Skip to main content

1-20 of 59 results for subject:Tenants

Member X
Lord Berkeley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Berkeley, Lord (59)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful for the opportunity to wind up the debate on these amendments. I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. The debate has ranged widely from those who, frankly, do not trust HS2 further than they can throw it and others who say that it is doing fine...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc388-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened carefully to the explanation by the noble Earl, Lord Lytton, of the problems with compulsory purchase and payments to those affected—mostly by HS1, because so far that is where the experience is available, unless we go back to Crossrail, which I think we will come...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc392-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. This was a probing amendment. I shall never convince my noble friend Lord Adonis that I am not trying to stop HS2; I think we will carry on debating that for many years. My probe—

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 c368GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. I had not intended this to be something on which to divide the House; it is a probing amendment. I said that I would never convince my noble friend Lord Adonis that I am not trying to stop...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc368-370GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, after I put this amendment down, it was slightly taken over by events in the form of an interesting letter from the Public Accounts Committee to the Permanent Secretary at the Department for Transport dated 4 November. I was interested in the comments made during the various stages...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc370-1GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Berkeley

3: Clause 49, page 20, line 44, at end insert—

“( ) A TWA order which relates to an extension or works referred to in subsection (2) may also provide for any provision of this Act to cease to have effect to the extent that the content of the...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 c360GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Berkeley

4: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Quarterly reports on environmental impact, costs and progress

(1) The Secretary of State must publish quarterly reports on the scheduled works throughout the period in which those works take place.

(2) Each such report must contain an assessment of—

(a) environmental impact;

(b) costs,...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 c370GC
House
House of Lords

This is very much a probing amendment so that we can have a debate about the role that Transport and Works Act orders play in and around a hybrid Bill. I will talk about one or two examples but I want to stick to the principle. This has been raised...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc360-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Select Committee and the chair for the report. At least two colleagues who are speaking to this amendment—the noble Lords, Lord Snape and Lord Liddle—were on the Select Committee and I think it did a good job. My only concern is that the House has...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc346-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for introducing this group of amendments. I have listened carefully to the debate so far; some excellent arguments have been made in favour of going even faster than the Bill does. I support it, but, as I shall try to outline,...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2020
Reference
807 cc458-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for that introduction. I have two amendments in this group and I am certainly not happy that they are in a group of 66 amendments. This must be about a record for Committee stage. It is interesting that amendments in this group...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c93GC
House
House of Lords

Is my noble friend suggesting that the Minister should withdraw her amendments as well?

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c94GC
House
House of Lords

Good.

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c94GC
House
House of Lords

Looking at the list of groupings, it appears that the first amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, is Amendment 69, which seeks to leave out Clause 41(6), which says:

“The Pubs Code may require large pub-owning businesses to provide parallel rent assessments”.

Is that what he has been...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c100GC
House
House of Lords

Has the noble Lord thought about what the word “unfair” means? For the pubco, it is probably different to what it means for the tenant. It seems to me to be rather more wishy-washy than “significant”.

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c103GC
House
House of Lords

In this grouping, my Amendment 69A is the next one that is not a government amendment, so if it is convenient for the Committee I will speak to that and try not to delay the Committee too long with comments on the amendments from the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson. If...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 cc105-7GC
House
House of Lords

It is a question of what would constitute selling and what would be transferring it to a company in which the brewery had 100% or 99% of the shares. It is a grey area. The noble Lord may be right but I do not see that as a reason for...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 cc107-8GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Viscount, Lord Younger, has given two more examples to add those of the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, of the happy tenants who have lots of money. He cited one company as investing £30 million in pubs which would not have invested if the MRO had existed. What assumptions...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c113GC
House
House of Lords

With respect, “They would say that, wouldn’t they?”. I am glad that the cavalry has been brought in to help the noble Viscount, Lord Younger. The noble Viscount says that that £30 million would not be invested. “They would say that, wouldn’t they?”. We could do with some figures.

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c114GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, my Lords, but I will try just one last time. The rate of return could just as easily be calculated on the basis of the rent that the tenant will be paying once he has been through the process, because that will be fixed and the company...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2015
Reference
759 c114GC
House
House of Lords