Skip to main content

1-20 of 557 results for subject:Evidence

Department X
Cabinet Office

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Cabinet Office (557)
More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Information Rights decision of 23 July 2026, NCN: [2026] UKFTT 01080 (GRC), Case Reference: FT/EA/2025/0456, Greenwood and Information Commissioner and Cabinet Office, if she will place in the Library a copy of the...

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
28 August 2026
Reference
20832
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether disclosures to the Southport Inquiry by (1) the Department of Health and Social Care, (2) NHS England, and (3) Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, concerning "inappropriate accesses" to victim records satisfied the current text of the Public Office...

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 June 2026
Reference
HL558
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Cabinet Secretary’s review into Peter Mandelson will take evidence from officials who were involved in the due diligence and vetting processes, including (a) the propriety and ethics team, (b) UK Security Vetting, (c) the FCDO and (d) the Prime Minister’s...

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
111705
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Infected Blood Compensation Authority will accept a range of evidence for assessing injuries suffered by deceased victims - including medical, social care, police, employment and family records, and partial or fragmentary documentation - in light of findings by the Infected...

Asked by
Andrew George (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
111087
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he will take steps to prevent organisations with which the Government has a policy of non-engagement from submitting written evidence to (a) ministers, (b) officials and (c) public consultations.

Asked by
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
105789
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the three witness statements in relation to the alleged breach of the Official Secrets Act on behalf of China.

Lead member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 cc883-486
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the Minister answer whether the 1 September meeting, as reported by the Sunday Times, between senior officials and intelligence chiefs in the Cabinet Office, and reportedly chaired by the National Security Adviser, Jonathan Powell, discussed the China espionage case and what evidence should be provided to the...

Member
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c483
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her question. It is our third such outing on matters pertaining—well, our second, but the third in a week. To confirm, the meeting on 1 September was a discussion with the National Security Adviser about the management of the court case as it continued....

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c484
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this case seems to boil down to the binary political question: conspiracy or cock-up? The Government vehemently deny conspiracy, so they must believe it is a cock-up. But where and how did this happen, and how will the Government find out this fact? A Joint Select Committee plans...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c484
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises a very important point. Our Parliament is at its best when it scrutinises the Government, and I am very pleased that the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy is now undertaking its inquiry. The Intelligence and Security Committee, led by my noble friend Lord Beamish,...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c484
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister agree that the DPP simply got the law wrong in deciding to drop the case? In particular, does she agree that he failed to appreciate that whether China represents a current threat to our national security is a question of fact for the jury, and that he...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c484
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his question and his continued interest in these matters. Although the Government share the disappointment that the prosecution could not continue, the DPP’s decision is independent of the Government. Any decision to draw on the Shivpuri case as part of legal proceedings in this...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c484
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister clarify for the record that anyone invited to appear before any of these committees, including the DPP, the National Security Adviser and, if necessary, the Prime Minister himself, will attend?

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c485
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is aware that I cannot speak on behalf of the DPP, and while I wish I was in charge of the Prime Minister’s diary, no one has given me that responsibility. However, to be very clear, we expect full co-operation and that everybody invited to attend will...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c485
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister explain why no fewer than three witness statements were required from the Government? Are we to conclude that the Government did not make their position sufficiently clear in the first two statements?

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c485
House
House of Lords

I think it would be helpful if we went through the timescale of what happened with this case. The alleged incidents occurred. The Government—who at that point were the previous Government—met, and they instructed the Deputy National Security Adviser to provide a witness statement. At that point, and as soon...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c485
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a member of the Joint Committee. Given that detailed personal information about parliamentarians and others, including human rights activists, has, according to media reports over the weekend, been handed over to a top Chinese official described as very close indeed to President Xi...

Member
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c485
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness makes the most important of points. One of the things that has been missing from conversations, including our own debate over the past week, is that people who some of us know extremely well have been targeted by a foreign state. Their lives, political careers and families...

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c486
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that the charges were brought under the Official Secrets Act, which dates from the beginning of the 20th century, which is one of the reasons it was changed? Unfortunately, the charges were brought when it was still running and in existence. Certainly in the...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c486
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness invites me to question the independence of the CPS, and I am unlikely to do so.

Member
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2025
Reference
849 c486
House
House of Lords