Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for subject:Devolution

Year X
2023
Legislation X
Scotland Act 1998

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Scotland Act 1998 (32)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
HC 149 2023-24
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
HC 154 2023-24
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
HC 149 2023-24
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
13 November 2023
Reference
HC 149 2023-24
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
16 October 2023
Reference
HC 1738 2022-23
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Scottish Affairs Committee
Date
4 September 2023
Reference
HC 1738 2022-23
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Date
18 July 2023
House
House of Commons

What discussions she has had with Cabinet colleagues on the potential implications of an order under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 for the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament.

Asked by
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2023
Reference
903442; 727 cc332-3
House
House of Commons

As I said earlier, by convention, information on whether the Law Officers have been asked to provide advice and the content of such advice are not disclosed outside Government. That convention enables candid legal advice to be given.

Answered by
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 February 2023
Reference
727 c333
House
House of Commons

Why was the prospect of a section 35 order not raised at any time before the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was overwhelmingly passed by the Scottish Parliament? What alternatives did the Attorney General look at? When will she set out the changes to the Bill that she wants to see before the Government would revoke the section 35 order? Those are simple questions. If she cannot answer them, all we can conclude is that the Government have lost their last shred of respect for the Scottish Parliament.

Asked by
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2023
Reference
727 c333
House
House of Commons

That would be absolutely the wrong conclusion to draw. The Attorney General’s convention is clear: the UK Government respect the Scottish Parliament’s ability to legislate within its competence on devolved areas. The Government are committed to working with the devolved Administrations and strengthening the Union of the UK.

Answered by
Baroness Prentis of Banbury (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 February 2023
Reference
727 c333
House
House of Commons

My Lords, in politics there are those issues about which we should, and do, fight hammer and tongs across these Dispatch Boxes and in the other place—issues of taxation, health, Brexit, schools or foreign policy. Gender recognition and the rights of trans people does not have to be one of...

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1872-4
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister accept—I think he has to—that it was a very controversial decision to use this power for the first time since devolution, especially, as the noble Baroness, Lady Chapman, has said, when the Government lack trust in many quarters regarding their respect for devolution? It has generated a...

Member
Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1874-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is only after very careful consideration that the Secretary of State for Scotland has decided to make an order under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 to prevent the Scottish Parliament’s Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from proceeding to Royal Assent. He has considered policy and...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1875
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is not just trans people caught in the crossfire but women. Internationally, women are losing their rights in some countries as to what they wear, how they are educated, where they can work, their reproductive rights and protection against violence. They are even losing their freedom of...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1875
House
House of Lords

The Equality Act 2010, to which this Government are entirely committed, is a reserved matter. On the basis that we have a unitary state in the United Kingdom, we believe that it

is a key matter that must be applied equally across all four nations of the United Kingdom. That...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1875
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a very difficult issue to get your head around. In a previous incarnation, I was a non-executive director of the Scottish Prison Service. I saw the terrible vulnerability of women in prison, many of whom had been abused since being babies. They wanted to be in...

Member
Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1876
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness’s well-informed comments indicate the sensitivities that we are dealing with in Scotland and the wider UK. The Bill as its stands risks creating significant complications from two different gender recognition regimes in the UK, which could allow for more of the fraudulent or bad-faith applications that we...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 cc1876-7
House
House of Lords

Does my noble friend the Minister agree that what the noble Baroness, Lady Liddell, has ably demonstrated in referring to concerns about the fraudulent use of this provision is the importance of the Government and the Official Opposition being united in their position on the steps proposed by the Scottish...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1877
House
House of Lords

Yes, I agree with the noble Baroness. What is happening is that the boundaries of devolution are being pushed to the limit. Perhaps the architects at the time did not anticipate that we would be here on such an issue, but they put Section 35 into the Act for a...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2023
Reference
826 c1877
House
House of Lords