Skip to main content

1-20 of 55 results for subject:Elections

Member X
Lord Bach
Session X
2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Bach, Lord (55)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I now close my speech with some points on which I hope we can agree. We agree in principle about the value of our Human Rights Act, but I have some more specific points. In his opening remarks, the noble Lord, Lord Lester, talked about the court being overwhelmed with...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
705 c140-2GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot give an answer on when it will begin; I am not in a position to do so. On getting the revised action plan on prisoners’ voting rights to the JCHR, which the noble Lord, Lord Bowness, mentioned, we are sorry that did not happen. It is our clear...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
705 c138-40GC
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights on Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgements: Annual Report 2008 (HL 173 2007-08). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill
Answering member
Lord Bach
Department
Ministry of Justice; Joint Committee on Human Rights
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
705 c123-44GC
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords who have taken part this afternoon, particularly the noble Lord, Lord Lester, for moving the debate. He has a deserved reputation in this field, not just from his advocacy in many of the leading cases themselves, but from his own work on the implementation of...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
705 c135-8GC
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:In view of attempts to rename the President of Malawi ““Life President””, what steps they will take to make upholding democracy in that country, in particular the staging of free and fair elections in May 2009, a condition of United Kingdom aid to Malawi.

Asked by
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
6066; 705 c204WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they plan to send parliamentary representatives to monitor the forthcoming elections in Bangladesh.

Asked by
Baroness Uddin (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
705 c190-1WA; 6089
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they plan to send representatives to monitor the forthcoming elections in Bangladesh.

Asked by
Baroness Uddin (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2008
Reference
6088; 705 c190WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did not mean to interrupt the noble Lord. I can answer this question now: my noble friend is due to take leave of absence almost as we speak.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c668
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, was asking me the question. The noble Lord, Lord Lester, answered it admirably, if I may say so without seeking to flatter him unduly. We just have to disagree on this. The Government’s view is that, arguably, Standing Orders would...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c677-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c676
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is right, but in our view Standing Orders do not form part of the law of the United Kingdom. This is the important point of the debate—they would not be taken into account by the European authorities in determining whether we were compliant with EU law.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c676
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken for the interesting and lively debate that we have had so far. In particular, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Trefgarne, for moving his Motion this evening, and I am grateful to him and the noble Lord, Lord Norton of...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c675-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I am being slow. I am missing the noble Lord’s point. I would have thought that the comments I have made about hereditary Peers apply to all hereditary Peers, all of whom were elected after the 1999 Act, unless they were elected in a by-election.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c678
House
House of Lords

Yes, I can, my Lords.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c679
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall try to explain Regulation 4—I know that the House is sitting late tonight. I think that Regulation 4(1)(b) exercised the noble Lord in particular; he said that it is unnecessary. It follows the model in existing primary legislation, such as the Insolvency Act 1986. That is...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c679-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rely on the compromise that was reached between my noble and learned friend Lord Irvine and the noble Marquess, Lord Salisbury, then Viscount Cranborne. It made the number of hereditary Peers 90, plus the two. The House itself, not just hereditary Peers, having agreed that compromise might...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c678
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it cannot be a hybrid order, because this is a negative resolution. I make it absolutely clear that we did not choose it to be a negative resolution because otherwise the issue of hybridity would arise. It is a negative resolution because, having taken advice on the issue...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c679
House
House of Lords

European Parliament (House of Lords Disqualification) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1647). Lords debate on a motion that an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty that the regulations be annulled. Motion debated and withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Trefgarne
Answering member
Lord Bach
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
14 October 2008
Reference
704 c667-80
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will, if approved, recognise the Nigerian presidential process as soon as the High Court in Abuja has delivered its verdict; and whether the United Kingdom High Commissioner will then call on the president to identify implementable initiatives to deepen the bilateral relationship.

Asked by
Viscount Waverley (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer received between Tuesday 9 September and Monday 15 September 2008
Date
29 September 2008
Reference
5024; 703 c402WA
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the European Parliament (Number of MEPs and Distribution between Electoral Regions) (United Kingdom and Gibraltar) Order 2008. The noble Lord said: The order relates to the European parliamentary elections to be held in the...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2008
Reference
703 c71-3GC
House
House of Lords