Skip to main content

1-20 of 458 results for subject:Scotland

Department X
Committee of the Whole House (HL)

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (458)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I qualified that by saying, ““on important matters of constitutional reform””, and I then went on to explain what the Constitution Committee said when they used the term ““fundamental””. I stand by that. What I am saying is that, if you extend the number of referendums that you have well...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c185
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I was first elected to the other place, I was a very staunch believer in parliamentary democracy, full stop, and did not like the idea of introducing the referendum into our system. But the fact is that we have done so, and on a number of constitutional...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c186-8
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Rennard, makes an excellent point. However, I am optimistic because we are about to resume proper scrutiny in your Lordships’ House.

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c160
House
House of Lords

I wonder if I may be permitted to make a general point, briefly, as we move into Committee, before I come to the specific matter of Amendment 1. I tabled this and other amendments after I had seen last Thursday that only eight amendments had been tabled to this Bill...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c159-60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, I say that the noble Lord did perhaps invite us to slumber on a number of occasions in the course of that Bill. However, having studied the recent precedence of filibustering in the French Assembly, he must have been unaware of those precedents at the time...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c160
House
House of Lords

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out subsection (2) and insert— ““( ) The polling days for the next parliamentary general election after the passing of this Act will be the weekend of 8 to 10 May 2015.””

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c159
House
House of Lords

Doolally was the word. It is a splendid parliamentary term and I would not disagree with it. There were many contributions to this debate but the only one with which I strongly disagreed was that of the noble Lord, Lord Marks, as he will not be surprised to hear. From...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c197
House
House of Lords

The Minister is very careful in his choice of words. Can he assist me? What should I say in the referendum campaign to people who ask me whether there will be the same AV system for voting for Members of the House of Lords? If it is not to be...

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c194
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Cormack and the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, for tabling the amendments and giving me an opportunity to update the Committee further to what I said on the Second Reading. My noble friend Lord Cormack asked the Government to think carefully about this...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c201-3
House
House of Lords

He has actually put it to Parliament for it to support. Parliament will have had to vote that through, as is quite clear because we have other amendments coming down to change that date. Unless circumstances arise that would trigger the mechanisms in Clause 2, the Prime Minister of the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c191-2
House
House of Lords

He has chosen it.

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c191
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have once again had a spirited and interesting debate with a number of important points made. It is also obvious that some of the issues raised went beyond the question of a referendum and into some of the detail of the different constitutional reforms that have either...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c191
House
House of Lords

It is because it is part of a series of measures of constitutional change. The noble Lord, Lord Tyler, will also know that the intention was always to produce that White Paper, which we did, then to ensure that it was in the manifestos of the three parties at the...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c191
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not accept that. It is not the abolition of a House to change its composition, however attractively the point might be put. I remind your Lordships’ House that we had a very significant constitutional reform with the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, whereby the highest court in...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c183-4
House
House of Lords

I am extremely grateful to the noble Lord, but when he read out the list of issues which could be subject to a referendum he mentioned the abolition of the monarchy and the abolition of either House. Does he not accept that, if your Lordships’ House is replaced by a...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c183
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness is perhaps addressing a debate that we are yet to have on another occasion. It is well known that in the past we have favoured, and indeed do favour, other electoral systems. It is also well known that the coalition agreement commits us to a...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c183
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness is absolutely right to draw attention to the fact that the Constitution Committee thought that pre-legislative scrutiny would have been a good idea. Nevertheless, the committee heard evidence over a number of days and read a great deal of written evidence from some of the...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c184-5
House
House of Lords

My recollection is that the Constitution Committee took the view that there should have been pre-legislative scrutiny, which would have led to many of these points being discussed properly, particularly the role and relationship proposed in this Bill between the Prime Minister and the Speaker in another place.

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c184
House
House of Lords

It is nowhere near as high a threshold as has been put in this Bill for a dissolution of Parliament.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c185
House
House of Lords

My Lords, 66 per cent of the House of Commons voting on an occasion when we may expect a turnout of well over 99 per cent is not, in my respectful submission, a very high threshold. The thresholds are different in kind, and my noble friend Lord Cormack knows that...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c185
House
House of Lords