Skip to main content

1-20 of 488 results for house:"House of Commons"

Legislation X
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Subject X
Planning permission

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07 (488)
More

Subject

More
Planning permission (488)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 October 2007
Reference
DEP 07/2247
House
House of Commons

It will be the last time. I would be grateful if the Minister would clarify a comment that he made earlier, when I asked him whether there was any town or city in the UK where the council had to pass the budget by two thirds. Can he tell us?

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c497
House
House of Commons

No. I am sorry. I am finishing on that point. For the reasons that I have set out, I urge my hon. Friends to disagree with the amendment made in the other place. Question put, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment:— The House divided: Ayes...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c497
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c497
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c500
House
House of Commons

We have reached a group of amendments that the Government tabled in the other place in response to the debate that took place there and in this House. The amendments constitute useful additions and, in some places, important strengthening of the provisions. I pay tribute to hon. Members in both...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c501
House
House of Commons

The Minister and I are in accord on the amendments and I am grateful to him for the spirit in which he moved them. I agree that they are sensible and improve the Bill. They attracted support from all quarters when they were discussed previously. I highlight amendment No. 3...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c501
House
House of Commons

I, too, support the amendments. If I were being churlish, I would question the reason for missing out local authorities the first time from the health inequalities strategy, given their prominent role in sport, care for the elderly and so on. However, I do not want to be churlish, so...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c501-2
House
House of Commons

Like other hon. Members, I support what the Government are trying to achieve. However, in view of the many planning measures that will be introduced, I hope that there will be a culture of greater transparency, especially on housing-related matters. I speak with a constituency interest in mind about the...

Member
Mark Field (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c502
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c502
House
House of Commons

Perhaps I could just say that I want very much to echo what my hon. Friend the Member for Cities of London and Westminster (Mr. Field) has said. In supporting and welcoming the spirit of the amendment, I think that I speak for a lot of people in this Chamber...

Member
Boris Johnson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c502
House
House of Commons

I think that everybody in the House wants to see a mayoralty that responds to the wishes of local communities and that works with the boroughs and not against them in imposing planning decisions that go against the wishes of locally elected politicians. That is exactly the direction in which...

Member
Boris Johnson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c503
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. If an hon. Member is going to make a contribution in such a debate, should they not at least know what is under discussion?

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c502
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c503
House
House of Commons

In this group we propose a number of amendments to the planning clauses of the Bill, following useful and valuable scrutiny undertaken in this House and the other place. Lords amendment No. 16 introduces new clause 2E, which introduces into the Bill the requirement for the Mayor to give the...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c503-4
House
House of Commons

As someone who did not serve on the Bill Committee I am perhaps not as au fait with this matter as I should be. Will the Minister give the House a couple of scenarios in which the Mayor might get involved?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c504
House
House of Commons

I have.

Member
Boris Johnson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c503
House
House of Commons

I welcome the hon. Gentleman to the debate. We missed his contribution and his presence in earlier debates. May I tell him that he was in fact speaking to the next group of amendments? We are talking about housing strategy and health, but we will come to planning next. I...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c503
House
House of Commons

I should like to deal with the detail of the amendments fairly briefly, before coming to the underlying principle, on which our stance is different. I do not quarrel with the detail of the amendments that the Minister has put forward. It is obviously right and sensible to place the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c504-5
House
House of Commons

The provisions in the Bill allow for the Mayor to get involved in major developments and applications that might have a wider, strategic significance. In the amendments, and in the Bill, we are keen to ensure that decisions are taken at the appropriate level, and that wherever appropriate local boroughs...

Member
John Healey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2007
Reference
464 c504
House
House of Commons