Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Insurance

Department X
Second Reading Committee

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Second Reading Committee (20)

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords Second Reading Committee motion to consider the Bill. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Newby
Answering member
Lord Davidson of Glen Clova
Department
Treasury; Second Reading Committee
Type
Debates on bills; Second Reading Committee proceedings
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc621-630GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Bill updates some important elements of insurance law. The existing legislation is outdated and does not reflect the commercial expectations of businesses purchasing insurance. That leads to disputes between insurers and policyholders, causing delay, expense and uncertainty. This undermines the reputation of one of the UK’s leading...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc621-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not intend to detain the Committee very long, but I just want to say how pleased I am that we have before us today this modest little Bill. I hope that we will find, as we get into the detail, that it is largely uncontroversial, simplifying...

Member
Lord Carrington of Fulham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc623-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the outset I make the point that I very much support the provisions in the Bill, which has been welcomed by all sides of the insurance industry, including insurers, insurance brokers and their trade associations. The Bill is also supported by the Chartered Insurance Institute. I commend...

Member
Lord Sheikh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc624-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister is to be commended for bringing this Bill before the House and agreeing the procedure for Law Commission Bills. A Bill modernising important elements of the UK’s insurance law is perhaps not likely to achieve public acclaim, but it genuinely contributes to strengthening the UK’s global...

Member
Lord Davidson of Glen Clova (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc626-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. I think that they all stressed the importance of greater clarity in the areas covered by the Bill, and indeed they felt that the Bill achieves that clarity. Certainly, as a non-expert, I was able to get...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc628-630GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not believe that the range of risk will be any greater. Under this Bill, the range of risk to which the insurers are exposed will be brought in line with the current industry best practice and the standards to which insurers are held under FSA rules...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c102GC
House
House of Lords

I should perhaps explain the point about cost. Given that the catch-all clause from the Marine Insurance Act 1906 is removed, necessarily the range of risks to which the insurance company is exposed will be greater. Given that, it is likely that the premium charge will be greater. That was...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c102GC
House
House of Lords

Good. I, too, am grateful that we have nailed that one. On the other questions raised by the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, there is first this difficult issue about permissible questions and specifically questions of gender and race. They are made particularly difficult by the recent judgment of the court...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c101-2GC
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the noble Lord. The trouble on these occasions is that the Hansard reporters tend to remove the relevant documents. I am most grateful for his clarification.

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c101GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for that, because some of this has been a touch technical and some rather fundamental. I will talk about the process in a moment, as my noble friend Lord Higgins asked about the procedure for Law Commission Bills. The fact that it is a Law Commission Bill...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c99-101GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start my response to what has been a helpful discussion by thanking the noble Lords who have taken the trouble to contribute this afternoon. The points have been wide-ranging and constructive. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, for his faith that I can respond...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c99GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely understand the noble Lord’s position and am quite happy to receive written answers to my questions.

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c99GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by raising one or two questions of a procedural nature. I am not clear whether I am speaking in the gap. My understanding is that there is virtually no precedent for the procedure that we have adopted today other than for one previous Law Commission Bill....

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c95-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I express my gratitude to the Minister and his team and to Mr David Hertzell of the Law Commission for their briefing on the Bill, which was very helpful indeed. In debates on measures brought before Parliament, the claim is often made—and perhaps even sometimes believed—that the consequences...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c96-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to have an opportunity to speak in what I assume is the Second Reading of this Bill and to congratulate the Government on a piece of legislation that has long been needed. I became aware of the issues that this Bill attempts to redress when...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c92-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall try to be brief in my contribution to this Second Reading debate. Until late last week, I had not intended to take part in the debate so I did not attend the briefing meeting that I understand my noble friend the Minister arranged. I also apologise...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c93-5GC
House
House of Lords

That the Committee do consider the Bill.

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c89GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Bill implements the recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission in their 2009 joint report on the law governing pre-contract disclosure and misrepresentation in consumer insurance contracts. This report highlighted an area where a complex and confusing array of rules and regulation has emerged...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c89-92GC
House
House of Lords

Lords Second Reading Committee motion to consider the Bill. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sassoon
Answering member
Baroness Noakes; Lord Eatwell
Department
Treasury; Second Reading Committee
Type
Debates on bills; Second Reading Committee proceedings
Date
13 June 2011
Reference
728 c89-102GC
House
House of Lords