Skip to main content

1-20 of 103 results for subject:Charities

Department X
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Subject X
Sunset clauses

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Sunset clauses (103)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My hon. Friend raises a very important point. In fact, progress is being made and public sector landlords of houses in multiple occupation are paying attention to the issue. We estimate that about 60 per cent. of the houses in multiple occupation are in the public sector, with a smaller...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State mentioned the conversion to North sea gas and I am old enough to remember it, but the difference is that that was a free service. I know that digital now has about 70 per cent. penetration into people’s homes, but the vast majority have both digital...

Member
Eric Martlew (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178
House
House of Commons

Half the channels is absolutely right, but part of the success of freeview has been precisely because there are people out in the country who would love to have 30 channels but do not necessarily want 500 channels. That is part of the reason for freeview’s great success. It has...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178
House
House of Commons

Half the channels.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178
House
House of Commons

I do not accept my hon. Friend’s concern that it will be a second-rate service in any sense and I am not entirely sure exactly what he means by it, except—

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178
House
House of Commons

I have to confess to a sneaking admiration for the Secretary of State. She certainly does not shirk a challenge. Not content with overseeing the Olympics, she has now taken on digital switchover. The projects have similarities. They are both due to be completed by 2012; they are both huge...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1183-4
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman will contain his soul in patience for a few minutes, I will set out the costs for him. The help scheme is designed to be platform-neutral so that all households will be entitled to a choice of options for getting their digital TV services. That takes...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1181-3
House
House of Commons

In which case, I could keep going until 10 o’clock, but I might lose the House if I proceed on that basis. Let me return to the ““digital tick”” logo—a subject that relates to a number of points that hon. Members were making about Christmas shopping. The logo is a...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1179-80
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State makes an important case: there are those who will need that support. Given the complexity of modern homes, there is surely a question about whether support for one conversion is sufficient to assist people to change all the different bits of equipment in their household. More...

Member
Michael Moore (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1180
House
House of Commons

No, there will not be any retrospective provision, because the help scheme is intended to enable people who are not switching of their own volition and choice—for whatever reason, but by and large because they are elderly and do not find the prospect of digital television particularly appealing. It is...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1180-1
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give way?

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1181
House
House of Commons

This is the last one.

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1181
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to the Secretary of State. She says that she has to balance the need to provide assistance to the people who require it with keeping down the cost to the licence fee payer. Can she say how much the targeted assistance scheme will cost?

Member
John Whittingdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1181
House
House of Commons

The principle of universal access drives this whole policy and, by and large, that also creates for the majority of people in this country a choice of platform. They can choose whether they want freeview, satellite or cable. However, people who live in remote areas or areas where the terrain...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1179
House
House of Commons

I do not accept the hon. Lady’s conclusion. She will know that Ofcom will publish tomorrow the first stage of its digital dividend review and it will seek to answer some of these complex questions. Those questions also fit with decisions that will be taken about the disposal of spectrum...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178-9
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State is making a very important point, but she has appeared to elide the issue of high-definition television. If terrestrial television is to be made available in high definition, some bandwidth will have to be made available to the BBC and existing terrestrial television networks. Does she...

Member
Julie Kirkbride (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1178
House
House of Commons

I do not doubt the good intentions behind the legislation—in particular universal access—but I am sure that I am not the only MP who has been contacted by constituents about this subject. A pensioner household asked me to put the following points to the Secretary of State. Some households have...

Member
David Leslie Taylor (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1173
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention. He and I are as one in being concerned that there must be proper protection of the people—according to some estimates there will be 6 million to 7 million of them—who will be the beneficiaries of the provisions. If the Bill continues...

Member
Baroness Jowell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1173
House
House of Commons

As one side of the argument has been presented so early in the debate, I rise to ask the Secretary of State whether she also recognises that great damage would be caused to some individuals if they were to be missed out due to a lack of data sharing? Caring...

Member
Alun Michael (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1173
House
House of Commons

Good one!

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2006
Reference
454 c1175
House
House of Commons