Skip to main content

1-20 of 23 results for subject:Enforcement

Department X
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Session X
2008-09

Type

House

Session

2008-09 (23)

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I very much welcome the opportunity to put this question this afternoon. I am delighted that my noble friends Lord Attlee and Lord Eccles are taking part. The way in which government consultations are conducted may seem a technical issue but it is actually important to the health of our...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c495-8GC
House
House of Lords

Noble Earl. The Room is full of Viscounts and Earls, as my predecessor in the previous debate said. It is important that we take account of all consultations and of everyone who has written in. I have no idea what happened in the noble Earl’s case and I shall respond...

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c508GC
House
House of Lords

I do not have time to consult, so I shall reply in writing. In any consultation it is important—there have been a couple of questions on this—to reflect on the weight of the evidence. Should we list all the individuals? It is not possible to provide departments with guidance on...

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c507GC
House
House of Lords

I join other noble Lords in thanking my noble friend Lord Norton of Louth for drawing our attention to this important area of the legislative process. Consultation is vital to public confidence in our legislative system; indeed, it is a word that we hear often in your Lordships’ House. We...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c502-4GC
House
House of Lords

I also wish to express my grateful appreciation to the noble Lord, Lord Norton, for introducing this important debate. However, I also extend my appreciation to the work that he has done prior to this debate to seek to elicit the facts. For he has, through most persistent questioning, raised...

Member
Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c501-2GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to my noble friend Lord Norton for introducing this debate. I come at it as a member of the Merits Committee and therefore as a recipient of the outcome of a great many consultations. We regularly look at 30 instruments a week, and one of the...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c498-500GC
House
House of Lords

Earl.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c508GC
House
House of Lords

If the simple question is whether we would list every name, the answer is no: we would not. Clearly, all the evidence that we receive has to be considered and analysed and it has to be put forward as part of the consultation. As I said, we do not list...

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c508GC
House
House of Lords

Mine was a very simple question. I hope that the Minister will find time to answer it.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c507GC
House
House of Lords

I will look at this particular case and write to the noble Viscount.

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c508GC
House
House of Lords

I was talking about the specific circumstances where an MP wrote directly to me—"Dear John, I have been tasked by the Prime Minister to look into this matter"—and the circumstances were exactly as I have described. Should I or should I not have been on the list of consultees?

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c508GC
House
House of Lords

This has been an excellent debate, which has been greatly enriched by the knowledge and expertise that your Lordships have in this area. In preparation, I read the bio of the noble Lord, Lord Norton; I was obviously aware that he was a subject matter expert. I apologise that I...

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c504-6GC
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what plans they have to ensure that public consultations by government departments follow best practice.

Lead member
Lord Norton of Louth
Answering member
Lord Davies of Abersoch
Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c495-508GC
House
House of Lords

The department to which he referred, Defra, was one of those with the least good record of compliance. There were no fewer than 13 cases out of a total of 81 in which they did not allow the minimum amount of time of 12 weeks. In one case it allowed...

Member
Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c506-7GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure that public consultations by government departments follow best practice.

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c495GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, am grateful to my noble friend Lord Norton for introducing this Question for Short Debate. I do not often get involved in these issues, but I have a simple question for the Minister. The advantage of Grand Committee is that the Minister has ready access to his officials,...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2009
Reference
710 c500GC
House
House of Lords

SI 2009/670. Together with an explanatory memorandum and impact assessment from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Coming into force 6 April 2009.

Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 March 2009
Reference
SI 2009/670
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 2009/665. Together with an explanatory memorandum and impact assessment from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Coming into force 6 April 2009.

Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 March 2009
Reference
SI 2009/665
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 2009/669. Together with an explanatory memorandum and impact assessment from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Coming into force 6 April 2009.

Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
16 March 2009
Reference
SI 2009/669
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 2009/581. Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Coming into force 6 April 2009.

Department
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
SI 2009/581
House
House of Commons; House of Lords