Skip to main content

1-20 of 156 results for subject:Staff

Legislation X
Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 2017-19 (156)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords report stage. Government amendments agreed to. Other amendments agreed to.

Lead member
Earl Howe; Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc926-943
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Howe

1: Clause 2, page 2, line 32, at end insert—

“(i) to promote public understanding of the purposes of the Restoration and Renewal Programme.”

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c926
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also Amendments 2, 3, 4 and 5. These amendments, taken together, are designed to address a number of concerns—raised at Second Reading and in Committee by the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, and others—on the twin themes of engagement with specific categories of individuals about the...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc927-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, understandably, over the summer and this afternoon the minds and hearts of parliamentarians have been somewhere other than on debating the restoration and renewal Bill. However, I congratulate the noble Earl on his new appointment and role, and I want to put it on the record that, if...

Member
Lord Blunkett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc929-930
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fully support the amendments on the Marshalled List, particularly Amendment 5 which refers to “facilitating improved public engagement”. I wonder whether there is still a possibility that that engagement could be other than remote. A question was asked in the other place about the possibility of access...

Member
Lord Haselhurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc930-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my thanks to my noble friend Lord Howe for the amendments and place on record my thanks to the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, for all the work he has done on securing these amendments. They are extremely important—in particular, as my noble friend Lord Haselhurst would...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc931-633
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will add my thanks to all those who have worked during August to come up with a solution that meets not just the needs of those moving the amendments but the sentiments that were expressed during the debate. As a member of the shadow sponsor body, I...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c932
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support these amendments. Seeing the reference to “remote access” in one of them, I thought it not inappropriate to draw the House’s attention to the tremendous changes there have been in recent years. I

first became a Member of the House of Commons 45 years ago....

Member
Lord Cope of Berkeley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c932
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Howe

2: Clause 2, page 2, line 35, at end insert—

“(3A) In performing the duties under subsection (2)(a) and (b), the Sponsor Body must make arrangements for seeking the views of—

(a) people employed in or for the purposes of either House of Parliament,

(b) people working for members of either...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc934-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Blunkett

6: Clause 2, page 3, line 15, leave out from “that” to end of line 18 and insert “opportunities to secure economic or other benefits of the Parliamentary building works are available in all areas of the United Kingdom.”

Member
Lord Blunkett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c935
House
House of Lords

I should apologise to the House because my lack of surefootedness, if I might put it that way, has resulted in Amendment 6 coming back to the House this afternoon. As Members will recall, we discussed it in Committee and I inadvertently did not press it to the vote, so...

Member
Lord Blunkett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc935-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome Amendment 6 from my noble friend Lord Blunkett, and strongly support his aim to specify in the Bill that the economic and other benefits of the parliamentary building works are supported across the whole of the UK.

Businesses across the UK must benefit from the economic opportunities...

Member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c936
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, for retabling this amendment and reassure him that we continue to support it. As he said, we spoke to it in Committee, and I emphasised the Government’s support. It was very kind of him to take the blame on his shoulders, but it...

Member
Baroness Evans of Bowes Park (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc936-634
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Wheeler

7: Clause 6, page 5, line 11, at end insert—

“( ) recommendations from the Sponsor Body for the future maintenance of the Palace of Westminster over the longer term after completion of the works;”

Member
Baroness Wheeler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c937
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure that the sponsor body would be happy to meet the noble Baroness and her colleagues—indeed, any noble Lord on any matter relating to this programme. I may regret saying that, but it is important that the shadow sponsor body and the sponsor body are as...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c938
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Wheeler, for speaking to this amendment, which, as she made clear, provides that the parliamentary relationship agreement may include provision about recommendations from the sponsor body for the future maintenance of the Palace of Westminster over the longer term...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc635-940
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Earl for his reassurances on the importance of this matter and for his thorough and helpful explanation of both the reporting and future monitoring delivery arrangements. I feel very reassured. Obviously, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Scott, in particular for her willingness to meet with...

Member
Baroness Wheeler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c941
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Wallace of Tankerness

8: Schedule 1, page 19, line 17, at end insert—

“( ) A report under this paragraph must include the Sponsor Body’s best estimate of the timeline for the Palace restoration works, including likely dates for the decant of each House and the estimated date of completion.”

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c941
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I moved an amendment in Committee seeking a timeline to be outlined by the sponsor body, it was not my original intention to move an amendment on Report. However, having listened to the debate and the comments made, I said at the end of the debate that...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 cc941-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome and fully support the principle behind Amendment 8, which underlines that the work should be carried out without delays and must be cost effective. The sponsor body has said it expects the current timeline for the project to be around 10 years, from the mid-2020s to...

Member
Baroness Wheeler (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
799 c942
House
House of Lords