Skip to main content

1-20 of 551 results for subject:"Land use"

Legislation X
Planning Bill 2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Planning Bill 2007-08 (551)
More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 November 2008
Reference
CHAP 29 2008

Planning Bill. Commons reasons for disagreeing to certain Lords amendments considered. Lords amendments not insisted on.

Lead member
Baroness Andrews
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1350-68
House
House of Lords

My Lords, clearly this matter has different resonance in different parts of the country. In my area, suburban London, it is a major issue. I readily agree that it is a multi-faceted issue; it cannot be divorced from the matter of getting homes built that offer a good quality of...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1355
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 115, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 115A. Yesterday the other place rejected by a majority of over 70 the amendment put forward by this House to amend the Town and...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1350-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, since garden grabbing was debated and voted on in this House on Report, our amendment on the issue was debated yesterday in another place and, predictably, thrown out. During the debate, there was strong support from all parties for the need to protect gardens and open spaces. Indeed,...

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1352-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful for the welcome given to the idea of a review. I was intrigued by the metaphor of the long grass. We will make sure that the grass is cut regularly and that the timetable for the review is fit for purpose. I would be...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1355-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 160, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 160A. Lords Amendment No. 160 was considered by the other place on 24 November. The other place disagreed with the amendment on the grounds...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1356
House
House of Lords

moved, as an amendment to the Motion, at end insert ““but do propose Amendments Nos. 160B and 160C in lieu of Lords Amendment No. 160””: 160B: Page 130, line 1, at beginning insert ““subject to subsection (2A),”” 160C: Page 130, line 2, at end insert— ““(2A) With the exception of...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1356-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the statement made by the noble Baroness the Leader of the House goes to the heart of the relationship that exists between the two Houses when we are dealing with what I would call the conversation between them when we are engaged in the consideration of Commons and...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1359-60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons reasons be considered forthwith. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to Bill 69, as first printed for the Commons.]

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1350
House
House of Lords

My Lords, throughout the passage of this Bill, I have listened very closely and consistently to arguments that have been made on all parts of it. It has been a long and complex Bill. Noble Lords have been very generous in the tributes that they have paid at previous stages...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1365-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not propose to discuss the planning issue, but I want to ask my noble friends on the Front Bench a simple question. Let us assume that after the next general election there may be some adjustment in the nature of government. Any Minister at that stage...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1364-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been listening very carefully to this debate. This is the second day running in which the privilege amendment has been raised by the House of Commons. That is rather worrying. I have a little experience of this because, when I was a Whip in another place,...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1364
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords, not only those who spoke in this short debate but also the many others who stayed to listen. I think that there is a widespread recognition that we are dealing here with something a great deal more significant even than Part 11 of...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1366-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is the duty of the Delegated Powers Committee to monitor all Bills which confer delegated powers on Ministers. When the committee, which I chair, monitored this Bill for the first time it became apparent that Part 11 gave rise to two serious problems. First, almost the entire...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1360-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Companion also states that the Commons regularly accepts Lords’ amendments which have financial implications. If we are to function as a bicameral parliament, as has been said, it is inevitable that it should do so because almost everything costs money. Your Lordships will understand the subtleties and...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1360
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am a Member of both the Delegated Powers Committee and the Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee which, as the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, said, is in session. However, its chairman, the noble Lord, Lord Filkin, has accepted my apologies and encouraged me to speak in this debate....

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1363-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad that my noble friend the Leader of the House emphasised that while it was not for us to challenge a Commons assertion of financial privilege, equally she did not wish us to be stifled in debate. That dual requirement leaves us in a bit of...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2008
Reference
705 c1361-3
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 24/11/2008 from Baroness Andrews to Lord Greaves regarding various issues arising from the Third Reading debate on the Planning Bill. 33 p.

Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
DEP2008-2868
House
House of Lords

The Minister is being characteristically generous in giving way again. Notwithstanding PPS3 guidance, does he not acknowledge that many councils, including Castle Point, have given away far too many gardens in the dash for flats? We are seeing massive flat developments being built without any garden space at all, but...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c529
House
House of Commons