Skip to main content

1-20 of 778 results for subject:Taxation

Legislation X
Finance (No. 2) Bill 2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Finance (No. 2) Bill 2017-19 (778)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
15 March 2018
Reference
CHAP 3 2018; 2018 c. 3

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Committee negatived. Standing Order 46 having been dispensed with, the Bill was read a third time and passed.

Lead member
Lord Bates
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 cc1236-1245
House
House of Lords

My Lords, could it be perhaps that noble Lords wish to speak in the next debate, which they see as more important?

Member
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 c1244
House
House of Lords

That is one possible explanation, but your Lordships have always been assiduous in their attention to matters such as the Finance (No. 2) Bill before us.

Let me try to address some of the points that were raised. The first point was on the argument about growth. We were the joint...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 cc1244-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill before the House today is a mere 187 pages long, which compares favourably to the more than 600 pages of the previous Finance Bill. In part, this reflects the Government’s move to a single, annual fiscal event but it also represents the fact that in December...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 cc1236-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suspect that nearly everybody sitting in this House will struggle to recognise the extraordinarily rosy picture of the economy that the Minister just described. Just about every single one of the markets to which we export and to which our economy is usually tied are absolutely going...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 cc1239-1241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Lloyd George should be living at this hour. Here we have a Finance Bill introduced by the Minister where the only contributors are the Opposition Front Bench spokesmen. This is an indication of how limited the House’s role is in relation to Finance Bills, and justifiably so. As...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 cc1241-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I may have overshot the mark in my opening speech by being a little optimistic. I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, and the noble Lord, Lord Davies, for having well and truly rebalanced that perception. There are two potential reasons why there was not a long list...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2018
Reference
789 c1242
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
Date
28 February 2018
Reference
HL 85 2017-19
House
House of Lords

The hon. Gentleman is, as he knows, unfairly paraphrasing my hon. Friend the shadow Chief Secretary. What my hon. Friend has pointed out is that politics is about choices and that this Government have decided, through this set of proposals, to reduce the amount of tax the banks will pay,...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c226
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his intervention but, as I say, the central, key, cold, hard fact, which will not go away, is that financial services are paying £8 billion or £9 billion more in tax now than they were before. That is money that can be spent on...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 cc226-7
House
House of Commons

I feel that we have had this discussion in many of the debates on the many Finance Bills we have debated over the past 12 months. No one on the Opposition Benches denies the existence of the Laffer curve; we simply point out, as a point of fact, that the...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c227
House
House of Commons

Let me take each of those points in turn. The hon. Gentleman asserts that, had the corporation tax rate remained at 28%, we would now be collecting more than £53 billion. That is an assertion, and not one with which one can agree without contention. For example, because of the...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c227
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Peter Dowd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c227
House
House of Commons

Just a moment; let me respond to these two points.

Those companies had located their corporate headquarters outside the UK and so paid corporation tax outside the UK, but in response to the Government’s cutting the rate of tax, they came back onshore and now pay corporation tax here. It does...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c227
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c227
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman will let me answer his second point, I shall happily take an intervention. He suggested that, because the bank levy is a tax on a balance sheet, there is no Laffer curve effect. I dispute that. Banks are mostly international—for example, our largest bank, HSBC, is...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 cc227-8
House
House of Commons

I am extremely grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way. This argument is integral to the economic prosperity of the UK. On the point that he has just raised, I say clearly that we should wish to keep that substantial national asset, which is our financial services industry, in...

Member
Jonathan Reynolds (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c228
House
House of Commons

A number of points have been raised there. On the point about correlation and causation, of course I understand that they are not the same thing. However, in my remarks about corporation tax reductions, I did point to some of the causal links. The two causal links that I cited...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c228
House
House of Commons

The explanatory statement for new clause 3 says:

“This new clause requires the Government to carry out a review of the bank levy, including its effectiveness in relation to its stated aims, the revenue effects of the changes made in 2015 and the comparable effectiveness of the bank payroll tax.”

The stated...

Member
Peter Dowd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 February 2018
Reference
636 c229
House
House of Commons