Skip to main content

1-20 of 323 results for subject:Scotland

Department X
Government Equalities Office

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Government Equalities Office (323)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, if she will make an assessment of the potential (a) implications for her policies of the effectiveness of the free period products scheme in Scotland and (b) merits of implementing a similar scheme in England.

Asked by
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
8466
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what the cost was to the public purse of (a) polling and (b) focus groups on public attitudes towards the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill.

Asked by
David Linden (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 February 2023
Reference
132491
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what assessment she has made of the implications for her policies of the recommendations made by the Ending Conversion Practices Expert Advisory Group in Scotland on 4 October 2022.

Asked by
Lloyd Russell-Moyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2022
Reference
74839
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what assessment she has made with Cabinet colleagues of the potential merits of implementing the recommendations of the Expert Advisory Group to the Scottish Government on Ending Conversion Practices in England.

Asked by
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2022
Reference
78906
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Caroline Dinenage
Answering member
Sarah Champion
Department
Government Equalities Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
25 January 2017
House
House of Commons

Equality Bill. Lords report stage. Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL BIll 39).

Department
Government Equalities Office
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
In the second division Lord Rea should have been recorded as voting Not-content.
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1326-409, 1414-42
House
House of Lords

28: After Schedule 7, insert the following new Schedule— "SCHEDULE Work: seafarers Application of Part 5 1 (1) Part 5 of this Act applies to a seafarer who works wholly or partly within Great Britain (including United Kingdom waters adjacent to Great Britain) if— (a) the seafarer is on a...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1378-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, discrimination against foreign national seafarers is permitted under the Race Relations Act 1976—I think in Sections 8 and 9. Seafarers have to reside and be recruited abroad for the current exemption to apply. They are recruited abroad on local rates of pay to work on UK-registered vessels. Seafarers...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1379-81
House
House of Lords

My Lords, having heard the response of the noble Baroness the Leader of the House and the indication from the Conservative Front Bench that they would be minded to oppose, I do not want, in the interests of making progress, to cause a Division on this matter in order to...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1378
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has expressed the position of the UK Chamber of Shipping, but has he also had conferences or discussions with the trade unions concerned?

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1382
House
House of Lords

Unfortunately not, my Lords. I would have liked to have had the opportunity, but the amendment arose at short notice, so I am not as well briefed as I would like to have been. Because any such requirement is not enforceable against non-UK ships, the amendment would have the explicit...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1382-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, many years ago I had the privilege of dealing with aviation and shipping. I welcome the stance taken by my noble friend Lord Rosser today. We have many interests in common. My noble friend may well succeed me as president of the British Airline Pilots Association, a post...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1381-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, for explaining the purpose of his important amendment. However, I thought that he would propose his new schedule and other amendments to primary legislation merely as a probing amendment. I thought that the noble Lord was too experienced to...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1382
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government would be unwise to accept these amendments. After all, this Government brought in the tonnage tax in 2000, thanks to the former Deputy Prime Minister, since when the British-flagged fleet has increased by a factor of six, bringing substantial amounts to the Treasury. Indeed, in the...

Member
Lord Greenway (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1383
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord agree with my assertion that, whatever may be included—

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1383
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I accept what the noble Lord says and I will look into this again. However, there are still Catholic adoption agencies and they continue to provide an excellent service to those couples who wish to adopt through a faith-based agency. The right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Bradford...

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1369-70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords very much for their support—it seemed that I had the support of 95 per cent of the House for what I had to say. I strongly support gay rights—I have said so on numerous occasions—and I am a great supporter of Stonewall. However, I...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1370-1
House
House of Lords

22: Schedule 3, page 148, line 15, at end insert— "(3) Sub-paragraph (4) applies to a person (A) who may, in a case that comes within the Marriage Act 1949 (other than the case mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)), solemnise marriages according to a form, rite or ceremony of a body...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1371
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Committee, amendments were put forward by the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Winchester and the noble Baroness, Lady Gould of Potternewton, regarding gender reassignment and marriage. These were accepted by the Government, as they made it clear that the Equality Bill would preserve the current position...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1371-2
House
House of Lords

We understand from the letter of the Minister that the amendments are further drafting corrections and clarifications. We welcome the changes. Amendment 22 agreed. Amendment 23 Moved by

Member
Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
717 c1372
House
House of Lords