Skip to main content

1-50 of 136 results for subject:Roads

Legislation X
Highways Act 1980

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Highways Act 1980 (136)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Frequently Asked Questions about parking policy across the UK, including council-controlled on-road parking, parking on private land, and parking for disabled people.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
CBP-8736

There will be a Westminster Hall debate on the condition of roads in rural areas on 17 March 2026. The debate will be opened by Stuart Anderson MP (Conservative, South Shropshire).

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
CBP-10586

This paper explains what private or ‘unadopted’ roads are and the problems and issues associated with them. It also explains who is responsible for maintaining these roads and how highways authorities can ‘adopt’ such roads and make them public highways.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
SN00402

The Department for Transport’s (DfT) Road Safety Strategy was published in January 2026.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
28 January 2026
Reference
CDP-2026-0022

Clause 21 agreed to. Amendment to clause 22, discussed with new clause 102 (Community benefits from major energy infrastructure projects), negatived on division (5 votes to 12). Clauses 22 to 35 agreed to. Clause 36 under consideration when the Committee adjourned.

Lead member
Matthew Pennycook; Michael Shanks
Answering member
David Simmonds; Paul Holmes
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government; Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Committee
Date
13 May 2025
House
House of Commons

The Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-2025 had its First Reading in the House of Commons on 11 March 2025. Second Reading is scheduled for 24 March 2025. The Bill, and its Explanatory Notes, can be found on the Parliamentary website.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 March 2025
Reference
CBP-10216

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of amending the Highways Act 1980 to increase roadside trees planting.

Asked by
Jerome Mayhew (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
32188
House
House of Commons
Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Presentation bills
Date
21 October 2024
Reference
Bill 86 2024-26
House
House of Commons
Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Presentation bills
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
Bill 109 2023-24
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to s.142(8) of the Highways Act 1980, if he will bring forward legislative proposals to indemnify local authorities against claims for damages caused by planters and parklets placed in the carriageway by residents in agreement with the local authority as...

Asked by
Darren Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2023
Reference
190711
House
House of Commons

Lord report stage second day. Amendment 47 agreed to on division (285 to 208). Amendment 48 disagreed to on division (240 to 254). Amendment 50 disagreed to on division (239 to 248). Amendment 54 agreed to on division (283 to 192). Amendment 56 agreed to on division (259 to 200)....

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1097-1157
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Paddick

46: Leave out Clause 10

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1098
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to move Amendment 46 in my name and to speak to Amendment 47, to which I have added my name. Amendment 46 would remove Clause 10 from the Bill; I am grateful for the support of the noble Baronesses, Lady Chakrabarti and Lady Meacher, and the...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1098-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this House is wonderful. Your Lordships have heard from a former police officer exactly what the police think of this and how they will handle, or possibly mishandle, it; we are shortly to hear from a lawyer who has experienced court cases about this sort of thing; and...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1099-1100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise in support of my noble friend Lord Coaker and of my friend the distinguished former police officer and consistent advocate for rights and freedoms, the noble Lord, Lord Paddick. Stop and search is always a vexed question; even stop and search with reasonable suspicion is a...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1100-1
House
House of Lords

This being not Committee but Report, the simplest and speediest answer that I can give to the noble Lord’s question is that Clause 11 is about suspicionless stop and search. He has picked out a particular subsection in the scheme, which would have been interesting in Committee. But the crucial...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1101
House
House of Lords

He is called the noble Lord, Lord Deben.

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1106
House
House of Lords

It is in Suffolk.

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 47 in my name, for which I am grateful for the support of the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, the

noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti, and the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Manchester. Just in case I forget, I say now that I...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1108-1110
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend Lord Anderson for that important point.

My example is that around Parliament Square, we have a designated area. Your Lordships, passing through it, can be stopped. I think that the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, has often mentioned that sometimes you have no idea that you are...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1110-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, seeks to remove the suspicion-led stop and search measure from the Bill, while that tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Coaker, seeks to remove the suspicionless stop and search measure. I understand the strength of feeling expressed by all...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1111-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken from all sides of the House and of the debate, from former police officers to the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, who was arrested at a protest.

The noble Lord, Lord Wolfson of Tredegar, made a great play on John Lewis. I...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1113
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

47: Leave out Clause 11

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1113
House
House of Lords

I beg to move.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1113
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

48: Before Clause 15, insert the following new Clause—

“Imposing conditions on public processions: serious disruption

(1) Section 12 of the Public Order Act 1986 (imposing conditions on public processions) is amended as follows.

(2) After subsection (2) insert—

“(2ZA) In considering for the purposes of subsection (1)(a) whether a...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1114-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we now turn back to government Amendments 48 to 51, which relate to the definition of serious disruption within Sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986 and the reasonable excuse defence with regard to the offences of wilful obstruction of the highway and public nuisance....

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1119-1120
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

50: After Clause 16, insert the following new Clause—

“Wilful obstruction of highway

In section 137 of the Highways Act 1980 (penalty for wilful obstruction), after subsection (1) insert—

“(1ZA) Subsection (1ZB) applies where—

(a) a person wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway, and

(b) the obstruction causes or...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1124
House
House of Lords

I beg to move.

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1124
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Chakrabarti

54: After Clause 18, insert the following new Clause—

“Protection for journalists and others monitoring protests

A constable may not exercise any police power for the principal purpose of preventing a person from observing or otherwise reporting on a protest or the exercise of police powers in relation to—

(a) a...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1128
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we now come to the totally uncontroversial matter of protecting journalists from abuse of police power. This is an amendment in my name and also those of the noble Baroness, Lady Boycott, the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead. We...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1128
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I disagree very strongly with the noble Lord, because I think he is wrong. Once you give the police the idea that it is okay to arrest a journalist, why would we expect them to understand—you cannot deny that the police quite often misuse the law because they...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1130
House
House of Lords

I speak as the mother of a journalist, so I have a vested interest here, but journalists do not go along to protests to join them but to watch and report on them. The Hertfordshire police and crime commissioner, David Lloyd, with whom I had the displeasure of sharing a...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1130
House
House of Lords

They have cards.

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1130
House
House of Lords

I wonder if I could help the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, because he has not, with respect, read the amendment—or at least not very carefully. To be clear, there would be nothing to prevent the arrest of a journalist, filmmaker, legal observer or anybody else if the officer suspected the...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1132
House
House of Lords

I would like to follow what my noble friend just said, or at least the beginning of his remarks following the speech by the noble

Baroness, Lady Boycott. If the Chinese Communist Party, through its quisling administration in Hong Kong, was introducing legislation like this, we would denounce it. The...

Member
Lord Patten of Barnes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1132
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there cannot be any legitimate objection to journalists, legal observers, academics or even members of the public who want to observe and report on protests or on the police’s use of their powers related to protests. We have seen in incident after incident how video footage of police...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is something to be said for semaphore in the wider sense. That is, one of the problems that I think many noble Lords have had with the Bill is that it is sending a signal, as the noble Lord, Lord Patten, just suggested, against freedom of expression....

Member
Lord Berkeley of Knighton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1133-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we support the amendment moved by my noble friend Lady Chakrabarti and if she divides the House, we will support her in the Division Lobbies. As the noble Lord, Lord Cormack, said, a free press is the hallmark of a democratic society; we should remind ourselves of that....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1134
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for my slightly tardy arrival.

Amendment 54, tabled by the noble Baronesses, Lady Chakrabarti and Lady Boycott, and the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, seeks to establish a specific safeguard for journalists and bystanders during protests. It follows the wrongful arrest and detention of the LBC journalist Charlotte...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1134-5
House
House of Lords

My noble and learned friend makes a very fair point, but the College of Policing and the National Union of Journalists awareness training is a little more recent than the 40 year-old PACE codes.

The College of Policing’s initial learning curriculum includes a package of content on effectively dealing with the...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1135-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this short but vital debate. Once more to respond to the noble Lord, Lord Hogan-Howe, who I am not sure has read the amendment—

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1136
House
House of Lords

This amendment is not about preventing the arrest of anybody, journalist or otherwise, who is reasonably suspected of committing a criminal offence, including offences in this Bill. There is no definitional problem, because what is defined is the purpose of the arrest, not the identity of the person. This is...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1136-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Anderson of Ipswich

56: Clause 19, page 22, line 20, leave out sub-paragraphs (iii) to (v)

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would limit the trigger events for an SDPO to the commission of a protest-related offence and the breach of a protest-related injunction.

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to propose a number of amendments to Part 2 of the Bill, which provides for serious disruption prevention orders, or SDPOs. These are civil orders, breach of which is punishable by imprisonment. Imposed by magistrates at the request of the police, their intended effect is to...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1137-1142
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have heard, most of the amendments in this group seek to restrict the proposed provisions in serious disruption prevention orders so that they are more in line with terrorism prevention and investigation measures. TPIMs are

primarily designed for instances where the case against someone who is...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1143-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to be clear at the outset, we will support Amendment 56 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, and I will not divide the House on Amendment 59. I shall speak to Amendment 63, which is tabled in my name and has cross-party and Cross-Bench support.

I...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1145
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this shortish debate. This group contains notices to oppose, so I will start with those amendments which take issue with serious disruption prevention orders as a whole. The feeling expressed by noble Lords when speaking to these amendments is...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1145-6
House
House of Lords

I will need to clarify that but, given the other things that I have said, it would imply—I stress “imply”—that the person needed to be there, but I will come back on that point.

I also stress that those who make their voices heard without committing offences or causing serious disruption...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1146-8
House
House of Lords

The Minister will recall that I described my Amendments 57 and 61 as clarificatory. It seemed to me that the Government must surely have not intended that a second or subsequent SDPO made in respect of the same person could be founded on trigger events that had already been taken...

Member
Lord Anderson of Ipswich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1148
House
House of Lords

I can clarify that that is the Government’s understanding.

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2023
Reference
827 c1148
House
House of Lords