Skip to main content

1-20 of 29 results for subject:"Electoral systems"

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (29)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am in favour of an elected House—a position I made clear on my appointment. I strongly support the thrust of the excellent Richard report, which we have before us today. I have no intention of using this occasion to argue the case for reform; I shall do...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2012
Reference
736 c2024-6
House
House of Lords

Can I make it clear that I am in favour of a 100 per cent elected House? Does the White Paper make reference to an indirectly elected House? Does it rule it out? Does the Leader of the House have a view on the question of an indirectly elected House?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2011
Reference
727 c1282
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 1, I will speak also to Amendments 3 and 14, which are related or consequential. I have tabled two groups of amendments on this issue in the Bill, both of which deal with problems that follow the Government’s limiting of choice of electoral systems and...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1393-6
House
House of Lords

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at beginning insert ““Subject to subsections (2A), (2B) and (6),””

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1393
House
House of Lords

It is not necessary to have the AV system in the Bill: that is a matter for the inquiry to deal with.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1408
House
House of Lords

On the issue of eligibility, can the noble Lord ensure that, prior to next week’s debate, we will actually have the registration figures for inner-city constituencies, an undertaking that I was given at the meeting that he attended with the noble Lord, Lord McNally, and the Bill team?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1452
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I greatly appreciate the contributions of noble Lords across the Committee on my amendment. I do not want to delay the Committee, but I do want to say a few words on the comments made by noble Lords. The speech of the noble Lord, Lord Lipsey, was very...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1409
House
House of Lords

I think that when the wider public read the noble Lord’s comments, they will agree with my interpretation of his views. My noble friend Lady Liddell of Coatdyke brought to the debate her very valued experience of how the law of unintended consequences applies in the case of AV in...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1410-3
House
House of Lords

Is the noble Lord giving that the strength that was given to his people’s undertaking on tuition fees?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1416
House
House of Lords

What the noble Lord is missing is that those of us who support electoral reform see what is happening now as our only window of opportunity, perhaps for a whole generation, to see through an electoral reform. So the system on offer has to be one that commands the support...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1426
House
House of Lords

On the basis of the historic utterances of the noble Lord, Lord McNally, on the whole question of alternative vote systems, does he think that the proposition being put to the House in this form of referendum question and this system is ideal?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
722 c1425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to address two issues: first, the 55 per cent dissolution trigger; and, secondly, electoral reform, which I support. I have spent the past week arguing with colleagues the possible merits of the 55 per cent proposal: that is, 55 per cent of the vote in a...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
719 c227-9
House
House of Lords

I have a question of which I have given the noble Lord notice. Confusion surrounds the words in the coalition document which state: ""This legislation will also provide for dissolution if 55% or more of the House votes in favour"." Is that 55 per cent of the total membership of...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
719 c136
House
House of Lords

I ask a question about the operation of the Intelligence and Security Committee, which is an independent committee of Parliament. Is the noble Baroness prepared to initiate work in her department on whether that could now be transformed into a full committee of both Houses?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
719 c245
House
House of Lords

I hope that the House will provide some additional injury time for the noble Lord due to the interventions that he is accepting. This is a question that I wanted to ask him on the Floor: was he involved in the decision to proceed with the 55 per cent? Does...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
719 c217
House
House of Lords
My Lords, what does my noble friend feel are the problems with first past the post?
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
717 c731
House
House of Lords

My Lords, might I remind my noble friend that, when some of us did some detailed research on the alternative vote some 20 years ago, in 1989, we found that it threw up freak results where third-placed candidates were awarded the seat on the basis of the 50 per cent...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2009
Reference
711 c655
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 June 2009
Reference
711 c654
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether my noble friend might take the issue back to departmental officials to see whether the Government could come forward with something that slightly strengthens this. We have concerns and, with all due respect to my noble friend, I still feel that it needs strengthening.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2006
Reference
680 c228GC
House
House of Lords

I presume the £3,000 is in addition to other monies.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2006
Reference
680 c226GC
House
House of Lords