Skip to main content

1-20 of 42 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Lord Callanan
Subject X
UK Shared Prosperity Fund

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Callanan, Lord (42)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
UK Shared Prosperity Fund (42)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 9 agreed to. Schedules 1 and 2 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Callanan; Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 cc107-164GC
House
House of Lords

Apologies; I thought that the noble Lord, Lord McNicol, was going to speak there. I thank the noble Lords, Lord Ravensdale and Lord McNicol, the noble Baronesses, Lady Blake and Lady Randerson, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas, for tabling Amendments 4, 4A, 5, 5A, 6 and 25.

Let...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 cc145-8GC
House
House of Lords

It is for the CMA to provide guidance on those matters but for the authorities themselves to determine whether the subsidy in question is justified. Then, but only if it is challenged against the principles in the Act, will the CAT be empowered to make a judgment on whether it...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 c149GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who took part in this debate. The noble Baronesses, Lady Sheehan, Lady Hayman and Lady Jones, raising their favourite subject brought me a great sense of déjà vu—the feeling that I have been here before and will no doubt be here on many...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 cc157-9GC
House
House of Lords

I think we discussed this earlier. I am really not sure of the point the noble Lord is trying to make.

Amendments 12 and 29, tabled by the noble Baronesses, Lady Boycott and Lady Sheehan, and the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, would prevent subsidies that would relieve

their beneficiaries from their liabilities...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 cc159-160GC
House
House of Lords

That is not a subject for today’s debate. I have no idea whether the figures produced by the noble Baroness are accurate, but we have had this debate many times. We are phasing out fossil fuel-required generation. We have one of the fastest deployable rates of renewables in the world....

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 c160GC
House
House of Lords

Indeed—[Interruption.] I will let the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, come in as well.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 c161GC
House
House of Lords

We will continue to have these debates: I just point the noble Baroness to the fact that we are spending ÂŁ3.4 billion over the next few years on precisely the schemes that she mentions. By all means, argue that we should be spending even more, but it is just not...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 cc161-2GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes some valid points on the RAB mechanism, which will be debated in full on the upcoming nuclear Bill, but I will write to him on the specific points, particularly about support for the SMR reactors he talked about. I point out that existing subsidy schemes are...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 c162GC
House
House of Lords

I have not satisfied them all yet.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 c162GC
House
House of Lords

I think if the objective is set then it is an overarching benefit, but I will be happy to confirm that to the noble Lord, Lord Purvis, and will copy the letter to the noble Lord, Lord Fox, as well. Once again, I will be very busy in my letter-writing...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2022
Reference
818 c163GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have once again listened carefully to the points made in the debate today. It is always particularly entertaining to listen to the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, who has once again benefited us with his Brexit prejudices. I give some advice to the noble Lord: he just needs...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1490-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 c1450
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group covers Amendment 8M, which relates to exclusions from the market access principles. The noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, has made changes to the amendment since the debate was last in this House. These move the proposed exclusions text from Clause 10 to Schedule 1 and narrow the...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1450-6
House
House of Lords

I thank everybody who has contributed to what has been a very good, albeit brief, debate. I have listened very carefully to the points that have been raised, and I will respond directly to the points of the noble Lords, Lord Stevenson and Lord Fox. Innovative policy-making relating to public...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1459-1460
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn once again to the thorny issue of subsidy control. I will begin by addressing Amendment 50E from the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, before moving on to Amendment 50F from the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles.

I start by saying how pleased I am that we have reached agreement...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1481-3
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons reasons and amendments. Lords amendments 1B to 1D not insisted on and amendments 1F to 1L in lieu agreed to on division (332 votes to 229). Lords amendments 8L, 13 and 56 not insisted on and amendment 8M to the words so restored agreed to on...

Lead member
Lord Callanan; Lord True; Baroness Penn
Department
Cabinet Office; Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Debates on bills
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 cc377-269
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2020
Reference
808 c1481
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 51 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 51A, but do propose the following amendment in lieu—

Commons Reason

51A: Because it is necessary to reserve to the United Kingdom Parliament the right to legislate for a system to...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1317-1322
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendments 1, 9 and 34 not insisted on and amendments 1B, 1C and 1D in lieu agreed to on division (320 to 215). Lords amendments 13 and 56 insisted on; Lords amendments 8 to 12, 15 to 18 and 30 to 33...

Lead member
Lord Callanan; Lord True; Baroness Penn
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Debates on bills
Date
9 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1245-1322
House
House of Lords