Skip to main content

1-20 of 189 results for subject:Roads

Member X
Lord Brabazon of Tara

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Brabazon of Tara, Lord (189)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill (HL). Lords third reading debate agreed to on question. Bill passed with amendments and sent to the Commons.

Lead member
Lord Jenkin of Roding
Answering member
Lord Brabazon of Tara
Type
Debates on bills
Date
28 March 2011
Reference
726 c1025-37
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion that - 1.- (1) Members of this House, except any Member who receives a salary under the Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975 and the Chairman and Principal Deputy Chairman of Committees, should be entitled to an allowance in respect of each day of attendance on...

Lead member
Lord Strathclyde
Answering member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon
Department
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Debates
Date
20 July 2010
Reference
720 c915-45
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord travels as a representative of the House of Lords, he would be able to claim an allowance under the first category in the table, so that is already provided for. The noble Lord, Lord Sewel, was worried that members of Select Committees might be less willing...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2010
Reference
720 c941-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Leader of the House concludes today’s debate, I wonder whether the House might feel that it is time now for me, on behalf of the House Committee, to attempt to address those points which noble Lords have addressed to the committee’s report rather than to the...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2010
Reference
720 c941
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have consulted the appropriate local authorities on the impact on traffic flows in Westminster and Lambeth of closing Old Palace Yard for the State Opening of Parliament.

Asked by
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 January 2010
Reference
983; 716 c207WA
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on whether he will make representations to the World Squares for All Steering Group on the proposal to close only the road on the south side of Parliament Square and not that on the east side.

Lead member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire
Answering member
Lord Brabazon of Tara
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL)
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
14 July 2008
Reference
703 c1049-59
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, for raising the subject of world squares. I am also grateful to noble Lords who have contributed so knowledgeably to today’s debate. In the time available to me I propose to summarise the House’s position on the world squares...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2008
Reference
703 c1057-9
House
House of Lords

asked the Chairman of Committees:What was the cost of (a) the work that took place to the main road outside the Palace of Westminster (Abingdon Street/New Palace Yard) during the Summer Recess, and (b) the arrangements made in this area for the State Opening of Parliament.

Asked by
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Question originally printed on 19 November 2007 at 696 c44-5WA with the answer misattributed to Lord Rooker.
Date
20 November 2007
Reference
168; 696 c51WA
House
House of Lords

asked the Chairman of Committees:What was the cost of (a) the work that took place to the main road outside the Palace of Westminster (Abingdon Street/New Palace Yard) during the Summer Recess, and (b) the arrangements made in this area for the State Opening of Parliament.

Asked by
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer misattributed to Lord Rooker in Daily Part. Question and answer reprinted on 20 November 2007 at 696 c51WA with the correct answering member.
Date
19 November 2007
Reference
168; 696 c44-5WA
House
House of Lords

asked the Chairman of Committees:How many times the heavy machinery working between the Palace of Westminster and Old Palace Yard during the summer recess accidentally (a) cut off the main power supply, and (b) cut off the back-up power supply; and what is the estimated cost of repairs and the...

Asked by
Lord Colwyn (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Question should have been printed on 1 October.
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
5272; 695 c1WA
House
House of Lords

asked the Chairman of Committees:What action is being taken to repair the damaged blockwork road sections in New Palace Yard; and who will fund the work.

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2007
Reference
3316; 691 c140WA
House
House of Lords

asked the Chairman of Committees:Whether the blockwork sections of road in New Palace Yard were designed to carry the current levels of traffic.

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2007
Reference
3317; 691 c140WA
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the latest stage of the world squares project is the development of proposals for the implementation of the mayor’s Parliament Square public spaces scheme. That involves reorganising the road system, closing Broad Sanctuary on the north side of St Margaret’s Church and making Parliament Square accessible to pedestrians. It is planned that the work will be completed by 2012. There will be no impact on our security measures. I placed a paper illustrating the proposed changes to the road system in the Library of the House today.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1239
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I appreciate the noble Lord’s concern about the length of time that all this has taken, but I must say that the parliamentary authorities are not in the lead on this subject by any manner of means. A whole series of organisations is involved in the world squares steering group, including the Greater London Authority, Westminster City Council, Transport for London, English Heritage, the Government Office for London and the Royal Parks Agency—not forgetting the Mayor of London himself. So it is not fair to blame the House authorities in any way for the slowness of the project; it is probably because so many people are involved that it has taken such a long time. As for Old Palace Yard—that is to say, Abingdon Street—no plans are envisaged by the world squares steering group to close Abingdon Street. However, that would be desirable in the longer term for security reasons. The next stage that will have an impact on cyclists and traffic is what we colloquially call Corus 3, which is to move the Corus barriers further out into the road.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1239-40
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the noble Lord’s latter point is not for me but for the various authorities—the Greater London Authority, Westminster Council, Transport for London and so on—to which I referred earlier. On the other point, we are looking at the possibility of building a subway to connect the Abingdon Street car park and Millbank House to the Palace, although we are at a very early stage on that.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1241
House
House of Lords
My Lords, security is, of course, important, which is why we are moving, probably next year, to push the barriers further out to give a greater gap between the frontage of the Palace and the road. As I said earlier, it would probably be better in the longer term to close Abingdon Street altogether, but that was not accepted by the steering group.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1240-1
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am aware of the situation regarding cyclists. That has been looked into and, as I say, when we move the barriers further out, there might be a possibility of improving the situation, but I am afraid that there is no possibility of that at the moment.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1241
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I regret that there is no good news on the visitor reception building. It was originally due to be opened in, I think, October. It was then hoped that it would be opened by the time we came back after Christmas. There are now serious delays, and it is not expected to open until probably the spring. We have set up an external review to examine the reasons for the delay. I do not wish to go into details on this, because it could very well end up in litigation.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1240
House
House of Lords
My Lords, on the noble Lord’s last point, I am aware of the problems at the exit from the car park. We have looked into that, especially with regard to the bus stop adjacent to the exit, which means that noble Lords and others have to pull out into the middle of the road. I am not sure where we are on that at the moment, but we are looking at it. I appreciate the other point that the noble Lord makes, but there is a traffic light-controlled crossing, which I encourage noble Lords to use.
Answered by
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1240
House
House of Lords
What progress has been made in the world squares project for Parliament Square and Old Palace Yard and the consequent impact on security.
Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2006
Reference
687 c1239
House
House of Lords