Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,304 results for subject:Registration

Legislation X
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06 (1,304)
More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1450
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
CHAP 22 2006

If the Bill were to be passed in the near future—I share the Minister’s wish that it is—but with the Lords amendment included, can the Minister confirm that that would not delay the implementation and that we could still use it for next year’s elections?

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons

I am not sure that I can give that confirmation. As I mentioned in reference to the postal vote identifier, which will cover 12 to 15 per cent. of the electorate, the work that has to be done by the EROs and the administrators in order to get things up...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons

I am usually reluctant to intervene on the hon. Gentleman in his opening remarks, but that is the second time in this debate that he has used the banana republic example. That was the 2004 election and, after that, we put in place a number of measures to secure the...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c297
House
House of Commons

I congratulate Baroness Hanham on her success in prevailing again in the other place. The background to our first debate in October was the widespread electoral fraud in Birmingham, which had led a judge to say that the systematic fraud there"““would disgrace a banana republic””."

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c297
House
House of Commons

What about the possible situation of merchant seamen in my constituency, who might be away for voyages of five months and then find themselves coming home just before an election? How would the proposal for signatures affect those kinds of people?

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend accept that, in any case, in such circumstances an electoral registration officer could take a view on that and dispense with the requirement? That is part of the amendment.

Member
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298
House
House of Commons

The people whom the hon. Gentleman represents would register to vote in October, I imagine, as others do. At the moment, they do not have to provide a signature at that point; in future, they would. When they voted, they would also have to provide a signature, because that is...

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298
House
House of Commons

Just for the record, we are with the Government on the amendment.

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c299
House
House of Commons

Yes. I was not sure whether the hon. Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Mr. MacNeil) was suggesting that some of his constituents cannot sign their names, because clearly there would need to be provision for that, which is what we have suggested. I will continue with the long list....

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298-9
House
House of Commons

We all know that sometimes contests are tight and that there can occasionally be grudge contests, such as the recent one in the east end of London. Must the ERO always investigate an allegation? One could envisage hundreds of challenges being made at the last minute because people realised that...

Member
Robert Syms (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c294
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes a valid point. I think we should allow for a variety of elections to take place so that we can have a fairly comprehensive view of the reaction to all the measures. I would not like to put a specific time on that, but I...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons

The Minister knows that I asked to see the responses to the Government’s consultation paper, ““Electoral Administration. A Policy Paper for Discussion””, last October. They were placed in the Library on Monday, eight months later. Why did it take so long?

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c295
House
House of Commons

I am aware of that academic’s evidence to the Committee. EROs with whom I have held discussions do not accept the detail of his evidence, although we are aware from a variety of sources that there are people who should be on the register but are not. Of course, if...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c294-5
House
House of Commons

Will the Government take responsibility for a comprehensive canvass, given Dr. Michael Pinto-Duschinsky’s evidence to the Committee on Standards in Public Life that there were 7 million errors on the register for England and Wales alone? He stated that there were 3.5 million names that should not have been on...

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c294
House
House of Commons

I understand the point that the hon. Gentleman makes and the mischief that could be created if that were to happen. But there is the five-day period, so people would not be able to try to disrupt things in that way on polling day. The ERO can take complaints up...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c294
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give the House a little more information about the review? Does she envisage it taking place a year hence, or perhaps two or three years hence? What time scale needs to elapse before a worthwhile review could be undertaken?

Member
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons

As I said, the documents are now available. It can take time to give due weight and to analyse in detail the meaning of such responses and what people are trying to get across to Government. I accept that eight months is a long time and we would have preferred...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c295-6
House
House of Commons

The Minister published a summary of the responses in October, but I wanted to see the actual responses. I cannot understand why it took eight months, from October to June, to produce the real documents.

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c295
House
House of Commons