Skip to main content

1-20 of 202 results for subject:Standards

Department X
Department for Education and Skills
Subject X
Care homes

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Department for Education and Skills (202)
More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Care homes (202)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Department for Education and Skills
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 January 2007
Reference
HINF 2007/340
House
House of Commons

I support the amendments in this group, particularly the probing Amendments Nos. 33 and 35, and I shall refer also to Amendment No. 28. The noble Baroness, Lady Buscombe, was concerned over the grouping and not being sure about whether to jump up. So, I have seized this opportunity of...

Member
Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c756
House
House of Lords

I, too, support Amendments Nos. 33 and 35, because they are essential safeguards if we are to go ahead with the Bill as it is roughly constituted. There may, however, be a better way, suggested in the other amendments in this group, by giving to the governing body responsibility for...

Member
Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c758
House
House of Lords

This group of amendments is about aspects of the appointment of school improvement partners. I shall speak first to Amendments Nos. 28, 29, 31, 34, 39 and 41. The noble Lord, Lord Lucas, asked about Amendment No. 36. I understand that that was debated last week. Local authorities have responsibility...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c758-9
House
House of Lords

I have tabled Amendments Nos. 35 and 42 in this group, which I shall discuss together. The first concerns the incompatibility issue, to which reference has been made already. The proposal is that if, after two years, it is clear that the relationship is not working, the governing body should...

Member
Lord Dearing (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c756-7
House
House of Lords

These Benches have great sympathy with the two amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Dearing. The issues being discussed are the degree to which a SIP should be compulsory and the degree to which a school should choose its own SIP. We have much sympathy with both issues. The...

Member
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c757-8
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the Minister can clarify something that she has just said. Is the money for all this extra work going to the school rather than the person? That sounds like what she meant.

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c761
House
House of Lords

In the case of a current head, the extra money would go to the school. Perhaps it will be clearer if I make a few more comments on funding. Establishing the SIP function is an important change for a local authority, and the Government are providing them with funding to...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c761
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister honestly believe that that kind of under-achievement will be sorted out in an average of five days a year?

Member
Baroness Buscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c759
House
House of Lords

As training and professional development allow for high standards of peer review for SIPs, if a school needs assistance in a particular area, I believe that it will be better off with five days a year than without it. A decline in progress among 11 to 14 year-olds is another...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c759-60
House
House of Lords

I shall reply to the question of the noble Baroness, Lady Sharp, to begin with. Where a former head teacher is a SIP, there will be very little difference in the quality of the experience, advice, support and challenge that will be given. The vast majority of the SIPs operating...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c749-50
House
House of Lords

How much will these people be paid? The amount of money being put aside indicates that it is about £1,000 per school. If the rate is £1,000 for 19 days, that does not seem like very much money for highly trained professionals.

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c750
House
House of Lords

I am very happy to write to the noble Baroness about the details of pay. The payment systems will be different for different SIPs. It depends whether you are a current head teacher and this is additional to your responsibilities, or a retired head teacher who is a consultant and...

Member
Baroness Crawley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c750
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister deals with conflict, I asked whether not only maintained schools would be required to have SIPs but trust schools and academies, as set out in my noble friend’s amendment, and, if so, who would appoint them and whether they would require the Secretary of State’s approval.

Member
Baroness Williams of Crosby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c750
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for responding at length to all our questions. I am also grateful to those who participated in the debate. We are all clearer about the whole purpose of SIPs and how they will be appointed. The Minister said that the Government wished to change...

Member
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c751
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 28: Page 3, line 22, leave out from beginning to first ““a”” in line 23 and insert ““The governing body of a maintained school must appoint”” The noble Baroness said: I wish to speak to Amendments Nos. 28, 30, 32, 34 and 43 and to Amendment No....

Member
Baroness Buscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c751-5
House
House of Lords

I have a number of amendments in this group, and by and large they support what my noble friend has just said. I shall start off with a request and a question. My request is whether I may have an answer to the question that I asked in the last...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c755
House
House of Lords

It is published.

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c755
House
House of Lords

I rise to speak to Amendments Nos. 24, 26 and 26A standing in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Sharp. Amendment No. 24 would do something similar to Amendment No. 23 moved by the noble Lord, Lord Judd. It would require the local authority to be the...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c724-7
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 23: Page 3, leave out line 8. The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. 23, I shall speak also to Amendment No. 25. There is a great burden of business before the Committee today and therefore I shall endeavour to be as brief as possible. We...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
684 c723-4
House
House of Lords