Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,310 results for subject:"Codes of practice"

Legislation X
Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Parliamentary Standards Bill 2008-09 (1,310)
More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
21 July 2009
Reference
CHAP 13 2009

This new offence criminalises conduct that on its own is currently not an offence. It does not mean that, if there was evidence of dishonesty, the person against whom the claim was made would not be prosecuted under the Fraud Act. This is a new offence but, if dishonesty were...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1278
House
House of Lords

I certainly have some sympathy with the submission of the noble Lord, Lord Campbell of Alloway. After all, we are a reviewing Chamber, and we are reviewing one of the most important pieces of legislation ever to have come our way. Whether we like it or not, and whether or...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1275-6
House
House of Lords

I warmly welcome this amendment. I am sure that it improves the Bill as a whole. I want to add one thing. The Bill is extremely hurried, there is no question about that, but the Member of the House who is most inconvenienced and put to the most trouble by...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1283-4
House
House of Lords

Amendment 80B 80B: Clause 10, page 8, line 17, after "to" insert "the Committee on Standards in Public Life or to" Amendment 80B agreed. Clause 10, as amended, agreed. Clause 11 : Power to make transitional etc provision Amendment 81 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List. Amendment 81A not...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1321-2
House
House of Lords

I support the taking out of subsections (2) and (3), but I want to make one further point on subsection (1) and on the fact that there would be a maximum 12-month sentence. If the Minister is right and there is a distinction to be drawn between the offence created...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1284
House
House of Lords

I am not saying that it is symbolic and presentational at all. I said that we believe that the new offence is absolutely necessary. However, it is my profound hope that the activities of MPs and the way in which people conduct themselves will be so improved that in future...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1280
House
House of Lords

That has been the very crux of our arguments today. What I am suggesting is that I will go away and consider the possibility of guidance and what that guidance will say. I have undertaken to come back to noble Lords on that.

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1292
House
House of Lords

Listening to the speech of my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay of Clashfern, I thought that he demolished the Bill on an important legal point about changing the law. The noble Baroness the Leader of the House has not answered my noble and learned friend’s point at all. It...

Member
Lord Crickhowell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1292
House
House of Lords

I have not yet concluded what I was saying. I will come back to answer the points made by the noble and learned Lord, for whom I have the utmost respect. I have to agree with the point that was made earlier, because I am advised—I believe that I have...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1292
House
House of Lords

I should speak on this briefly because I am one of the Members who gave notice of their intention to oppose the Question that Clause 8 stand part. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, and the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy of The Shaws, have made interesting and important points....

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1290
House
House of Lords

I reinforce what my noble friend has just said, because that is my concern both about the Bill and this clause. The noble Baroness seems to think that the Bill is being introduced to meet public concern and that that is justification for it. It is not addressing public concern;...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1291
House
House of Lords

What the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, has said is very interesting. I have already spoken once on the clause stand part, but the way in which the debate has moved on has raised in me another thought. I agree completely that the Clause 8 that we now have is a...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1290-1
House
House of Lords

I have tried to be helpful to my noble friend throughout the Bill but I want to say something now which I hope does not worry her. I think that MPs will not understand the distinction on this issue of dishonesty. It is worrying me, the more I think about...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1291
House
House of Lords

On the last point of the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, one of the key purposes of the Bill is to address the demonstrable public concern of the past few months and to improve the confidence and trust of the public in our system of governance. However, it is...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1291
House
House of Lords

Is the guidance likely to draw the Member’s attention to the fact that, if a knowingly false claim is made, the Member would be liable to prosecution? Would that prosecution liability come under the Fraud Act or would it come under this Bill? If so, what is difference between the...

Member
Lord Eden of Winton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1292
House
House of Lords

Clarity is of the essence whenever offences are being discussed. A person must know whether or not what they are doing is against the law. Like the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, I do not think that standards have slipped so far that people do not know when they...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1291-2
House
House of Lords

I, too, would like to express concern about the message that is sent to the public. I greatly agree with my noble friend Lord Campbell-Savours that this is really about driving the message home to Members of Parliament, but I am afraid that the message to the public will be...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1289
House
House of Lords

There is an important distinction to be made between a perfectly dotty expenses system from which people can legally claim, albeit with a difference of morality, and doing things like—I am not quite sure if I am in order here—claiming interest on a mortgage that does not exist. Claiming interest...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1290
House
House of Lords

Amendment 77ZB 77ZB: Clause 8, page 6, line 42, leave out subsection (5) Amendment 77ZB agreed. Amendment 77A had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List. Debate on whether Clause 8, as amended, should stand part of the Bill.

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1288
House
House of Lords