Skip to main content

1-20 of 34 results for house:"House of Lords"

Legislation X
Health Act 1999
Subject X
Public consultation

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Health Act 1999 (34)

Subject

More
Public consultation (34)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am very glad to follow the noble Lord, Lord Winston, because he directs us to the central issue, of how we seek to ensure the safety of patients in all circumstances. What he was describing illustrates the essence of the relationship of a physician associate—or, for that matter, an...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc896-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as the chair of the General Dental Council. It is not for me to comment extensively on matters affecting a fellow healthcare professional regulator, but I will say one thing directly in response to what the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, said about the substance...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc898-900
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin with a slight disagreement with the noble Lord, Lord Harris. I take his point about how dental professionals, not just dentists, are regulated by the GDC, but I agree with the comment from the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, about the impression it would give if other...

Member
Lord Patel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc899-901
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to be fair, I said that that Act had been subsequently amended by the Health and Care Act 2022. If you do not have flexibility through regulation, you will never get anything done in relation to modernising health regulation. Governments simply do not find time in primary legislation...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c901
House
House of Lords

I hope they do find time, because that allows for better scrutiny and better ability to amend, which we always claim to be our key role—to scrutinise and amend. It is a major piece of legislation to go through using SIs, and it is inappropriate to do so. Maybe we...

Member
Lord Patel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c901
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Patel, just said many very important things, with which I agree, far better than I would. I thank the noble Baronesses, Lady Bennett, Lady Brinton and Lady Finlay, because this debate has revealed the importance of this order: it is not a minor regulatory...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc901-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this Motion and, not for the first time in a debate on health, I find myself in almost complete agreement with the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, and the remarks he made earlier in an extremely powerful speech. We are exemplifying the right debate here, in that...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc903-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that my noble friend the Minister will not mind if I say that I am very grateful to the noble Baronesses, Lady Bennett, Lady Brinton and Lady Finlay, for the regret amendments and this debate today. Secondary legislation comes through the House and too often we...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc904-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak very briefly in favour of these regulations. I am absolutely in favour of any way in which we can leverage the ability of our doctors to concentrate on what they want to do, and what they have been highly and expensively trained to do, which...

Member
Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c905
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened to the debate very carefully. My professional experience as a former health service manager over many years is that

we have had this debate about people taking on different roles in health and always the same arguments come. Whether it be physiotherapists taking on roles,...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc905-6
House
House of Lords

Bennett.

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c906
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness, Lady Bennett of Manor Castle—I remembered the Manor Castle because of Sheffield, but I could not remember the Bennett bit—that, twice during her contribution, she used the term “a second-rate service”. These people do not provide a second-rate service; they provide and augment the team service, to...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c906
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this statutory instrument has triggered a debate that I think is happening on multiple levels. There are two meta questions around the structure of the medical professions, writ large, and the legislative process for establishing professional regulations and updating these over time. This is something on which the...

Member
Lord Allan of Hallam (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc906-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point that the noble Lord, Lord Allan, has just made about respect for the professionals we are speaking about is a very good one for me to follow on from, because I believe we are at our most vulnerable when we are in the care of the...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc908-911
House
House of Lords

I thank all the noble Lords for their contributions. The wide range of views and experience shows the House at its best. On the serious point of the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett, about making sure that there was a full debate, I hope noble Lords feel that this is a...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc912-3
House
House of Lords

It is in your order.

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c913
House
House of Lords

That is something I will pick up on. On the point raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Fox, I say that the GMC, with the CQC, should be able to give the ongoing quality assurance.

The noble Lord, Lord Hunt, said very well that the discussion on mistakes has not been...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 cc913-4
House
House of Lords

I hesitate to rise because the House clearly wants to end the debate, but I am not sure whether the Minister, in summing up, said whether the titles of physician associate and anaesthesia associate will be protected titles when the order goes through. Are they negotiable? I ask that question...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c914
House
House of Lords

It is a protected title. The point I was trying to make about the general overhaul and understanding of the titles, however, is that there will be the scope to do this, as doctors and consultants are not protected titles today. I think we need to develop clarity on that,...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c914
House
House of Lords

Sorry about prolonging the debate, but is that the only protected title of all healthcare professionals?

Member
Lord Patel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2024
Reference
836 c914
House
House of Lords