Skip to main content

1-20 of 49 results for subject:Roads

Legislation X
High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill 2013-14 to 2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill 2013-14 to 2016-17 (49)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Notes
Hybrid Bill presented 25 November 2013.
Date
23 February 2017
Reference
CHAP 7 2017; 2017 c. 7

Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments 1 to 54 agreed to.

Lead member
Andrew Jones
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 cc817-836
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Andrew Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c817
House
House of Commons

Let me say right away that the majority of the amendments are technical clarifications, corrections and updated references. The Government accept all the amendments to the Bill made by the Lords. I will provide some comment on the amendments of substance. Before I do so, I would like to take...

Member
Andrew Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 cc817-8
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that there would be a desire, particularly in central London, to prevent any local transport authority, whether the local authority or Transport for London, from frustrating the building of the railway, but will the Minister give an assurance that the Secretary of State’s powers will be used sparingly?...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c818
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend makes an important point and I can give him the assurance he is looking for. The powers would only ever be used in a very sparing way, as he suggests is appropriate. Basically, the right way forward is for HS2 and the Department and local highways...

Member
Andrew Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c818
House
House of Commons

Although we may be seeking consensus, if there is disagreement, these provisions would ultimately give the Department for Transport the power to proceed by fiat and override the local authority or, indeed, local residents’ concerns, would they not?

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c818
House
House of Commons

The Bill certainly does give the Secretary of State the power, if required, to make TROs himself and to prohibit or revoke TROs that unnecessarily hinder the delivery of the railway. The answer to the right hon. Gentleman’s question is therefore yes, but we cannot allow a significant national project...

Member
Andrew Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 cc818-9
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to contribute to the progress of the Bill once again. I was fortunate enough to have been able to contribute to it in Committee, and I know the Minister will share my enthusiasm for the fact that this Bill will soon receive Royal Assent. High Speed 2...

Member
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c819
House
House of Commons

For purposes of clarification, HS2 was the brainchild of the last year of the last Labour Government. All previous Transport Ministers had treated it with considerable scepticism.

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c819
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for my right hon. Friend’s clarification, but if a party is in power, it is in power. Whether or not this happened in 2009 or 2010, Labour were still the Government of the day.

There are some points of disagreement between the Opposition and the Government on HS2—I...

Member
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c819
House
House of Commons

Is not the hon. Gentleman rather ignoring the fact that most Members are not affected by this project, so they show very little interest in it at all? If MPs’ constituencies are affected by the project, Members are of course passionately engaged. In fact, that consensus has really gone by...

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c819
House
House of Commons

Let me just say that this project benefits the entire country in its construction and its reach. I shall leave it there, Mr Deputy Speaker.

HS2 helps to address the severe capacity constraints on our rail network and improve connections between cities in the midlands and the north of England and...

Member
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 cc819-821
House
House of Commons

There are two more sentences, Mr Deputy Speaker.

HS2 does not have to be a Deutsche Bahn HS2 or an SNCF HS2 or Nederlandse Spoorwegen or Trenitalia state-run HS2, but it can be—if I may paraphrase the Prime Minister—a British red, white and blue HS2, and the Government should guarantee it.

Member
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c821
House
House of Commons

HS2 may well embrace young people’s entire careers, as the hon. Member for Middlesbrough (Andy McDonald) suggested, and they will have good careers out of it if it is built. However, I do not underestimate the fortunes being made—by the top echelons of HS2, certainly, but also by people who...

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 cc821-2
House
House of Commons

Anti-land grab amendment.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c822
House
House of Commons

My right hon. and learned Friend intervenes from a sedentary position, and he is right that this is an anti-land grab amendment.

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c822
House
House of Commons

I, as much as anybody else, have supported the right hon. Lady for a long time in respect of this scheme, and she raises an important point. I have constituents who cannot get a penny of compensation because they do not meet the necessary requirements. I think something very serious...

Member
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c822
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that intervention, and this is what has worried me about this project: it has been a David and Goliath project, and Goliath has won. It has crushed the spirit of so many people, and it is going to affect people who do not yet...

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c822
House
House of Commons

I take your admonition, Mr Deputy Speaker. I am trying to use these amendments to make the points that my constituents would expect to be made in the House. They do not understand that we have to try to stick exactly to the final letter, but I do understand that,...

Member
Cheryl Gillan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 February 2017
Reference
621 c823
House
House of Commons