Skip to main content

1-20 of 179 results for subject:Charities

Department X
Home Office
Subject X
Property transfer

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Property transfer (179)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Charities Bill (HL). Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Bill passed with amendments and sent to the Commons. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Bassam of Brighton
Answering member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c558-79
House
House of Lords

Charities Bill (HL). Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Bill passed with amendments and sent to the Commons. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Bassam of Brighton
Answering member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c582-608
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for his response. I put to him that we are just fudging the issue. One day a Labour government will have to sort it out. I am grateful to other Members of the House. I am under no illusions that my...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c566-7
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1:"Page 3, line 27, at end insert—" ““(   )   In determining whether an independent school meets the public benefit test under this section, the Charity Commission shall have regard to any directions or guidance issued by the Secretary of State.”” The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. 1, I shall...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c559
House
House of Lords

Hear, hear!

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c566
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first thank the noble Lord, Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market, for his kind comments about us all. Rather like the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, I was thinking, ““Well, yes, perhaps the noble Lord would say that, wouldn’t he?””. The generosity of his view is well meant, and we have...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c564-6
House
House of Lords

And, my Lords, I am sure that, to my noble friend’s credit, he will ensure that there is. I cannot accept his amendments. They are inconsistent with our policy approach to the Bill and, for the reasons that I have set out, they would seriously compromise the independence of the...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c566
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can see from what the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, has said that I shall have to expand a little on my explanation of the difficulties to which his amendment might give rise for charitable amateur sports clubs wanting to convert to CASC status. There is no doubt that...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c567-8
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2:"Page 4, line 24, at end insert ““unless and until it registers as such, in which event it shall cease automatically to be a registered sports club””" The noble Lord said: My Lords, I hope that I can move this amendment speedily. This is the same amendment as...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c567
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord but he will be interested to know that when I visited the Charity Commission this morning, it had in its reception area free postcards. On them, in very large print, was the word ““Fair””, so perhaps the noble Lord’s amendment...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c572
House
House of Lords

My Lords, presumably, it does not have the word ““reasonably”” on another postcard. That is very good. For the benefit of those who have not heard the Government’s position before, I will place it on the record. We completely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Swinfen, that the commission should act...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c572-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister says that the first part of the amendment is unnecessary. It may be. It should be. He makes me think, however, of the situation in a mine where the managers put safety precautions in place, but the people at the coalface do not follow them because...

Member
Lord Swinfen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c573-4
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 6:"After Clause 8, insert the following new clause—"““CHAPTER 2A THE CHARITY INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS REVIEWER    After section 2 of the 1993 Act insert— 2A   THE CHARITY INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS REVIEWER (1)   There shall be a complaints reviewer to be known as the Charity Independent Complaints Reviewer (in this Act referred to as ““the Reviewer””)....

Member
Lord Swinfen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c574-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I can reassure the noble Lord. I am rather surprised that he has raised the issue in the way in which he has. What we have tried to do—unusually with this piece of legislation—is be more flexible, imaginative and focused. It should work where it...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c569-70
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4:"Page 7, line 31, at end insert—" ““7.      In performing its regulatory functions the Commission must act fairly and reasonably, and with regard to the interests of charity beneficiaries and other people who are stakeholders in charities.”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I start by thanking the Minister...

Member
Lord Swinfen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c570-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord has addressed this issue at length on previous occasions with different amendments, but this amendment seeks to bring together two separate amendments that he tabled previously. The first part concerns a duty for the commission in performing its regulatory functions to act ““fairly and reasonably””,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c571-2
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 3:"Page 7, line 26, after ““must”” insert ““, in appropriate cases,””" The noble Lord said: My Lords, this should not detain the House for too long. It is an amendment standing in the name of my noble friend Lady Scotland. On Report, on 12 October, your Lordships’ House agreed...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c568-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the Minister’s response. I think this is a classic example of where we have not done very well because we should have had a discussion on this outside this Chamber. Everything the Minister said is wrong, and I must leave it at that—this is...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c568
House
House of Lords

My Lords, by contrast, I am delighted with the amendment and grateful to the Government. I would like to reassure the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, that actually this prevents what he fears—that is to say the one-size-fits-all approach. There are classes of charity that are not about innovation at all, for...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c569
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand what the Minister is driving at here and I do not want to strike a sour note at this hour. I am concerned about how one decides what are ““appropriate cases””. My original objective in pressing for the inclusion of the desirability of facilitating innovation was...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2005
Reference
675 c569
House
House of Lords