Skip to main content

1-20 of 51 results for subject:"EU law"

Member X
Lord Callanan
Subject X
Reform

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Callanan, Lord (51)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Reform (51)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords consideration of Commons reasons. Lords amendment 15D not insisted on. Lords amendment 42D not insisted on.

Lead member
Lord Callanan
Answering member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc469-479
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 c469
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I will also speak to Motion B. The House will be pleased to know that I can be brief again today. We have extensively debated these issues on a number of occasions.

The reality is that the House of Commons has considered this...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc469-471
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who contributed to today’s debate. I will respond to some of the points that have been made. First, we take Dispatch Box commitments extremely seriously. I reiterate that this Government will not row back on our world-leading environmental protections, as I mentioned in my opening...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc477-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 42D, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 42E.

42E: Because the Commons consider the scrutiny procedure imposed by the Lords Amendment to be inappropriate.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
831 cc478-9
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage third day. Clause 1, as amended, agreed to. New clause agreed to. Clause 2, as amended, agreed to. Clause 3 agreed to. Clause 4, as amended, agreed to. Clause 5 agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Callanan
Answering member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington; Lord Collins of Highbury
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 cc424-498
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c447
House
House of Lords

We discussed consumer protections in an earlier group. The noble Baroness may have made the same points then. I do not see the point of repeating the same arguments yet again. If she has some points to make on the amendments we are discussing today, perhaps she would like to...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c449
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her suggestion of doing some breathing exercises. I apologise to the noble Baroness, Lady Crawley, if I was maybe a bit short, but I was seeking to make the point that we had a debate on consumer protection policies on an earlier day in...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 cc450-1
House
House of Lords

It is a long-established principle that removing and reforming unnecessary and outdated regulation will help the economy to grow. I certainly believe that; the noble Lord might disagree with me but that is my position.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c452
House
House of Lords

Ultimately, this is a political point. The most successful economies in the world are those which have relatively low levels of regulation. The noble Lord and I may have a political difference, but I am sure that we can all propose lots of different examples from think tanks and studies...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c452
House
House of Lords

I know that the noble Baroness feels passionately about labour regulations. We had an extensive debate about this in the first grouping, on labour law. I am happy to go through the issues with her again if she wishes but she knows that the Government’s position is that UK workers’...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c452
House
House of Lords

I know that many noble Lords want to make the point that, somehow, major pieces of retained EU law will suddenly just accidentally disappear from the statute book. We have conducted a very authoritative process of assessing what is retained EU law and what is not, and we are very...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c453
House
House of Lords

Can I explain this point please, and then I will take the intervention from the noble Lord?

We are satisfied that departments know the law for which they are responsible. They do not yet know whether it is a retained EU law—in other words, whether it was done in respect of...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c453
House
House of Lords

I just explained that point in my earlier answer. The noble Baroness can look at Hansard and come back to me if she is not satisfied with that explanation.

To go back to the intervention from the noble Lord, Lord Fox, let us accept for the purposes of making his point...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c454
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that the noble Lord is talking nonsense, as he often does, on this regulation.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c454
House
House of Lords

Let me explain the position. We are downgrading the status, if it needs to be changed through primary legislation—if it was introduced by the EU, through what I would submit was a relatively undemocratic process, in that Parliament had no say on it in the first place—so that if we...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 cc454-5
House
House of Lords

For the purposes of clarification, I was merely repeating a similar point to the one made by my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe. We will reflect on whether it is possible to publish a comprehensive list of laws that might sunset.

I return to the point I made earlier: we are satisfied...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c456
House
House of Lords

Can somebody remind me what Amendment 43 is, please? I thought it was in my notes.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 c456
House
House of Lords

I think I referred to that in an earlier part of my speech. I addressed Amendments 42 and 43, but it all comes back to this central point of the so-called accidental sunsetting that noble Lords have raised. The noble Baroness’s amendments propose to remove the sunset entirely and replace...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
828 cc456-7
House
House of Lords