Skip to main content

1-20 of 338 results for subject:Standards

Legislation X
Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12 (338)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is clear that the nub of this issue is the accountability required to make sure that the Social Fund is used in the manner for which it is intended. I doubt that any noble Lord does not see the significance of that and it has been argued...

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1069
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened to what has been said and there has been quite a lot of support for the amendment. Indeed, some of the figures are very alarming, including the amount that lack of provision costs the economy. My question concerns how much of what we are talking...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too add my support for this amendment, which was moved very powerfully by the noble Lord, Lord Adebowale. As other noble Lords have said, all we need is a little bit of joining up between some of the important work that has been taken forward by the...

Member
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1134
House
House of Lords

Welfare Reform Bill. Lords report stage sixth day. Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 124).

Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on bills
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1052-109, 1122-50
House
House of Lords

62ZC: Clause 103, page 73, line 28, at end insert— ““71ZJ Non-recoverable overpayments The Secretary of State may not recover any amount of any benefits paid in error by officials when the claimants could not reasonably be expected to know they where being overpaid.””””

Member
Baroness Hollins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1052
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the House will wish to know, in connection with this amendment, that I am an appointee for my disabled son's benefits. The amendment is designed to maintain the legislative position that prevents the state recovering overpayments where the mistake is entirely the fault of officials and where the...

Member
Baroness Hollins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1052-4
House
House of Lords

I support this amendment as someone who used to be responsible for delivering the benefits system. When I was in that position, I remember railing against the complexity of the system and am therefore delighted that we are doing something about that. I also railed against the complexity of some...

Member
Lord Bichard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1055
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it seems that the HMRC’s position on tax credits is to say, ““If we fail to meet our responsibilities but you meet all yours, we won’t ask you to pay back all of an overpayment caused by our failure””. That is quite a strong statement of their side...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1055-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have previously discussed, Clause 103 is based on the premise that for those benefits within its scope, most if not all overpayments will be recoverable. I think we are all in agreement that a benefit recipient should not receive any more money than they are due;...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1057-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister reminded the House that the current maximum weekly repayment for overpayments is some £10 a week. Will he assure the House that when a local decision-maker decides on the pattern of repayments that may be appropriate, one of the key factors to be taken into account...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1058-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think I can give that assurance on the basis that we are looking at financial hardship as the key criterion. Clearly the benefit recipient’s other debts form part of that consideration, so they will clearly be considered.

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1059
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister think it reasonable that no more than 10 per cent of total benefit income should go towards the repayment of any or all other debts.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure that I am in a position to give assurance on precise figures and percentages. I am giving a general assurance that that factor will be looked at as part of the financial hardship consideration.

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his detailed and careful reply, which contained a number of reassurances. Many of the reforms proposed in the Bill are primarily about changing behaviour rather than reducing expenditure. On the issue of overpayments, it is difficult to argue that the changes to the...

Member
Baroness Hollins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lord McKenzie, I also thank the Minister and the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, for that meeting. I know that he found it of considerable interest and use. The noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, of course knows rather a lot about penalties, sanctions and...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1060-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I need to start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, for arranging a really useful seminar the other week on a range of issues related to sanctions and penalties. I was equally impressed by the content of that seminar, the iron discipline with which it was conducted...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1061-2
House
House of Lords

62A: After Clause 113, insert the following new Clause— ““Guidelines to be followed by officials of jobcentres and local authorities when imposing sanctions, penalties or overpayments (1) The Secretary of State shall issue guidelines applying to claimants which must, when imposing sanctions or penalties, be followed by officials of jobcentres...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 62A is in many ways complementary to Amendment 62ZC, which we have just debated. The purpose of the amendment is to try to ensure that the standard of evidence required of officials in local authorities or jobcentres when imposing civil penalties and recovering overpayments should be the...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1060
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 129 enables relevant information to be shared between DWP, local authorities and others for prescribed purposes relating to the operation and administration of welfare services and social security benefits. As thinking has developed in relation to new data-sharing arrangements, it has become apparent that we may want...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1062-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just want one penn’orth. I completely support these amendments, but they give me the opportunity which I missed earlier in these proceedings to record on the Floor of the House that the single silliest thing in this whole affair is the determination of the Department for Communities...

Member
Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
734 c1063
House
House of Lords