Skip to main content

1-20 of 179 results for subject:"Freedom of information"

Legislation X
Statistics and Registration Service Bill 2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Statistics and Registration Service Bill 2006-07 (179)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 July 2007
Reference
CHAP 18 2007

Statistics and Registration Service Bill. Committee stage seventh sitting (morning). Clauses 36 to 44 agreed to. Schedule 2 agreed to.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
25 January 2007
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Following your lack of ruling on the word that the hon. Lady used, I would be interested to know whether it is appropriate to use that word as a noun, but not as an adjective.

Member
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Notes
The point of order is referring to the word 'shit'.
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c61
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time. I am pleased to open the debate on Second Reading of the Statistics and Registration Service Bill, which, for the first time in Britain, legislates for the independence of statistics. I am encouraged by the broad welcome...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c23
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to have the opportunity to discuss the Bill. There is common ground throughout the House that there is a need to do more to improve confidence in Government statistics. I do not think that anyone particularly feels that statisticians are in any way corrupt, misleading, dishonest...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c87-90
House
House of Commons

I shall come on to the Bill’s proposals for data sharing. I hope that the essential feature will reassure my hon. Friend: any arrangements proposed in future for greater sharing of administrative data will need to be agreed between the Department responsible and the new statistics board—and not only that,...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c24
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Financial Secretary is well aware of the importance of nationally collected statistics to the provision of local services. Many in local government give a broad and warm welcome to the measure, but they express some concerns about whether the Bill as drafted will facilitate effective co-operation...

Member
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c24
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is doing something that I counselled hon. Members not to do, by assuming that politicians act in that way to bury bad news. I am sure that sometimes they do, but it is not the case on most occasions. Politicians on both sides of the House who...

Member
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c59-61
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Lady. There is no doubt that there are problems in understanding complex statistics and that that makes some people hesitate to trust them. However, the much more serious problem is not the methodology or the complexity of the statistics but the way in which...

Member
Theresa Villiers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c42
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that cynicism about Government statistics is not new? Alan Clark recalled in his ““Diaries”” his view that the only useful purpose of the Department of Employment was to meet once a month to fiddle the employment and unemployment figures, and that it was probably the...

Member
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c34
House
House of Commons

The issue of public confidence comes down to how politicians manipulate the statistics that they are given. The hon. Lady is right in saying that if knife crime is on the increase, Ministers should be honest enough to say, ““Knife crime is on the increase, but break-ins are in decline.””...

Member
Brooks Newmark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c77-8
House
House of Commons

I hope that my hon. Friend is asking whether a Minister has made a policy change immediately after the pre-release. Obviously, if a Minister changed their policy two weeks after the statistics came out, that would be different.

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c90
House
House of Commons

Indeed. I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that clarification. On international comparisons, the hon. Member for Colne Valley (Kali Mountford) said that she was aware of only one European country that did not have some form of pre-release, but according to the information that I have seen, Austria,...

Member
David Gauke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c90-1
House
House of Commons

Tell us more.

Member
Rob Marris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c99
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to have the opportunity to respond to the debate on behalf of the Opposition, not only because of the quality of the speeches but because I have a specific interest in the future of the Office for National Statistics. Its Titchfield office is based in my constituency...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c98-9
House
House of Commons

It would be helpful if the Economic Secretary could confirm that there is now agreement with the Clerk of the House as to how the reports will be laid. Those who have read the written evidence to the Treasury Committee on the independence of the statistics know that that was...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c95-8
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow my hon. Friend the Member for South-West Hertfordshire (Mr. Gauke), who covered the Bill’s various clauses extremely well. I look forward to joining him in Committee next week, where we can pick up on some of the concerns that have been expressed. I welcome...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c91-5
House
House of Commons

I join the hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban) in paying tribute to speakers from both sides of the House in what has been a wide-ranging and informed debate. I shall do my best to do justice to the contributions from hon. Members from across the House. I thank them...

Member
Ed Balls (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c102-5
House
House of Commons

That reflects the complexity of data collection and the changing economy. The hon. Member for Slough talked about issues surrounding migration data and I recollect that one issue affecting data in around 2000 was the ability to capture transactions on the internet. That represented a move away from traditional sources...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c100-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for Wolverhampton, South-West (Rob Marris) should have been in his place to hear it, but I am sure that he will be able to read what was said in Hansard tomorrow. As my hon. Friend the Member for Chipping Barnet (Mrs. Villiers) made clear in her opening...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2007
Reference
455 c99-100
House
House of Commons