Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for house:"House of Lords"

Legislation X
Child Support Act 1991
Session X
1993-94

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Child Support Act 1991 (17)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

How many complaints of fraud have been made by parents subject to Child Support Act 1991. (a) by absent parents against caring parents; (b) by caring parents against absent parents; and what action has followed from these complaints. - Includes fact that information requested is not recorded.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 1994
Reference
557 c88WA
House
House of Lords

If HMGovt have any evidence to suggest that Child Support Act 1991 has increased amount of litigation between parents subject to it, and, if not, if they will make any attempt to collect evidence on this point.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 July 1994
Reference
557 c63WA
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on case on Merseyside.
Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 May 1994
Reference
555 c350
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 1994
Reference
555 c350
House
House of Lords
If it is impossible for parents with care and receiving maintenance under provision sof Child Support Act 1991 to be worse off than if they are receiving benefit. -
Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
19 May 1994
Reference
555 c350
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 May 1994
Reference
555 c350
House
House of Lords

How many absent parents on income support have had 5% deducted from their income support under the Child Support Act 1991. - Inc text of letter from Michael Bichard of Benefits Agency.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Social Security Benefits Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 1994
Reference
554 c50-1WA
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 1994
Reference
554 c666-7
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on protected income and cost of season tickets.
Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 1994
Reference
554 c666-7
House
House of Lords
Whether it is true, as stated by Mrs. Ros Hepplewhite on the Jimmy Young Show on 1st March, that for parents paying maintenance under the Child Support Act 1991 "the formula makes it impossible for you to be worse off than if you were on the dole". -
Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 1994
Reference
554 c666-7
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 1994
Reference
554 c666-7
House
House of Lords

If HMGovt will give guidance to Child Support Agency that they should not issue assessments to members of Armed Forces while they are on active service, and if they will promote consultations between Dept of Social Security and Ministry of Defence about effect of Child Support Act 1991 on Armed...

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 1994
Reference
554 c36WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will ensure that parents assessed to receive maintenance under the Child Support Act 1991 do not lose income support until maintenance is actually received. - Text of letter from Michael Bichard of the Benefits Agency.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Social Security Benefits Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 March 1994
Reference
552 c92WA
House
House of Lords

Whether HMG accept the recommendation of the House of Commons Social Security Select Committee that reviews and appeals under the Child Support Act 1991 should be processed within 28 days. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 1994
Reference
552 c68WA
House
House of Lords

Why, under the Child Support Act 1991, a care allowance is payable by the ex-husband for the support of a woman who has remarried, and whether her maintenance should not rather be regarded as the responsibility of her existing husband.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 1994
Reference
552 c69WA
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on unstarred question asking HMG whether they are planning any amendments to the Child Support Act 1991.

Lead member
Earl Russell
Answering member
Viscount Astor
Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
9 February 1994
Reference
551 c1657-88
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Child Support (Miscellaneous Amendments & Transitional Provisions) Regulations 1994. (Affirmative instrument). Approved by Parliament. Made 3 February 1994 (SI 1994/227). Coming into force 7 February 1994.

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
13 January 1994
Reference
SI 1994/227
House
House of Commons; House of Lords