Skip to main content

1-20 of 68 results for subject:Allowances

Member X
Lord Bach

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Bach, Lord (68)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I shall speak to six amendments, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59 and 171. As this is my first and may even be my last contribution, I want to express straightaway that I welcome the Bill very warmly. It gives mayors new powers to appoint commissioners, to increase capacity...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2026
Reference
852 cc315-7GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what forecast they have made of the annual additional costs that will be incurred by MPs taking on enlarged constituencies.

Asked by
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 December 2010
Reference
4532; 723 c94WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will introduce legislation necessary to secure equality between spouses to enable them to sign and ratify Protocol No 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights by (a) abolishing the common law duty of a husband to maintain his wife, (b) abolishing the...

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 January 2010
Reference
804; 716 c26WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to make our debate on this amendment last, but I cannot. We agree with the noble Lord and thank him. We are going to vote with him on this amendment.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2009
Reference
712 c1433
House
House of Lords

There are a number of amendments to deal with in this group. The noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, asked when IPSA will be set up. The answer is not necessarily particularly helpful, but it will be set up as soon as is practicable after Royal Assent. That does not necessarily mean...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1072-4
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the noble Lord and the noble and learned Lord, who have come riding to my rescue on this issue. Although we will reconsider the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, because of its wording, I do not take the point about...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1067
House
House of Lords

Which amendment to accept is a choice for Solomon. I am grateful, as always, to the noble Lord for his advice. Let us keep with this group for the time being. I have now spoken to the various amendments.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1067
House
House of Lords

I am beginning to think that it may be necessary for me to ask the Committee’s permission to take Amendment 43A back to reconsider. I make no apologies for doing that because of the important matters that have been raised during the debate on this group. I am more than...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1087
House
House of Lords

The advice of an ex-Chief Whip, even on the opposition Benches, is always invaluable. I am going to take it. I was trying to explain the position under Amendment 43A, as presently drafted, and I promise that we will look at it.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1087
House
House of Lords

I take the noble Lord’s point. It is the same point that my noble friend was making. That is one of the matters that we will consider with gratitude to the Committee for raising it. I was asked what would happen if the commissioner referred a finding and it was...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1087-8
House
House of Lords

It is about facts but, so that parliamentary privilege is absolutely certain, as we understand it, the committee is entitled to overrule what the commissioner has found. That is going one step further than many might require. IPSA, not the commissioner, will set the procedure for investigation, so there can...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1088
House
House of Lords

I take the noble Lord’s point. If I have dealt with him too literally, perhaps he will understand why. It is important that the commissioner, the Member of Parliament and members of the public know the conditions in which it might be possible to settle the matter without referring it...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1089
House
House of Lords

If the Bill does not allow for that, we must look at it after Committee. It is certainly our intention that the Member of Parliament should have that right. I was asked why the Bill did not allow pre-investigation representations by Members of Parliament. That would add an additional layer...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1088-9
House
House of Lords

As I understand it, the Member of Parliament can explain his own position.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1088
House
House of Lords

Yes, it will.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1089
House
House of Lords

What the noble Lord asks for is utterly reasonable and I will ensure that a letter is written that clarifies our response to his question on this part of the Bill. That letter will be sent to the noble Lord and a copy placed in the Library of the House.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1089
House
House of Lords

Amendment 19C 19C: Schedule 1, page 14, line 11, leave out paragraph (d) Amendment 19C agreed. Amendments 19D to 20 not moved. Schedule 1, as amended, agreed. Schedule 2 : Commissioner for Parliamentary Investigations Amendments 20A and 20B not moved. Schedule 2 agreed. Schedule 3 agreed.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1090
House
House of Lords

There has to be some discretion. Not every condition can be in the Bill. Perhaps the noble Lord will be patient enough to wait for the letter to drop through his letterbox. We have debated this group of amendments for a long time. They arise from government amendments that find...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1090
House
House of Lords

I rise to attempt to help the Committee. The first line of Amendment 43A, to which I have spoken, states that we leave out subsections (4) and (5) of Clause 6. The subsection which the noble Lord is unhappy about disappears if Amendment 43A is successful.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1084
House
House of Lords

Amendment 75 is a probing amendment that deals with the rights of a Member of Parliament. It was spoken to by the noble Lord, Lord Tyler. There is no way in which IPSA can get rid of a Member of Parliament. The noble Lord is right that only the electors...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1086
House
House of Lords