Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:Defamation

Member X
Peter Bottomley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Bottomley, Peter (47)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House applauds the success of the Defamation Act 2013 in deterring opportunistic and vexatious libel claims in England and Wales; regrets that the Northern Ireland Assembly's refusal to extend that act to Northern Ireland has had the predicted effect of making the province a forum for libel bullies;...

Primary sponsor
Baroness Hoey (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
8 July 2019
Reference
2594
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, whether East Lancashire Hospitals Trust has insurance cover for legal costs and awards in the event of the Trust or one of its employees being subject to legal action for defaming someone by a statement that is untrue, damaging and not privileged.

Asked by
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2016
Reference
43925
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. and learned Friend give way?

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c917
House
House of Commons

My hon. and learned Friend is absolutely right, but as soon as I saw that he was on his feet, I came as fast as I could, dropping everything else. Last week I voted the way I intend to vote this week.

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c918
House
House of Commons

And I still think I am right. Can my hon. and learned Friend give some examples of where corporations have taken defamation or libel cases that were necessary and could not have been dealt with in another way? As he says, the problem with illustrative cases is that they do...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c918
House
House of Commons

That’s age.

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c919
House
House of Commons

It is true.

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c919
House
House of Commons

It is privileged, too.

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c919
House
House of Commons

I apologise for not being present at the start of the debate, and I am grateful to my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Harborough (Sir Edward Garnier) for introducing my interest. I

should declare that I have been successful in three major defamation actions, and I hope I...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 cc921-2
House
House of Commons

Indeed—that is why my hon. and learned Friend’s career will not be interrupted by the passage of the Bill. Plenty of people will seek his advice. The condition in the proposed new clause in lieu states:

“(2) The permission of the court must be obtained in order to bring an action…(3)...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c922
House
House of Commons

I am aware of that—my hon. and learned Friend is guiding me into making my speech longer than I had intended.

When I was appointed to the Joint Committee on the draft Defamation Bill, I had hoped that the Government and their Law Officers would introduce positive proposals that went further...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 cc922-3
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for taking us through this matter. The problem comes when a body—not a person—sends a threatening letter to an ordinary member of the public. Were I to go to a pop concert and be abused by security staff, and then tell my friends not...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c268
House
House of Commons

Just two names: Peter Wilmshurst and the hundreds of thousands of pounds by a corrupt organisation, a company that had not allowed clinical research to be published properly; and Dr Simon Singh and the half a million pounds of costs over £5,000 of damages, and the court could not find...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c270
House
House of Commons

I want to make two points that were not those I intended to make originally. My third point is that I disagree with my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Harborough (Sir Edward Garnier) almost completely about this, so I will not put those arguments.

Tesco Lotus in Thailand sued...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 cc281-2
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c276
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman might get as far as I did by doing that.

Atos do disability checks for the Government and a number of disability claimants had a forum where they put their comments about that. Atos, I understand, sent a legal letter that closed it down because the threat...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c276
House
House of Commons

I would be grateful if my hon. and learned Friend could advise briefly on two points. First, at which stage should the courts have said, “We are not going to go further with the claim against Dr Simon Singh or against Dr Peter Wilmshurst”? Secondly, with reference to loss, in...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c278
House
House of Commons

Clause 4(6) states:

“The common law defence known as the Reynolds defence is abolished.”

My hon. and learned Friend rightly reminds us that the judge in that case made the statement about “amongst other matters”. Does he interpret subsection (6) as meaning that no other matter may be brought up by any...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 September 2012
Reference
550 c347
House
House of Commons

I welcome this debate. I understand that new clause 4 is not going to be pressed to a Division, so I do not need to declare my intentions on that.

Those associating themselves with the new clause include Sense about Science, Which?, Citizens Advice, Mumsnet, Nature, the British Medical Journal, the...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 September 2012
Reference
550 cc351-2
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention and will end my remarks on this point. It is important that a case does not fall only when it gets to a hearing. At an early stage, a judge should have the responsibility and the opportunity to ask what...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 September 2012
Reference
550 c352
House
House of Commons