Skip to main content

1-20 of 57 results for subject:Standards

Member X
Ed Balls
Subject X
Complaints

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Balls, Ed (57)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Complaints (57)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

indicated assent.

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c201
House
House of Commons

This is a rather frustrating exchange, Mr. Deputy Speaker. When the hon. Gentleman has finished speaking I will explain the position. I cannot do that at sufficient length in an intervention, but I shall be happy to clarify the position for him as soon as he allows me to.

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c201
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c200
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c200
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has just set out the current legal position with 100 per cent. accuracy.

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c200
House
House of Commons

I hope there is no confusion. If the hon. Gentleman could clarify that there is no confusion, we would not be confused.

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c206
House
House of Commons

I am very sorry to disappoint the hon. Gentleman, but it was the Education Act 1996 that banned the use of corporal punishment in full-time maintained schools and full-time independent schools, not any 1998 Act. It was not to do with human rights; it was to do with the Conservative...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c202
House
House of Commons

I hesitate to ask, but does the hon. Gentleman recall whether he voted for or against the 1996 Act? Will he take this opportunity to withdraw the charge that the current provision was driven by a human rights agenda—or does he believe that that agenda had already gripped the Conservative...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c203
House
House of Commons

The issue is whether a teacher in a Sunday school or a madrassah should be able to claim the reasonable punishment defence for the use of physical punishment on the grounds that they are acting in loco parentis. That is our concern, and that is what the amendment seeks to...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c201-2
House
House of Commons

I am listening carefully to the concerns raised by the hon. Lady—and, indeed, the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton)—that some practitioners, such as GPs, might not be willing to share information, because of the potential breach of parent confidentiality. Does she not think, however, that GPs...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c195
House
House of Commons

The rise in referrals, which means that harm is coming to the attention of the authorities, has been a real challenge for children's social services departments around the country. It has been the result of the heightened awareness of child protection issues among not just social workers but other individuals...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c212
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Gentleman knows, there has been a downward trend over recent years, but if there was a greater rise in notifications last year, we will need to examine and understand it. I am aware of that matter, but I do not believe one can say that it is...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c213-4
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is right. It was because people in this House, and people with expertise and direct personal experience, including my hon. Friend the Member for Keighley, raised particular issues, that the matter is on the agenda. I fear that the hon. Member for Stone may want to broaden...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c211-2
House
House of Commons

As the social work taskforce has stated, initial training, training within the profession, pay and progression and the supervision of social workers at the front line by management have all been inadequate for years. They are now being addressed, because of the taskforce's work, Lord Laming's impetus and the tragedy...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c212
House
House of Commons

I completely agree with the hon. Lady that we need a change of thought process. The NSPCC laid down a challenge to us in its 2 February letter to begin that change. I believe that the NSPCC would agree that we did so with Lord Laming's report a year ago,...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c214-5
House
House of Commons

I have been really indulgent. If I could just set out the current position, I shall absolutely take an intervention. As I understand it, there are two different forces at work here. The hon. Member for Stone wondered whether we should extend the in loco parentis option for using force...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c209-10
House
House of Commons

This has been a full and substantive debate, covering a wide range of issues. On the spirit of the debate, may I say that the contributions of all speakers have been thorough, measured and important? Over the past year there have been times when I have regretted the partisan and...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c208-9
House
House of Commons

The answer is set out in Sir Roger Singleton's letter to me of 27 January, in which he says:""We need to consider very carefully the appropriateness of Government regulating arrangements that parents or carers make with others for the care and instruction of their children voluntarily and for relatively short...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c210-1
House
House of Commons

I was coming to that issue. My hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne, Central made important points. He has raised questions in the past as to whether the authors of SCRs are properly independent. As he knows, one reason why the first SCR into baby Peter was rejected...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c215-6
House
House of Commons

I hear the hon. Gentleman's point, but I do not agree with it. I do not agree that the NSPCC is a "usual suspect", and I do not believe that it makes its arguments for self-interested motives as a way of trying to cover up its role in any cases....

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c215
House
House of Commons