Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for house:"House of Lords"

Department X
Procedure and Privileges Committee
Subject X
Attendance

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Procedure and Privileges Committee (27)

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Attendance (27)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to agree the second report of the Procedure and Privileges Committee on Temporary exclusion; Statements on trade between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom; and Financial Services Regulation Committee (HL 64). Amendment to regret debated and withdrawn. Original motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble
Department
Senior Deputy Speaker (HL); Procedure and Privileges Committee
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 cc1036-1044
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall focus on the Procedure and Privileges Committee proposal on the new Standing Order on temporary exclusion, but should there be any questions on the other points covered in the report, I will of course address them in winding up.

The proposed new Standing Order on temporary exclusion...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 cc1036-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Attlee

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1037
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Senior Deputy Speaker for the skilful and clear way that he has explained his proposals. I am sure that the whole House is grateful to the House authorities for how they have developed the proposals, which, as the noble Lord explained, work in...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 cc1037-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am relieved that the committee did not follow the other place by excluding Members on the basis of allegations alone. That has led to palpable injustices—for example, Andrew Rosindell and his constituents; he was excluded for two years because of malicious allegations that nobody who knew him...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 cc1039-1040
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a former barrister, may I ask whether it is the committee’s understanding that the presumption of innocence is sacrosanct in our criminal justice proceedings but that in workplaces around the country that face the same issue it is a relevant consideration? There are workplaces up and down...

Member
Baroness Berridge (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1040
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have participated in this short but important consideration of these proposals, particularly the noble Earl, Lord Attlee, for the amendment. Dealing with that in more detail, the commission considered that the relevant offences set out in the Standing Order would be of significant...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 cc1040-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not a lawyer, but I have a couple of questions. I do not quite understand this, and I have read the Standing Orders and looked at the report. Our assumption seems to be that overseas countries have the same independent judiciaries as we have. But nobody...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1041
House
House of Lords

This is precisely why we have made the arrangement in the Standing Order for overseas jurisdictions, particularly because there may well be some countries that deem matters criminal that we do not. It is precisely why, in the statute and in the Code of Conduct, there is this consideration about...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1041
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will try to assist the Senior Deputy Speaker and highlight the issue. I certainly understand the problem when you are dealing with a charge in overseas jurisdictions. There are essentially two issues. One is dealt with expressly in the guidance, although in the actual Standing Order the...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1043
House
House of Lords

I think that is why we have the ability, within the powers of the sub-committee, to review the point the noble Lord has made. It is within the scope of what is intended, as is the ability for us to act quickly, because of the point I described—if it was...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1043
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I tabled this regret amendment, I was confident that the Senior Deputy Speaker would give me a satisfactory answer.

He went very well until he touched on my FCDO point, when, unfortunately, he seemed to think I was suggesting that the sub-committee would have to go to...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2024
Reference
836 c1043
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are three Motions in my name on the Order Paper today. Should the House agree to the first Motion, which is to agree the recommendations of the Procedure and Privileges Committee’s sixth report, the further two Motions are resolutions which give effect to the report’s recommendations.

Before we...

Member
Lord McFall of Alcluith (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc692-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think I owe your Lordships an apology, as I have caused some confusion by my decision not to move the amendment standing in my name on the Order Paper. I listened carefully to the noble Lord, Lord McFall—the Senior Deputy Speaker—and have had discussions with the Chief...

Member
Lord Trefgarne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 c1509
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Senior Deputy Speaker on the way in which he introduced the sixth report from the Procedure and Privileges Committee. Although I am listed as a member of the committee, I shall not attend my first meeting of it until next Tuesday, 2 March, so I...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc695-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner of Worcester, and I certainly associate myself with his comments on the ability we have now of being a virtual House. I appreciate being able to take part virtually, and the staff certainly need congratulating on getting...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc696-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am really grateful to my noble friend Lord McFall, the Senior Deputy Speaker, for arranging this debate today in a manner in which we can all participate—virtually, if we wish. I do hope that, given the announcement in the other place today, it will not be long...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc1512-698
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened carefully to the introduction from the noble Lord, Lord McFall, and his summary of the reasons of the Procedure and Privileges Committee, but I found them unsatisfactory. The committee’s recommended delay in reinstating these by-elections has gone on long enough. Whatever some noble Lords may think...

Member
Lord Northbrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc698-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to play my part in this debate and I admire the way that the Senior Deputy Speaker, the noble Lord, Lord McFall, introduced it in a cautious, concise and clear manner. It is a potentially quite divisive debate and there will be disagreements. I disagree...

Member
Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc699-700
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Senior Deputy Speaker for his introduction to the debate. I had hoped that he might lift the lid a little more on the arguments going on in the Procedure Committee, but he followed his report almost word for word. I hope that when he sums...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2021
Reference
810 cc700-1
House
House of Lords