Skip to main content

1-20 of 776 results for house:"House of Commons"

Legislation X
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill 2022-23

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill 2022-23 (776)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 13/08/2025 from Hilary Benn MP to Sir Iain Livingstone, Head of Operation Kenova, regarding the recommendations made in the Operation Kenova interim report and an update on matters in relation to the NI Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023. 3p.

Deposited by
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 August 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0573
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, if he will make an estimate of the potential costs for implementing the (a) Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill and (b) Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery.

Asked by
Colum Eastwood (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 September 2023
Reference
199232
House
House of Commons
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
18 September 2023
Reference
737 cc1154-5
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs update the House on the Northern Ireland legacy legislation?

Asked by
Anna Firth (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2023
Reference
737 c537
House
House of Commons

Yesterday the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill passed this House. Legacy is an incredibly difficult issue. Victims have been let down for many years. Veterans have been let down. This Government made a commitment that we would see through our promises to both those groups, and that is what we did yesterday. I am disappointed that the Opposition voted against it again, but politics is about choices, and I am proud of what this Government have delivered.

Answered by
Johnny Mercer (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 September 2023
Reference
737 c537
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendments 44D, 44E, 44F, 44G, 44H and 44J.

Let me begin by reminding the House that the Government have sought to make a realistic assessment of what we can best deliver for families more than a quarter of a century after...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c435
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that the Secretary of State—whom, by the way, I greatly respect—has come here to try to deliver the Bill as it is, but may I make this point to him? A great many people out there have lost loved ones over the years—we all know who they are—and...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c435
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his point, for the way he has raised it, and indeed for the numerous conversations we have had on these matters outside this place and within it. He knows the answer that I am going to give him. I will never, and can never,...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State says he cannot put himself in the shoes of the victims, but he could listen to them. Can he tell us how many or what percentage of the victims he has met have shown support for this piece of legislation?

Member
Colum Eastwood (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

Very few have shown support for this legislation, but I have met many, as has my Lords Minister, Lord Caine. In fact, part of the process of changing the Bill has come from those conversations. I understand that lots of families do not want this Bill, but the question then...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Claire Hanna (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

I happily give way. Please correct me.

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

Would the Minister acknowledge that it did have cross-party support—the Ulster Unionists deferred on one small matter—and that it was recommitted to by his Government and the Irish Government as recently as January 2020?

Member
Claire Hanna (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

And it did not move forward because of the different political issues that came about.

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

The Minister made this very point at an event that I was at at the weekend, but it was Chatham House rules so I am not allowed to talk about it. He puts forward the argument that the parties just could not agree, but I was involved in many of...

Member
Colum Eastwood (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c436
House
House of Commons

I am afraid I do not quite believe that that is the case. However, the British Government have committed to full disclosure to the ICRIR, which allows for a huge amount of information to be put forward in those circumstances and the possibility of ensuring that the commissioner can obtain...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c437
House
House of Commons

The Minister said that if families were to have a say on whether immunity should be granted, it would undermine the whole thrust of the Bill, but the point of the Bill is to ensure that people and families who have been hurt, traumatised and damaged by what happened as...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c437
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his point. The many amendments to this Bill throughout the last year have included measures on how families should be engaged with and how their views should be heard throughout the process. To ensure that the commission can obtain as much information for...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c437
House
House of Commons

This was never going to be an easy issue, or an easy Bill. If it was easy, it would have been done many years ago. What the Government are proposing may be right, or it may be part right and part wrong. I certainly think that giving those survivors and...

Member
Simon Hoare (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c437
House
House of Commons

I thank the Chairman of the Select Committee for his point. He will know that other amendments I have tabled have tried to make this body as independent as it can possibly be. I am sure he will have taken great heart from the appointment of the chief commissioner designate,...

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2023
Reference
737 c437
House
House of Commons