1-2 of 2 results for subject:Science
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.142 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Science
- We searched for
- subject_t:Science OR subject_t:"Pure science" OR subject_ses:92917
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Consideration of Lords message. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords Amendment 49B, the Lords disagreement with the Commons in Commons Amendment 52 and Lords Amendments 52B and 52C, engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords Amendments 34B and 34C agreed to. Lords Amendments 32B and Lords Amendments 32C disagreed to on division (371 to 98). Lords Amendment 43B disgreed to on division (304 to 68). Lords Amendment 49B disagreed to on division (297 to 168). Lords Amendments 52B and 52C to Commons amendment 52 disagreed to on division (366 to 98). Lords Amendments 55D, 55E and 56B agreed to in lieu of Commons Amendment 55. Motion that a Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to their amendments. Agreed to on question. Reasons to be reported and communicated to the Lords.
Consideration of Lords message. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords Amendment 49B, the Lords disagreement with the Commons in Commons Amendment 52 and Lords Amendments 52B and 52C, engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords Amendments 34B and 34C agreed to. Lords Amendments 32B and Lords Amendments 32C disagreed to on division...
Clause 66 agreed to. Clause 67 agreed to as amended. Clauses 68 and 69 agreed to. Clause 70, discussed with amendments, new clause 5 (Parliamentary approval for changes to data safeguards), new clause 22 (Statement on changes to recognise legitimate interest), and schedule 4, agreed to. Schedules 4 and 5 agreed to. Clauses 71 to 79 agreed to. Clause 80, discussed with an amendment and new clause 23 (Definition of meaningful human involvement in automated decision-making), schedule 6, new clause 1 (Requirements of public sector organisations on use of algorithmic or automated decision-making systems), new clause 4 (Register of algorithmic tools used in public sector decision-making), new clause 7 (Information regarding high-risk AI decisions), new clause 24 (Register of algorithmic tools used in public sector decision-making), new clause 26 (Provision of explanations for high-risk AI decisions). Clause 80 agreed to. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clause 81, discussed with new clause 21 (Age of consent for social media data processing), agreed to. Clauses 82 to 88 agreed to. Schedules 7 to 9 agreed to. Clause 89, discussed with clause 90 stand part and new clause 8 (Intelligence services and law enforcement data-sharing: enhanced oversight), agreed to. Clauses 90 and 91 agreed to. Clause 92, discussed with new clause 27 (Secretary of State’s powers in relation to the Information Commission) and clause 93 stand part, agreed to. Clauses 93 and 94 agreed to. Clause 95, discussed with an amendment, Clauses 135 to 139 stand part, new clause 17 (Statement on application of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to activities by web-crawlers or artificial intelligence models), New clause 18 (Report on regulation of web-crawlers and artificial intelligence models on use of creative content), new clause 19 (Report on reducing barriers to market entry for start-ups and smaller AI enterprises on use of and access to data), and new clause 20 (Publication of a technological standard). Clause 95 agreed to as amended. Clause 96 to 116 agreed to. Schedules 10 to 13 agreed to. Committee adjourned
Clause 66 agreed to. Clause 67 agreed to as amended. Clauses 68 and 69 agreed to. Clause 70, discussed with amendments, new clause 5 (Parliamentary approval for changes to data safeguards), new clause 22 (Statement on changes to recognise legitimate interest), and schedule 4, agreed to. Schedules 4 and 5...