Skip to main content

1-20 of 426 results for subject:"Freedom of information"

House X
House of Lords
Session X
2005-06

Type

House

House of Lords (426)

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Whether as part of the review of the operation of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 they have made an assessment of the introduction in other countries of provisions in freedom of information fees regulations (a) to include reading time, consideration time and consultation time in the calculation of the...

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
7977; 686 c122WA
House
House of Lords

What safeguards are in place to ensure that public authorities do not use the application of a public interest test to delay disclosure of information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 beyond the time that is required to perform such a test.

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
8020; 686 c85WA
House
House of Lords

What is their assessment of the impact of their proposal to amend the Freedom of Information regulations on the exercise of the freedom of the press to inform the public and the right of the public to be informed about the workings of Government (a) to include reading time, consideration...

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
8068; 686 c85-6WA
House
House of Lords

What is their estimate of the likely impact on the volume of requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to government departments for information about government policies, practices and procedures of the proposal to (a) include reading time, consideration time and consultation time in the calculation of the appropriate...

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
7945; 686 c56-7WA
House
House of Lords

Further to the Statement by the Lord Bach on 14 November 2000 (HL Deb, col. 186), whether it remains their policy that the maximum fee for requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be 10 per cent of the marginal costs of seeking and finding the information; and,...

Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
7946; 686 c57WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 624 to 631. These new clauses restate Part 15 of the 1985 Act in so far as these provisions apply in relation to Part 22 of this Bill. Part 22 enables public...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c479
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 213 to 227. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c452
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments be now considered. Moved, That the Commons amendments be now considered.—(Lord Sainsbury of Turville.)

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c428
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am happy to give the assurance that the Government are on the case. The co-ordination is important, and I reiterate that the changes will enable us to effect the simplification early next year. That is our intention. On Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c476
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the amendment that brings the Data Protection Act into play in respect of the Financial Reporting Review Panel. However, we are disappointed that the Government have chosen to overturn the other amendments that we made to improve—as we saw it—the controls on disclosure....

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c476
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 263. Amendments Nos. 263, 265 and 757 are the net result of a series of amendments that have been tabled in both Houses concerning the provisions in Parts 15 and 24 relating...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c476
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 847 to 861. This group also includes Amendments Nos. 866, 871, 872, 875, 879, 880, 884, 887 and 888. Many of the amendments in this group are technical drafting changes—for example, correcting...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c484-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 994. It removes subsection (3) of Clause 923. Subsection (3) was inserted in this House to declare that nothing in the Bill would involve a charge on public funds to avoid infringing...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c509-10
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 255 to 257. I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 260, 262, 273, 283, 284, 286 to 288, 292, 296 to 301, 916, 935 and 1017. The first 19 of these amendments...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c474-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 862 to 898. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c485
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 833 to 846. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c484
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can give the assurance that no changes of substance have been made. This is just a restatement of the 1985 Act provision. On Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c483
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 785 to 832. These amendments essentially restate provisions of the current law. Noble Lords will remember that, at an earlier stage, we introduced into the Bill a new administrative procedure by which...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c483-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 778 to 784. This group also includes Amendments Nos. 894, 996 and 997. The majority of these amendments form part of the overall restatement exercise. A number of them restate various provisions...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c482-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for that explanation. I intervene briefly because fraudulent trading is an issue that particularly concerns directors of smaller companies. They are, by their very nature, more financially vulnerable. Such companies are a very important part of our growing economy, and the position...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2006
Reference
686 c483
House
House of Lords