Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Evidence

Legislation X
Arbitration Act 1996
Subject X
Jurisdiction

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Arbitration Act 1996 (20)
More

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage. Clause 1, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 2 to 10 agreed to. Clause 11, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 12 to 18 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 59).

Lead member
Lord Bellamy
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Department
Ministry of Justice; Arbitration Bill (HL) Special Public Bill Committee
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc681-12
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Bellamy

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 13, leave out “, of itself,”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment does not change the effect of the provision, and follows comments from respondents to the Committee’s call for evidence that the omitted words are unnecessary and cause confusion.

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c681
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 1 to Clause 1, I extend my thanks and appreciation first to the Law Commission for all the work that has gone into the preparation of this Bill and secondly to the many stakeholders who submitted evidence to the Special Public Bill Committee, as well...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc681-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will briefly make a few observations. First, I thank the clerk of the Committee, who has been invaluable to us all and extremely diligent in the work that he has done. One will have the opportunity no doubt to thank him again at a further stage of...

Member
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc2-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to add to what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas, has just said, and I add my thanks to everyone that he thanked. I express the deep gratitude of the Members of the Committee that he so ably led for his chairmanship throughout, his inspired...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc3-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too thank the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas. I have indeed had an amusing and interesting excursion into the world of arbitration. I sit on this Committee as a layman and it has been interesting to hear through various submissions the expert views of so many...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I again associate myself and the Government with the thanks to everyone that have been enunciated this morning, particularly to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas, for his chairmanship of the Committee. One point that arises from the remarks that have been made is the question that...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I say how grateful I am to the Minister for his last remarks? It is a misfortune in the experience of those who are lawyers that sometimes someone only sees a point at the very last minute. It is not unusual and no one is to be...

Member
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Mendelsohn

2: After Clause 6, insert the following new Clause—

“Amendment to the Arbitration Act 1996 (General Principles)

In Section 1 of the Arbitration Act 1996, after paragraph (c) insert—

“(d) an arbitration tribunal must not purport to exceed its jurisdiction in accordance with the Act and, in particular, must not make...

Member
Lord Mendelsohn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the opportunity to place this amendment before this Special Public Bill Committee. I am not highly experienced with such hybrid procedures and so, while I hope that your Lordships will guide me, you will be pleased to hear that I will also use brevity....

Member
Lord Mendelsohn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc5-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for his amendment and his remarks. The Government are entirely clear that arbitration tribunals should confine themselves to their jurisdiction and to matters properly subject to that arbitration. That is clear from the Arbitration Act 1996 itself, which provides a regime for the...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c6
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that assurance and beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Lord Mendelsohn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Bellamy

3: Clause 11, page 6, line 29, at end insert “subject to the court ruling otherwise in the interests of justice”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment provides that court rules within subsection (3C) restricting the raising of new grounds for objection, the consideration of new evidence or the rehearing of...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendments 4 to 7 to Clause 11, which, effectively, enables certain procedural reforms to take place in procedures under Section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996, where a party challenges an arbitral award before the court on the basis that the tribunal had...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I warmly support the amendments and I thank the Minister for bringing them forward. I commend parliamentary counsel on the elegance with which they have drafted the short amendments needed.

This is by far the most important matter before the Committee because it has been a fundamental principle of...

Member
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everything that the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas, has said. I have one or two small points to add. The first concerns his allusion to the need to be clear. We heard earlier from him and the noble Lord, Lord Ponsonby, about how important...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc8-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their support for these amendments, which I commend to the Committee.

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 c9
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Bellamy

4: Clause 11, page 6, line 35, leave out first “heard by” and insert “put before”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment makes clear that the evidence mentioned in subsection (3C)(b) includes written evidence as well as oral evidence.

5: Clause 11, page 6, line 35, leave out second “heard” and insert...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc9-10
House
House of Lords

This clause seeks to remove the special provisions in relation to domestic arbitration from the Act, and it is entirely right to do so. However, it gives rise to a question that needs to be addressed, particularly because the broad powers of the court are being removed in respect of...

Member
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc10-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in view of the noble and learned Lord’s indication that he is not pressing for the removal of these clauses—which, incidentally, have never been brought into effect—I will say a word

or two about the important underlying issue that he raised about corruption. This was raised in the...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2024
Reference
837 cc11-2
House
House of Lords