-professional buyers, ignorant of potential changes in the law, are now buying them—caveat emptor—placing themselves at risk of substantial loss. Should government not consider secondary legislation which would alert an innocent market to the dangers of buying these leasehold ground rent investments?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2023
Reference
828 c1854
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with dramatically escalating service charges nationally aggravating the position, is not the answer greater transparency over leasehold, freehold and sub-lease title issues more generally? Transparency alone can often solve problems where landlord anonymity hides accountability. If that is combined with the rolling-up of lease liability payments pending payment on the death of a lessee under the debenture arrangements I proposed on 20 June, it would ease the problem. Will the Government please look at what I am proposing?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 October 2022
Reference
824 c961
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with vulnerable, low-income elderly groups in this highly inflationary period facing unaffordable, escalating service charges and possible loss or even forfeiture of their homes, why not promote or sponsor a national scheme for elderly leaseholders that rolls up service charges in the form of a debenture against property title—effectively a rising legal charge? The debenture holder would pay the service charge on behalf of the resident, and then claw back payments—interest-serviced or otherwise—on death or even before.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2022
Reference
823 c12
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was a member of the electoral registration ad hoc Select Committee, so ably chaired by the late Lord Shutt. The tributes will be many and, if I might say so, well deserved. He was a man who I learned to greatly admire for his political integrity. He...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2022
Reference
819 cc1688-1690
House
House of Lords

My Lords—[Inaudible]—particularly in the original form proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Balfe. He is to be congratulated on taking this initiative. He has truly captured the spirit of public concern about the granting of honours. A review is desperately needed. The reputation of the House is being grossly undermined...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2021
Reference
816 c467
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to reform council tax.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2021
Reference
814 cc1385-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the national framework is flawed. How can a band C house in Cumbria, with council taxes of over £1,600 per year, pay more than a £54 million band H luxury house in London’s Mayfair? Surely such discrepancies in the treatment of houses in the north serve only to further reveal how utterly absurd the whole council tax system has become. Is not the concept of a red wall defending the north no more than a myth, confirmed by the refusal by the Government to reform council tax and its huge inconsistencies?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2021
Reference
814 c1386
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have refrained from speaking on other amendments so as to concentrate my remarks on Amendment 24. I was a member of the ad hoc electoral registration Select Committee, brilliantly chaired by the noble Lord, Lord Shutt of Greetland. I express my gratitude to Professor Maria Sobolewska and...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2020
Reference
805 cc196-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I raise this amendment to probe the Government on the intention behind Clause 32.

Some 27 years ago, as a Member of the Commons, I moved an amendment from the Opposition Front Bench for the establishment of a cattle identification and traceability service. I did so having been prompted...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 July 2020
Reference
804 cc2188-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a simple question: is the law credible in helping genuine accusers when a man now on remand, charged with making false allegations of multiple homicides, fantasy assaults by paedophile rings and fraud, is able to accuse Sir Edward Heath and Lord Greville Janner of rape, and is believed by the police so that the press publishes their names, destroying their reputations? The innocent are treated as guilty and the guilty, false accusers are treated as innocent until found to be lying, by which time the damage is done. Their real motive is compensation under the criminal injuries compensation scheme. The law is a shambles.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 c912
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to reform sexual offences legislation.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2019
Reference
795 cc911-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite what the Minister said, there must be a connection between internet sales, tax raising and commercial rates. Will the Minister explain what is going on in that area? Who is involved in this work? Is it the Treasury or is it his department assessing what can be...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2018
Reference
794 c1517
House
House of Lords

My Lords, have the Germans given us an absolute assurance that they will bring forward the date by which they will reach the 2% contribution target?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2018
Reference
792 c1091
House
House of Lords