Skip to main content

1-20 of 183 results for subject:Registration

Legislation X
Domestic Abuse Bill 2019-21

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Domestic Abuse Bill 2019-21 (183)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 9B.

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c116
House
House of Commons

I thank right hon. and hon. Members of this House and noble Lords who have worked tirelessly to make this a truly transformational Bill. It will make a significant difference to the lives of many women, men and children by better protecting them from their abusers and providing them with...

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc116-8
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister clarify what she just said? At the moment, repeat domestic abuse cases and stalkers will often not be included in categories 1 or 2 because the offences are not treated as serious enough in the way those categories are listed. Category 3 currently involves a tiny number...

Member
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c118
House
House of Commons

As the right hon. Lady will know, category 1 perpetrators have to have committed a specified sexual offence under the legislation, and for category 2 they have to have been convicted of a violent offence and received a sentence of imprisonment for at least 12 months. If they are domestic...

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c118
House
House of Commons

There are countless serious repeat domestic abuse cases that are not sexual offences. There are also countless very serious repeat domestic abuse offences that do not pass the 12-month threshold. All the Minister is saying is that she is going to try to include little bits of lines about domestic...

Member
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c118
House
House of Commons

I do not accept that. The point is that category 3, as we have always said, is the flexible category. It is meant precisely to fit those cases that the hon. Lady has described. These offenders do not fit in category 1 or 2, but because they are considered to...

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c119
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c119
House
House of Commons

One more time, then I have to make progress.

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c119
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful to the Minister, who is being very generous with her time. May I specifically ask about category 3? There are only around 300 offenders in that category, compared with the thousands or nearly tens of thousands of people that we are talking about. Will she undertake...

Member
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c119
House
House of Commons

The flexibility of category 3 means that that is already possible, if there has been a conviction. I gave the example on 15 April of criminal damage, such as if somebody kicks down a door. On the face of it, a criminal damage offence would not fit into category 1...

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc119-120
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for running through the amendments in lieu. I am sure she will not be surprised to hear that the Labour party remains in agreement with the Lords amendments. I will also run through some of the amendments in lieu and ask some questions. My right hon....

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc120-2
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak so early in this debate. It seems to me that what has changed since only a few days ago is that the Government have clearly been in listening and amending mode. In the previous debate, I raised the concerns of two constituents:...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c123
House
House of Commons

I want to speak briefly in relation to the amendments on data sharing for immigration purposes tabled by Baroness Meacher, which are Lords amendments 40B and 40C, as well as the Lord Bishop of Gloucester’s amendment on the domestic violence rule and concession, which is Lords amendment 41B.

On the former,...

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc124-5
House
House of Commons

Consideration of Lords amendments. Clause 55, motion to disagree with Lords amendment 9B, debated with Lords amendments 40B, 40C, 41B, 42D-F, government motions to disagree and amendments in lieu. Lords amendment 9B disagreed to on division (352 to 219). Proceedings interrupted (programme motion, 15 April). Government amendments in lieu made....

Lead member
Victoria Atkins
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc115-150
House
House of Commons

I recognise the progress that has been made on these issues through the process with the other House. But as somebody who has been in the House for 11 years seeking to amend legislation to effect change, I gently say to the Minister that every Minister has told us that...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc125-6
House
House of Commons

I also welcome the progress that has been made on the Bill and the cross-party consensus that exists on many of the important measures, but I want to take this opportunity to pursue further the issues around stalking and repeat perpetrators of domestic abuse, and to discuss what more needs...

Member
Yvette Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc126-7
House
House of Commons

It seems like an age since I spoke on Second Reading, and I commend those involved in the massive amount of work that has been done on both sides of the House and in the Lords. I spoke at that time because, unfortunately, the rates in Bristol South are double...

Member
Karin Smyth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 c127
House
House of Commons

I share what I believe was possibly the frustration of many other speakers tonight that we are so close to achieving what we want the Bill to achieve, yet we seem unable to cross that final line. I appreciate the efforts made by the Government and everyone else, and by...

Member
Christine Jardine (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc127-8
House
House of Commons

Briefly, I wish to highlight my concerns on the issue of the identification, monitoring and management of serial domestic abuse and stalking perpetrators, and the provisions that refer to that. I base most of the comments I make in this Chamber on personal experience—on the people I meet in my...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc128-9
House
House of Commons

I thank hon. and right hon. Members across the House for the constructive tone they have maintained not just tonight but throughout. I am particularly moved by the comments the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) has just made. He speaks of the constituents he meets in his office. He...

Member
Victoria Atkins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2021
Reference
693 cc129-130
House
House of Commons