Skip to main content

1-20 of 125 results for subject:Location

Legislation X
Football Governance Bill (HL) 2024-26

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Football Governance Bill (HL) 2024-26 (125)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Clause 47 agreed to. Clause 48, discussed with new clause 14, agreed to. Amendment 140 to clause 49 negatived on division (2 to 8). Amendment 111 to clause 49 negatived on division (3 to 8). Clauses 49 to 52 agreed to. Amendment 133 to clause 53, discussed with new clauses...

Lead member
Stephanie Peacock
Answering member
Louie French
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Football Governance Bill (HL) Committee
Date
12 June 2025
House
House of Commons

Amendment 104 to schedule 4, discussed with new clause 16, negatived on division (3 to 12). Amendment 112 to schedule 4 negatived on division (4 to 11). Schedule 4 agreed to. Amendment 106 to clause 19 negatived on division (3 to 12). Clauses 19 and 20 agreed to. Amendment 135...

Lead member
Stephanie Peacock
Answering member
Louie French
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Football Governance Bill (HL) Committee
Date
10 June 2025
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage sixth day. Clauses 22 to 24 agreed to. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clauses 25 to 52 agreed to. Clause 53 under consideration. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Baroness Twycross; Baroness Blake of Leeds
Answering member
Lord Markham; Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 cc268-324
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Moynihan, and the noble Baroness, Lady Brady, in this matter. It cannot possibly be fair to have a regulatory system in which, if the regulator does not perform and reach a decision within the specified time, for reasons that are not the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c294
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to intervene so early, but the noble Baroness has said something quite stark. The policy of the United Kingdom is very clear in relation to the Russian Federation at the moment. Roman Abramovich was sanctioned because of the UK’s very clear position and the ownership of Chelsea...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c302
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has pre-empted the further comments that I was going on to make. I can address this here. Clearly, in the example that is given regarding Russia, anyone connected to a state that is subject to sanctions would not pass the test. That is a straightforward way of...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 cc293-303
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister help me? She said she would comment on the amendments. What are her comments on Amendment 192, tabled by my noble friend Lord Addington, which would require the Bill’s propriety test to include equality, diversity and inclusion? We had a long and wide-ranging discussion on that the...

Member
Lord Goddard of Stockport (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 cc303-295
House
House of Lords

I am sorry that we have not had a fuller discussion on that, but I thank the noble Lord, Lord Addington, for his amendment and I agree that equality, diversity and inclusion are significant factors which the regulator has a duty to highlight. Equality, diversity and inclusion are not named...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 cc295-304
House
House of Lords

Could the noble Baroness say something about the UEFA letter which expresses its views on the Bill? Will she assure the Committee that a copy of this letter will speedily be sent to the noble Baroness, Lady Brady, and a copy put in the Library so that we know what...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c304
House
House of Lords

My understanding is that we will not be sending it, but I am sure there will be further clarification on this point.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c304
House
House of Lords

Can I ask why? This is a letter from the sports regulatory body that governs European football. Surely the Committee is entitled to know what its views are on the substance of the Bill we are debating.

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c304
House
House of Lords

We have already covered this point. We are talking about a private letter to the Government. That is my understanding of the situation. I do not feel qualified to comment further at this stage.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c305
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just want to say a word about Amendment 207. It talks about a club that is not a regulated club but bears a very similar resemblance to one that is in things such as the name, the shirt colours and things of that type—almost an imitation of...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c305
House
House of Lords

It is a private letter that has convinced the Government to change the Bill in the way that we are debating here, so I hope the noble Baroness will take that away and hear the repeated request from the Committee to see this letter. It has persuaded them to take...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 cc305-297
House
House of Lords

With regard to the UEFA letter, I refer noble Lords back to the comments that my noble friend Lady Twycross made previously. To clarify, we did not in fact say that the letter was the reason for changing the Bill; we said that UEFA’s views more generally were the reason...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c297
House
House of Lords

But somebody who is not subject to sanctions but who is connected to a Government whom the UK is in dispute with would not be covered because of the removal of this provision from the Bill. I am happy if the noble Baroness wants to write on this, but this...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c297
House
House of Lords

We have gone through this several times. If there could at least be some private way in which those people involved in this could see this letter, it would be of assistance, because this is becoming a hardy perennial that is getting in the way of progress.

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c306
House
House of Lords

I think everybody is thinking about the previous examples we have been given, but would not the example that the noble Lord, Lord Parkinson, just gave us of the non-sanctioned Russian individual be covered by the other considerations and the holistic attitude that my noble friend the Minister was telling...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c306
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for her helpful comments. I am not able to comment further at this moment. I think the detail is probably beyond this discussion and I recognise the comments about going round and over things again.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c298
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness but it would be helpful if we could have something in writing on this. As I say, I gave a poor example in the case of Roman Abramovich, but the hypothetical example is one that I would be grateful for an answer to....

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2024
Reference
842 c300
House
House of Lords