Skip to main content

1-20 of 92 results for subject:Enforcement

Legislation X
Telecommunications (Security) Bill 2019-21 to 2021-22
House X
House of Commons

Type

House

House of Commons (92)

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Telecommunications (Security) Bill 2019-21 to 2021-22 (92)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Clauses 6 to 10 agreed to. Amendment 14 to clause 11 negatived on division (3 to 10). Clauses 11 to 16 agreed to. Clause 17 under consideration.

Lead member
Matt Warman
Answering member
Chi Onwurah
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Telecommunications (Security) Bill Committee
Date
26 January 2021
House
House of Commons

Clauses 17 to 27 agreed to. Clause 28, as amended, agreed to. Clause 29 agreed to. New clause 3 (Duty of Ofcom to report on its resources), discussed with new clause 7 (Review of Ofcom’s capacity and capability to undertake duties (No. 2)) negatived on division (3 to 10). New...

Lead member
Matt Warman
Answering member
Chi Onwurah
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Telecommunications (Security) Bill Committee
Date
26 January 2021
House
House of Commons

Examination of witnesses.

Lead member
Matt Warman
Answering member
Chi Onwurah
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Telecommunications (Security) Bill Committee
Date
19 January 2021
House
House of Commons

I welcome the introduction of the Bill. It is long overdue. Over the past two years, the Government have attributed a range of significant cyber-attacks to Russia, China, North Korea and Iran. Such attacks are unlikely to reduce any time soon, but our legislative and technological resilience can increase in...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 cc88-9
House
House of Commons

I am not going to engage too heavily with my hon. Friend’s trousers, but I will say to him that, as I said a minute ago, we are committed to taking forward an ambitious package of changes to strengthen and future-proof the Modern Slavery Act 2015, and that is one...

Member
Matt Warman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 cc122-3
House
House of Commons

Second reading. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on proceedings on committal, in Public Bill Committee and on third reading. Agreed to on question. Money resolution. Queen's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question. Ways and means resolution agreed to on question. Carry-over motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Oliver Dowden
Answering member
Jo Stevens
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 cc69-126
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises an important point. We are clear-eyed about putting national security first. If national security and economic interests are in conflict with each other, national security comes first. But within the context of that, we have properly weighed up the risks as between different dates. I believe...

Member
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c74
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is wrong. This Bill is actually about security. The reason he is going to get the powers is to take out vendors who are a clear high risk. Huawei has been there for a while. The kit that he is talking about banning after 2021—even if...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c74
House
House of Commons

I say to the hon. Gentleman—[Interruption.] I beg his pardon. It is the right hon. Gentleman. I stand corrected. I say to the right hon. Gentleman that, first, this Bill and the measures in it implement what we announced as a Government in January and July, which, in turn, was...

Member
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 cc74-5
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State is rightly focusing on open RAN and the opportunity to partner with others in the democratic and law-abiding world. What has he done to reach out to countries such as South Korea, whose Samsung system could provide for the UK, and to encourage Nokia, Ericsson and...

Member
Tom Tugendhat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c75
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to say that the Minister for Digital Infrastructure has met every one of the parties my hon. Friend named; indeed, I have met many of them. Essentially, we are working across three strands. First, we are working with the existing vendors—there were three, now to become two—to...

Member
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c1023
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend, who is being customarily generous in giving way, but can I just make a point to him and hear his answer? This situation has constantly been wrongly described as a market failure. It was not a market failure; the failure was in...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c1023
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend highlights one of a range of different market distortions that have been going on. To a certain extent, there will be some market correction, but the Government also need to intervene, and our diversification strategy addresses that. If we are to get existing vendors who are...

Member
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c76
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak in this Second Reading debate on the Telecommunications (Security) Bill on behalf of the official Opposition. Labour will always put national security first, so we are pleased to finally see this Bill brought forward by the Government. All sides of the House agree that...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 cc76-7
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady will forgive me for picking just a very small hole in her argument. One of the very few policies on which President-elect Biden and President Trump, and indeed even Speaker Pelosi, do absolutely agree is the challenge of China and digital infrastructure, and particularly Huawei, so I...

Member
Tom Tugendhat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c77
House
House of Commons

I accept that it is not just an American issue, but it was the right thing for the wrong reasons, essentially. As I say, this political soap opera has been an unnecessary distraction when it comes to the serious matter of extracting high-risk vendors from the network, which has been...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c77
House
House of Commons

On a point of fact and detail, I recall in 2009 the Chinese Premier being with the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Downing Street, welcoming the strategic partnership—with an all-singing, all-dancing party in Downing Street—between Vodafone and Huawei. It is therefore a little party political to suggest that it...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c77
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman seems to have forgotten about the former Prime Minister David Cameron and the former Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, who also gave such a welcome.

It is worth outlining for the record the meandering journey that we have been on towards the publication of the Bill. The...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 cc77-8
House
House of Commons

It is worse than that. I know we had the panda-hugging days of Osborne and Cameron, but an ISC report in 2013 raised the issue of critical national infrastructure, with particular reference to Huawei, and nothing was done.

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c78
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. For the benefit of anyone who has not read that report, it is pretty damning. We now find ourselves in a situation in which drastic action is necessary to safeguard national security and our critical national infrastructure, while at the very same time...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2020
Reference
685 c78
House
House of Commons