Skip to main content

1-20 of 37 results for member:"Lord Hain"

Year X
2024

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the Minister mentioned China. Why are some of the offshore wind farm components, especially the huge structures and blades, being manufactured in China rather than in Britain?

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 May 2024
Reference
838 c687
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand that the Minister is a Home Office Minister. However, the noble Lord, Lord Caine, will be able to educate him on the fact that anybody who knows the primary legislation implementing the Belfast/Good Friday agreement will not be in the least surprised by the High Court...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
838 c614
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I follow on from the noble Baroness’s diktat position whereby central Government decide the policy and nobody else can have a view. That would undermine the position. It was the thrust of the noble Baroness’s earlier speech that the Minister indicated that it is for the UK Government...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2024
Reference
838 cc39-42
House
House of Lords

I have not called for the dismantling of the State of Israel. I was a Middle East Minister for the Government and conducted diplomacy with the Israeli Prime Minister in 2000, trying to repair the damage from the collapse of Camp David. I support the right of Israel to exist,...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2024
Reference
838 c40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Hendy’s amendment. Not only has he made a very powerful case as a renowned labour rights lawyer, but he has mentioned the question of the Welsh Government’s position, which is something I want to ask noble Lords, and in particular the Minister,...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2024
Reference
838 cc26-7
House
House of Lords

I very much support what the noble Lord said about Zimbabwe. He will know that there was a lot of corruption in the Marange diamond mines, with Government Ministers taking a rake-off from those diamonds. We should be boycotting diamonds from conflict zones such as that, or where corruption is...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2024
Reference
838 c43
House
House of Lords

Since this has been raised—and I am not sure who I am intervening on—that was a long time ago. I do not withdraw the fact that there are

many features of the State of Israel of which I am critical, not least in its dual citizenship law, where certain citizens...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2024
Reference
838 c51
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what plans they have to review sanctions against Russian individuals in the light of President Putin’s re-election and the continuing war in Ukraine.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1581-5
House
House of Lords

Notwithstanding that, does the Minister agree that President Putin is successfully driving forward his barbaric attacks on Ukraine by managing to dodge sanctions, despite the UK Government-imposed measures he has described—including a price cap to curb his profit from Russian oil exports? There is mounting evidence that most Russian oil exports exceed that cap, and Putin seems to be getting all the income he needs to fuel his war economy. More targeted action is surely desperately needed. Will the Government now sanction the insurers—many of which are UK-based—of vessels transporting Russian oil above the cap, and also sanction owners of the ports hosting those vessels? Will the Minister try to get all our allies to do the same?

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2024
Reference
837 c1582
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness. I did not advocate a boycott; that was not my purpose. I was talking about the destruction of the environment in Gaza and the West Bank, and that is not disputable.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c1063
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in responding to the debate I invite everybody who heard what I said, and those who did not hear what I said, to read it in

Hansard tomorrow. Did anybody hear me advocate the BDS cause? Did anybody hear me advocate a boycott of the State of Israel?...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1070-1
House
House of Lords

I agree that they are not that similar, and I have never suggested that they are. The reason I brought in the South Africa comparison, and majored on it, is that legal opinion says that this Bill would have made the anti-apartheid campaigns of the late 1960s, 1970s and 1980s...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1071-2
House
House of Lords

I am happy to be interrupted on that point.

My point to the noble Lord, and to the whole House, is that this Bill is technically flawed. I refer to the explanatory statement that I put on the face of my amendment:

“This amendment seeks to ensure that the Secretary of State...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c1072
House
House of Lords

I have already done that. On what he calls my favourite hobby of attacking Israel, as it happens, as I said in the foreign affairs debate, the whole strategy for resolving this terrible dispute is fundamentally flawed. The lessons should be learned

from the Northern Ireland experience. Hamas will not...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1072-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the Committee for speaking so soon after my previous contribution, but I will speak to my Amendment 20A. I associate myself with the amendments of the noble Baroness, Lady Bryan, which I have signed.

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas of...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1075-6
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness accurately quoted the Welsh Government’s position as referring to occupied territories which are illegally occupied, including those determined by the British Government, not as boycotting Israel.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c1080
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful. I agree with everything he has said. On his point about central government not always being correct, that would have been the case in the 1930s when a Conservative Government were appeasing Hitler and there was massive pressure from outside, from people in all walks of...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c1081
House
House of Lords

I will be brief, given the hour. What advice would the Minister give to Welsh local authorities if they refuse to procure or encourage any local companies to do business with Xinjiang province in China because of its oppression of the Uighur Muslims? China, unlike Russia and Belarus, is not...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c1085
House
House of Lords

May I also ask a question? I am very grateful to the Minister, who has indeed been generous in responding, even if she has been unable to offer the Committee further clarification. Virtually all training in this country is privately provided, by private organisations, but publicly funded. Where do they...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 c1009
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hain

15: Clause 3, page 2, line 24, at end insert—

“(2A) Regulations under subsection (2) may not amend the Schedule to remove environmental misconduct as an exception from the application of section 1.”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment seeks to ensure that the Secretary of State cannot remove environmental misconduct as...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1028-9
House
House of Lords