Skip to main content

1-20 of 229 results for subject:Death

Legislation X
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06 (229)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The hon. Gentleman mentioned the MORI poll, which I think was conducted in May and June. Is he worried that such scientific research was conducted during a period in which there was wall-to-wall coverage in the press and on radio and television about postal ballot fraud? Surely, if changes are...

Member
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c185
House
House of Commons

We welcome the intention of the Bill and the Government’s belated recognition that all is not well in our once-envied electoral system. It is in urgent need of attention because there is much work to be done following years of neglect. While we support many of the Bill’s provisions, there...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c184-5
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment No. 14, in clause 9, page 6, line 15, at end insert—

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c184
House
House of Commons

May I tell the hon. Gentleman that the figures for under-registration are in the public domain and were produced by the Electoral Commission in September? The figure is between 3.5 million and 4 million people. If single signature or unique identifiers go ahead, there could be a further 10 per...

Member
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c187-8
House
House of Commons

I do not have those figures, but I would be delighted to hear them from the Minister.

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c187
House
House of Commons

Obviously, the rules can encourage under-registration or over-registration. Has the hon. Gentleman sized those two different problems? What is the percentage of over-registration compared with the percentage of under-registration for any one given register?

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c187
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes an important point—I agree—but our position is that the integrity of the register in itself must be the priority. If there is no integrity within the electoral register, people’s confidence in the system will only decline over time.

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c187
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for getting on to the terms of amendment No. 14. I understand that, under the 2000 legislation, electors are removed from the register and safeguards are in place, especially where no electoral registration form is returned. What additional over-registration is the hon. Gentleman trying to...

Member
Andrew Love (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c188
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend: there can be over and under-representation on the same register, but the priority is to ensure that the register is as accurate as possible. That is the starting block of our democracy. The amendment would ensure that registration officers had a clear duty to...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c188
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that one can have under-registration and over-registration at the same time, because some people, as the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) suggested, might be registered more than once without such an entitlement? The Government were happy to introduce a Northern Ireland...

Member
Andrew Turner (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c188
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has been dying to give that statistic, and he has now given it.

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c188
House
House of Commons

No, I shall make headway. Longer-term analysis by the Electoral Commission suggests that there is a disfranchised generation that, as it gets older, will not turn out in greater numbers. We hear little as to what the Government propose to do about that. Increasing political awareness and interest must surely...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c186-7
House
House of Commons

There is a fundamental difficulty with that. If someone’s name is inappropriately on the electoral register and he votes, he may commit an offence, but if someone’s name is not on the electoral register, he has no recourse and is precluded from voting by the absence of his name.

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c187
House
House of Commons

That is an issue that we shall come to later. We must be careful not to confuse the overriding need to preserve the integrity of the electoral system with the important but nevertheless secondary issue of increasing voter turnout. The registration process should provide an accurate, comprehensive and secure foundation...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c185-6
House
House of Commons

I hope that my question is precisely on the matter for debate. One issue involving clear mischief is the repetition of names, either because people have moved and should have come off the register at address A when they registered at address B, or because they have registered in the...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c185
House
House of Commons

We believe that and we support the provisions that say it, but we want electoral registration officers also to be responsible for ensuring that people who should not be on the roll are not on it. Indeed, the integrity of the system is, from our point of view, the priority...

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c186
House
House of Commons

I want to ask the hon. Gentleman to address an essential point. Do the Opposition believe that it should be a priority for electoral registration officers to maximise the number of people on the register, to ensure the highest possible turnout at elections?

Member
Andrew Love (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c186
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a good point that I will make on a later group of amendments. I believe that the answer is none or a negligible number.

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c186
House
House of Commons

There is a legal duty to return the electoral registration form. Over the past five years, how many people have been fined for not doing so?

Member
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c186
House
House of Commons

I cannot, but I would be interested to hear those figures from the Minister.

Member
Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
439 c186
House
House of Commons