Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for subject:Devolution

Legislation X
United Kingdom Internal Market Bill 2019-21
Member X
Patrick Grady

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Grady, Patrick (8)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What recent discussions he has had with the devolved Administrations on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill.

Asked by
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2020
Reference
910308; 686 cc126-7
House
House of Commons

Those of us who are paying attention will have seen that the House of Lords has passed amendments to the UKIM Bill to try to salvage what might be left of the devolution settlement, which the Government have explicitly rejected. If Members look at the Order Paper, they will see that it states:

“The Scottish Parliament and Senedd Cymru have each decided not to approve a Legislative Consent Motion relating to this Bill.”

How is this respecting the devolution settlement? This Government legislated to protect Sewel on statute, but now they are riding roughshod all over it.

Asked by
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 December 2020
Reference
686 c126
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Hollobone. Would it be okay if I stayed here while my colleague makes his introductory speech?

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2020
Reference
681 c141WH
House
House of Commons

I thank—[Interruption.] Conservative Members are getting very agitated about some of this, but is this not the point—the real power grab here and the real undermining of the devolution settlement is the callous disregard for the Sewel convention, which this Government put on a statutory footing and are now completely...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
681 c290
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a powerful point about the huge flaws in the propositions of clause 46 to give the UK Government power to spend money on issues that are not the priority in Scotland, and she is right to draw a contrast with EU funding. The road I...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c342
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way. He is obviously passionate about Britain, and good luck to him, because he is not going to have that passion available to him for much longer once we are independent. Is he content with the idea that the Bill will gain Royal...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2020
Reference
680 c369
House
House of Commons

Does this not get to the crunch? Government Members keep asking what powers are being taken away from the Scottish Parliament. My hon. Friend is outlining it—the power that is being taken away is the power to make all these decisions. The Scottish Parliament is going to be trumped by...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2020
Reference
680 c207
House
House of Commons

Is not the power grab compounded by the fact that the Government clearly intend to push this legislation through without legislative consent to the Bill from any of the devolved Administrations? When they ask, “Where is the power grab? Give us an example,” that is it. They are refusing even...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 September 2020
Reference
680 c218
House
House of Commons