1-9 of 9 results for subject:Location
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.262 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Location
- We searched for
- subject_t:Location OR subject_t:Relocation OR subject_ses:91881
Type
House
Session
Month
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, pursuant to the Answer of 20 May 2019 to Question 253493 on Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Location, how many staff are located in the new premises at 85 Strand; how much floor space...
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, pursuant to the Answer of 20 May 2019 to Question 253493 on Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority: Location, how many staff are located in the new premises at 85 Strand; how much floor space...
I have asked IPSA to reply.
IPSA currently has 69 members of staff. It included in its office requirements space for up to 76 staff in order to provide flexibility for periods where there is a higher volume of work and therefore a need for additional temporary staff, such as General Election periods.
To disclose the size of the office or rate paid per square metre would be prejudicial to commercial interests. IPSA’s annual accounts are laid in Parliament and published each year, and will provide information about operational costs.
Before choosing its offices at 85 Strand, IPSA considered potential premises in Croydon and Milton Keynes, as well as Stratford and Canary Wharf in London, but determined that the selected location provided the prospect of better support to MPs and better value for money for the taxpayer.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has sought a repayable cash advance from the Contingencies Fund of £14,700,000 to ensure the CMA’s relocation to Canary Wharf remains on schedule.
The CMA will receive its voted funding for this project at the Main Estimate, and consequently may only draw the related cash...
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has sought a repayable cash advance from the Contingencies Fund of £14,700,000 to ensure the CMA’s relocation to Canary Wharf remains on schedule.
The CMA will receive its voted funding for this project at the Main Estimate, and consequently may only draw the related cash...
My hon Friend, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Small Business, Consumers and Corporate Responsibility (Kelly Tolhurst) has made the following statement:
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has sought a repayable cash advance from the Contingencies Fund of £14,700,000 to ensure the CMA’s relocation to Canary Wharf remains on...
My hon Friend, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Small Business, Consumers and Corporate Responsibility (Kelly Tolhurst) has made the following statement:
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has sought a repayable cash advance from the Contingencies Fund of £14,700,000 to ensure the CMA’s relocation to Canary Wharf remains on...
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what the cost has been of the move by IPSA to new premises in central London; and what assessment was made of the potential merits of moving the organisation to a cheaper location...
To ask the hon. Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, what the cost has been of the move by IPSA to new premises in central London; and what assessment was made of the potential merits of moving the organisation to a cheaper location...
I have asked IPSA to reply.
IPSA moved into new office premises at 85 Strand in March 2019. The forecasted cost of this move is £732,900. This budget was approved by the Speaker’s Committee for the IPSA in January 2018. IPSA’s Annual Accounts for the 2018-19 financial year are being finalised and will be laid in Parliament in November. The Speaker’s Committee will have an opportunity to scrutinise this and other expenditure.
After reviewing properties on the market, the offices selected met IPSA’s criteria and offered the best value for money to the taxpayer over the long term, with competitive running cost over the life of the lease after completing initial fit-out work. Locations outside of London were considered. IPSA concluded that basing IPSA’s office in London and within reasonable distance of Parliament would ensure that IPSA can provide a better support to MPs and their staff, including regular meetings between them and their IPSA account managers.
What steps his Department is taking to move civil service jobs out of London in line with the Government's Industrial Strategy.
What steps his Department is taking to move civil service jobs out of London in line with the Government's Industrial Strategy.
We have established the Places for Growth Programme to relocate Civil Service roles into the regions and nations. This will see at least 1,000 roles moved by 2022 and thousands more by 2030.
The programme is reinforcing the Government’s commitment to driving economic growth across the UK through local industrial strategies, devolution deals and city deals.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 12 February 2019 to Question 218343, if he will publish the criteria by which The Hoo site was determined to be unsuitable for Abacus Belsize Primary School in Belsize Park.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 12 February 2019 to Question 218343, if he will publish the criteria by which The Hoo site was determined to be unsuitable for Abacus Belsize Primary School in Belsize Park.
Following an extensive site search, the department purchased the Hampstead police station for Abacus Belsize Primary School. The Hoo site has been judged unsuitable because the existing listed building on the site is not large enough to cater for a school of this size without a new build extension and considerable remodelling.
The award of the contract for the Central and East London screening service to the Royal Free was approved by both NHS England’s London region and NHS England’s commercial executive group. An agreed recovery plan was put into place to address the various issues. While the service did plummet to 1,100 in April 2018, it is currently inviting 3,000 women per month, which has been the normal monthly invitation rate for the service for the past three years. Women are currently being offered appointments in line with the agreed recovery plan and with the national breast screening standard, with 90% or more being invited within 36 months of their previous screening by October 2019.
The award of the contract for the Central and East London screening service to the Royal Free was approved by both NHS England’s London region and NHS England’s commercial executive group. An agreed recovery plan was put into place to address the various issues. While the service did plummet to 1,100 in April 2018, it is currently inviting 3,000 women per month, which has been the normal monthly invitation rate for the service for the past three years. Women are currently being offered appointments in line with the agreed recovery plan and with the national breast screening standard, with 90% or more being invited within 36 months of their previous screening by October 2019.
The Central and East London breast screening service was performing well until last April, when it was transferred from Barts Health NHS Trust to the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, even though the Royal Free and did not have enough staff. The number of women invited plummeted from 3,000 a month to 1,000 a month. Why was that transfer allowed to go ahead, given the clear warnings about what the consequences would be? Who is responsible for this failure?
The Central and East London breast screening service was performing well until last April, when it was transferred from Barts Health NHS Trust to the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, even though the Royal Free and did not have enough staff. The number of women invited plummeted from 3,000 a month to 1,000 a month. Why was that transfer allowed to go ahead, given the clear warnings about what the consequences would be? Who is responsible for this failure?
The Central and East London breast screening service was performing well until last April, when it was transferred from Barts Health NHS Trust to the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, even though the Royal Free and did not have enough staff. The number of women invited plummeted from 3,000 a month to 1,000 a month. Why was that transfer allowed to go ahead, given the clear warnings about what the consequences would be? Who is responsible for this failure?
The award of the contract for the Central and East London screening service to the Royal Free was approved by both NHS England’s London region and NHS England’s commercial executive group. An agreed recovery plan was put into place to address the various issues. While the service did plummet to 1,100 in April 2018, it is currently inviting 3,000 women per month, which has been the normal monthly invitation rate for the service for the past three years. Women are currently being offered appointments in line with the agreed recovery plan and with the national breast screening standard, with 90% or more being invited within 36 months of their previous screening by October 2019.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 28 November 2018 to Question 195085, whether his Department made a subsequent assessment of the viability of The Hoo as a location for the proposed Abacus Free School in Belsize Park since the reduction of its listed...
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 28 November 2018 to Question 195085, whether his Department made a subsequent assessment of the viability of The Hoo as a location for the proposed Abacus Free School in Belsize Park since the reduction of its listed...
The Hoo site has already been reviewed and determined to be unsuitable for Abacus Belsize Primary School. The department has purchased a suitable site and intends to submit a planning application shortly.