Skip to main content

1-20 of 81 results for subject:Evidence

Legislation X
Human Rights Act 1998

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Human Rights Act 1998 (81)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Hilary Benn
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Remedial orders
Date
14 October 2025
Reference
2025/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c884
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to open the debate and speak to the new clauses and amendments that stand in my name and those of my right hon. and hon. Friends. I am grateful to the Government for their co-operation on the programme motion, and to the Minister and his colleagues...

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc888-892
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c890
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak on new clauses 8 and 9, which stand in my name and that of my hon. Friend the Member for Ipswich (Tom Hunt).

Those who served on the Bill Committee will not be unfamiliar with the arguments I intend to address, as we rehearsed them at considerable...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc890-3
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that the events of Brexit showed the vivid importance of always maintaining the sovereignty of this place and respecting the will of the people?

Member
Marco Longhi (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c893
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The separation of powers does not deal with neutrality. It deals with different powers, which are, by constitutional arrangement, held by the courts and this place. The relationship between the two is critical. It is critical to our considerations today and more critical still to our constitution. A. V....

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c893
House
House of Commons

Is not the point of judicial review to make sure the Government comply with the

rules and restrictions set by Parliament? Restrictions on judicial review allow the Government to ride roughshod over Parliament’s views.

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c893
House
House of Commons

That is, of course, true, and it is why judicial review exists. The hon. Gentleman is right that there need to be checks and balances, but it is wrong to use judicial review to perpetuate matters of high politics or to perpetuate debates that have been settled in the country...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c894
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend confirm that these new clauses would, in effect, stop judicial review departing from a narrow focus on a particular public Act and becoming a free-ranging inquiry into Government decision making?

Member
Sally-Ann Hart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c894
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes the point more eloquently than I ever could, partly due to her expertise. The real point is that these cases have created the possibility of a much more wide-ranging rebalancing and reappraisal of the relationship between the courts and Parliament, without public consent—indeed, the public have...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc894-5
House
House of Commons

The difficulty I have with the right hon. Gentleman’s argument is this: where facts are in dispute, how can a court be expected to rule on a point of law without hearing evidence?

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c895
House
House of Commons

The court can take evidence, but what it should not be doing is fishing for further information, of a wider variety, which opens up consideration of the original process, rather than checking whether that process was right and proper; it is a subtle difference but a fundamental one in terms...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 c895
House
House of Commons

Much of this Bill has no impact on Scotland or our separate courts and legal system, so our amendments and my comments are focused on the parts that do, which primarily deal with judicial review. The parts of the Bill I will address today are not just bad; they are...

Member
Anne McLaughlin (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc895-8
House
House of Commons

I would like to congratulate the hon. Member for North Shropshire (Helen Morgan) on her wonderful maiden speech and welcome her to her seat in this place. She talked about this historic Chamber, but of course she herself has made history by being the first Lib Dem and the first...

Member
Paula Barker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc899-901
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Member for North Shropshire (Helen Morgan) for her excellent maiden speech, and for her excellent and pretty amazing by-election victory.

I rise to speak to amendments 1 to 3, 5 and 37, which stand in my name and those of other hon. Members. My sponsorship of these...

Member
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc901-2
House
House of Commons

There has been a lot of turmoil on the Government Benches over the past few weeks—partygate, allegations of blackmail and now Islamophobia. But one thing remains consistent and there is one thing we can count on: the Government have their eyes set on authoritarian rule.

Just look at the recent legislation...

Member
Janet Daby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc902-3
House
House of Commons

I take this opportunity to welcome my new colleague, my hon. Friend the Member for North Shropshire (Helen Morgan), to these Benches. I congratulate her on the excellent speech she made today.

I rise to speak to the Liberal Democrat amendments 1 to 5. The Government claim that the Bill will...

Member
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc903-5
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to a number of amendments and new clauses, in particular new clause 4, which corresponds with the commitment in the 2019 Labour manifesto to ensure legal aid for inquests into deaths in state custody—a commitment first announced in February 2019 by my hon. Friend the Member...

Member
Apsana Begum (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc905-6
House
House of Commons

May I start by picking up a point that the hon. Member for North Shropshire (Helen Morgan) made in her excellent maiden speech, on which I congratulate her? If nothing else, recent events reassure us that our constituents quite rightly do not like the Prime Minister, the Government or any...

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
707 cc906-8
House
House of Commons