Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Taxation

Legislation X
Trade Bill 2017-19
Member X
Lord Lansley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Moved by

Lord Lansley

61: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—

“Free Zones

(1) Within three months of the passing of this Act the Treasury must launch a consultation on proposals for the establishment in the United Kingdom of Free Zones, as defined by the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979.

(2) The...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1347-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in following the noble Lord’s remarks, perhaps I may say that the unreality of debates in Committee on this Bill will be exacerbated if we not only have amendments that, quite properly, raise relevant issues that are not presently included in the Bill but we then use them...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1341-2
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for this opportunity to raise the issue of free zones. I thought I was likely to end up moving this amendment at about 10 pm last Wednesday, so it is a pleasure to have it on in prime time but, recognising the value of this time, I...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1348-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord will observe that the amendment seeks a consultation on the part of the Treasury, and that consultation would undoubtedly enable these issues to be explored on an even-handed basis. In the scenario I was describing, any port would be free to come forward and seek designation. It...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c1349
House
House of Lords

Since there is no recent substantial experience of free zones, does my noble friend not think it would be helpful—if we arrive at the point where we exit the Union customs code—for the Government at least to initiate a consultation to look at the criteria that would be applied in...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c1350
House
House of Lords

Once again, I am grateful to my noble friend and that is a very welcome comment. I look forward to further discussion about that but, on that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c1350
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just want to say a word on this. I will not add much, because the noble Lord, Lord Purvis of Tweed, has illustrated the nature of the issues here very well. I would just emphasise that, if the Government are looking to vary Clause 6 as it...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1372-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what connects this group of amendments is that they are European Research Group’s amendments in the Commons that were accepted by the Government. I do not think they should be treated by my noble friends on the Front Bench as if they all had the same merit or...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1385-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if we are going to anticipate the longer group of amendments, which impact on Schedule 4, I will say a word about Amendments 103A and 107A, which are in my name.

I shared, I confess, the view of my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe for quite a long time. The...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1396-8
House
House of Lords

I am not clear. Is the noble Lord’s intention behind the amendment that the Upper Tribunal would look at the merits of the decision or simply at the processes? Are we simply talking about a judicial review process?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c1410
House
House of Lords

I agree that the public interest test is not defined anywhere, but is the economic interest test not defined in paragraph 23 of Schedule 5 to the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c1411
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, is absolutely right that the economic interest test is present in both Schedules 4 and 5 to the Taxation (Cross-border

Trade) Act. As set out there, the test seems to me to be capable of being, and is required under the legislation to be, taken...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 cc1413-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am speaking on behalf of my noble friend Lady Altmann, who is unable to be here and asked me to extend her apologies. I think she would have shared the view of the noble Lord, Lord Hannay, that Amendment 98 would not prevent our exit without an...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2019
Reference
795 c1419
House
House of Lords