Skip to main content

1-20 of 40 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Baroness Byford
Session X
2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Byford, Baroness (40)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, if I fail to welcome back the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, he might take it in the wrong manner. I welcome his return to the Bill. He has put a lot of work into it, and we welcome him back. I shall make one comment and ask one...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2009
Reference
711 c428
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not repeat what my noble friend has so clearly said, but the issue has been raised with me on several occasions. One such provision in particular, if it were so moved, would affect a wildlife sanctuary, which is clearly undesirable. I hope that the Minister will...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before my noble friend does that, perhaps I can ask the Minister a question. He explained quite rightly that this matter will go out to consultation. However, if for any reason that consultation comes down against the person regarding his land or a business operating on it, no...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c28-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister clarify an issue for me? When in the south-west, for example, a coastline route is already agreed, I presume that it is not within the Government’s thinking that they will alter that route, unless it is due to erosion, and that the existing lines to...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c24
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Mallalieu, for bringing her amendments back. I apologise that I was not able to put my name to them—I did not think that I would be here in time—but I am gratified that the Government are moving Amendment 124T, which will help...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c20-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for having listened to the concerns expressed previously and I welcome the various amendments. Amendment 5 talks about the appointment of a chief scientific adviser and that person being an employee of the MMO. Is it anticipated that he will be a full-time professional...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c453
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for that clarification. I asked my question to try to establish what sort of commitment there was, obviously, but also to wonder whether someone involved in scientific research in other fields would be excluded from being appointed. It was nearly a double...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c461
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. Do I understand his reservation to be that he does not see that the whole of the inshore area will be covered by the marine plans; or is it just the fact that this will take time and therefore...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c538
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have an academic question. The MMO, rightly, must be consulted first, as the Minister has reinforced again today. It is a statutory party regarding decisions that are taken. At the end of the day, though, the organisation is consulted only as it stands in the Bill. I...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for clarifying that, and for agreeing to take this away and try to come back with some words that will strengthen the position. Some of us were very concerned about this. Although he said that these matters could end up in the...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c500
House
House of Lords

That would be very helpful. The Minister also spoke of a review within three years, which I read about in the proposals, and he explained that the route will be set up in different stages. Will the review come into being as soon as a certain number of the stages...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c890
House
House of Lords

Do I gather from the Minister that it sets out its vision rather than practicalities at that stage?

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c891
House
House of Lords

We have had a long debate. At this stage, I will read Hansard carefully tomorrow. I again thank those who have taken part and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment A265A withdrawn. Amendments A266 to A267C not moved.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c891
House
House of Lords

Further to that response, which I am grateful to the noble Lord for having set out clearly, is the idea that all enforcement officers will be cross-warranted? That seems to be one way of getting over the problem. If all officers were licensed to operate if they happened to be...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c866
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. It is worth setting it in the context that we have moved on to another specific part of the Bill. I particularly take the point that the Minister has just made. We holiday in Cornwall and the...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c889
House
House of Lords

We now move on to the last part of this Bill, which looks at coastal access. I hope that I am right to welcome this before I speak to my amendment. It will be a change from having to deal with the nitty-gritty of the other parts. First, I should...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c875-7
House
House of Lords

Amendment A265A A265A: Clause 286, page 173, line 19, leave out "the whole" and insert "85 per cent"

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c874
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Greenway, for tabling the amendment. We considered it in the Joint Committee, and I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Geddes. I have great sympathy for his amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Greaves, has quoted the Joint Committee, of which I was also...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c910
House
House of Lords

I support the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Mallalieu, to which I have put my name. It is late and I will not repeat what she said, because she set out her case so very clearly. I have no interest to declare, although I used to...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c946-7
House
House of Lords

I accept what the noble Lord has said on the second point. However, my first point was that people have to access these coastal routes somewhere. My concern about encampments is not with the route itself but with how people access it. I hope that the noble Lord will give...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c939
House
House of Lords