Skip to main content

1-20 of 67 results for subject:Enforcement

Year X
2019
Subject X
Judgements

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Judgements (67)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Taking Control of Goods (Fees) Regulations 2014 have ensured that VAT is no longer applied to debts enforced under a High Court judgment; and if not, what steps they will take to resolve this.

Asked by
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2019
Reference
HL133
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Women and Equalities Committee
Date
17 July 2019
Reference
HC 1470 2017-19
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what guidance his Department issued to claimants who wish to make a complaint in the event that moneys owed to them through a court judgment are not reclaimed in full by high court enforcement companies.

Asked by
Baroness Debbonaire (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 April 2019
Reference
238386
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to monitor the timeliness with which High Court Enforcement Ltd reclaim moneys awarded through a court judgment.

Asked by
Baroness Debbonaire (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 April 2019
Reference
238385
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lucy Frazer
Answering member
Yasmin Qureshi
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Fifteenth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
14 March 2019
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with (1) the Bar Council, (2) the Law Society, and (3) other interested organisations about the impact of Brexit on the cross-border enforcement of civil judgments.

Asked by
Baroness Quin (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 February 2019
Reference
HL13337
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary David Gauke
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
14 February 2019
Reference
SI 2019/836; SI 2019/
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Does the Secretary of State agree that it is vital to ensure continuity of contractual obligations and enforceability of judgments once we leave the EU, which would be prevented by a no-deal outcome?

Asked by
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
654 c165
House
House of Commons

Yes.

Answered by
David Gauke (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 February 2019
Reference
654 c165
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Each instrument divided upon separately and each agreed to on division (9 to 2).

Lead member
Lucy Frazer
Answering member
Yasmin Qureshi
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Ninth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
30 January 2019
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Motion negatived.

Lead member
Lord Keen of Elie
Answering member
Lord Beecham
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 cc215-235GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Keen of Elie
Answering member
Lord Beecham
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 cc240-250GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this draft instrument forms part of our ongoing work to ensure that, if the UK leaves the EU without a deal, our legal system will continue to work effectively for our citizens. If Parliament approves the withdrawal agreement, which includes an implementation period, and passes the necessary legislation...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 cc215-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords

I am not taking interventions during the opening speech. It is the Government’s view that removing deficient retained EU law and associated domestic legislation from domestic law will clarify the rules that apply to determine jurisdiction, recognition and the enforcement of judgements post exit. This has the benefit of protecting...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister sits down—

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords

I have already sat down.

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister said that he would not take interventions.

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords

That is correct.

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords

That is extremely disrespectful to the Committee, if I may say so, because now there is no other way for us to ask the Minister questions before he responds at the end of the entire debate—and we will have no means to come back on his statements at that point...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 January 2019
Reference
795 c216GC
House
House of Lords