Skip to main content

1-20 of 159 results for subject:Liability

Department X
Cabinet Office
Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More
Cabinet Office (159)

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is normal practice, when a government department proposes to undertake a contingent liability in excess of £300,000 for which there is no specific statutory authority, for the Department concerned to present to Parliament a Minute giving particulars of the liability created and explaining the circumstances; and to refrain from...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Written statements
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
HCWS1525
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

It is normal practice, when a government department proposes to undertake a contingent liability in excess of £300,000 for which there is no specific statutory authority,...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Written statements
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
HLWS1487
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Mr David Lidington
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Unprinted command papers
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
2017-19
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Mr David Lidington
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Unprinted command papers
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
2017-19
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Chloe Smith
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Command papers
Date
7 March 2018
Reference
Cm. 9578
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Young of Cookham on 15 January (HL Deb, col 471), whether the joint and several liability that applies to all parties to the six joint venture contracts they let to groups in which Carillion was a shareholder will transition all...

Asked by
Lord Myners (Crossbench)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
HL5032
House
House of Lords

With permission, Mr Speaker, I wish to make a statement to update the House on the situation relating to Carillion Plc.

Today the directors of Carillion concluded that the company is insolvent and that it is going into liquidation. The court has appointed the official receiver as the liquidator. It is...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc624-6
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for an advance copy of the statement. The House will conclude that it was recklessly complacent for the Government to seek to avoid responsibility and to place it on to the company. After all, Carillion provides 450 separate taxpayer-funded contracts to the public, with 20,000 people...

Member
Jon Trickett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc626-7
House
House of Commons

First, may I correct the hon. Gentleman on one specific point about schools? He said that 9,000 schools have contracts with Carillion, but the figure I have is about 230—219 plus a small number of building contracts—which is much smaller than the exaggerated figure that he gave the House.

As I...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc627-8
House
House of Commons

First, let me pay tribute to my right hon. Friend’s calm and workmanlike approach in working through all the contracts and liabilities, which is absolutely the responsible thing to do. I note what he says about the financial capabilities, awarding and the public procurement rules, and I am sure there...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c628
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for that. Let me make two points in response to her. First, the Government, through the official receiver, are continuing to make provision for payments both to suppliers and subcontractors. If any subcontractor experiences any difficulties, I encourage them to talk in...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c628
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for advance sight of his statement. Obviously, our immediate thoughts are with the workers involved and their families—those affected by this announcement directly and the many thousands more who are indirectly affected. I am aware that the Scottish Government are

working with the liquidator to try...

Member
Tommy Sheppard (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc628-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman spoke to this issue with the seriousness it deserved and in a constructive fashion. I can give him two assurances. The first is that the Government are certainly going to continue to pay the wages—salaries, as well as those of suppliers and subcontractors—in respect of UK Government...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc629-630
House
House of Commons

I commend my right hon. Friend for his swift and urgent action on this issue. I urge him to pay no attention whatsoever to the politicking coming from the Opposition Benches, because it was of course Labour Members who, when in government, drove the process of private sector involvement hard....

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c630
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his suggestions. I note that the Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, my hon. Friend the Member for Harwich and North Essex (Mr Jenkin), said today that his Committee is going to launch an inquiry into Government procurement....

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c630
House
House of Commons

This morning, the 400 employees who work in the Carillion headquarters in my constituency in Wolverhampton, along with many others, woke up to the news that Carillion had gone into liquidation. It probably felt like a bomb had hit them. The Minister says that the Government are going to give...

Member
Eleanor Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c630
House
House of Commons

On the hon. Lady’s last point, I responded at quite some length to similar points made by her Front-Bench colleague, the hon. Member for Hemsworth (Jon Trickett). The Government are, as I have said more than once in these exchanges, not only offering advice

but paying the wages and salaries...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c630
House
House of Commons

On the HS2 aspect of this—my hon. Friend the Member for Stafford (Jeremy Lefroy) joins me in this question because HS2 carves straight through our constituencies—will my right hon. Friend make publicly available the assessment of the Government and HS2 Ltd of the impact of Carillion’s collapse and the viability...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c631
House
House of Commons

I can certainly well understand the importance of this issue to my hon. Friend’s constituents and those of many other hon. and right hon. Members. The answer in respect of the particular contract that was awarded last year is that the two other private sector parties are now bound contractually...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c631
House
House of Commons

While 20,000 people across the UK, including 400 employees in Wolverhampton at Carillion’s headquarters, are now at risk of losing their jobs, it seems that the senior management of Carillion have changed the rules so that they can keep hold of their exorbitant bonuses. Does the right hon. Gentleman think...

Member
Emma Reynolds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c631
House
House of Commons